Causes of Cardiac Arrest | American Heart Association

Recreational drug use – This can occur in otherwise healthy people.

The liberals's broken record of using the narrative of legalizing marijuana to "do some supposed studies" is false. How many years does it take California and Colorado to do these so-called studies if Cannabis can be obtained for free even for a few pennies? In addition, we already have these studies, you just need to investigate in the public medical pages and you will see the statistics. For example, anyone can look for these studies: Cannabis-Induced Psychosis: A Review ; also: What We Know About Marijuana | Featured Topics | Marijuana and Public Health (cdc gov)

On the Internet, cannabis promoters mislead young people by twisting the meaning of certain passages to justify its use. Like for example this passage from 1 Timothy 4:4
1 Timothy 4:4 Commentaries: For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with gratitude; (biblehub.com)

For every creature of God is good - Greek, "all the creatures, or all that God has created" - πᾶν κτίσμα pan ktisma: that is, as he made it; compare Genesis 1:10, Genesis 1:12, Genesis 1:18, Genesis 1:31. It does not mean that every moral agent remains good as long as he is "a creature of God," but moral agents, human beings and angels, were good as they were made at first; Genesis 1:31. Nor does it mean that all that God has made is good "for every object to which it can be applied." It is good in its place; good for the purpose for which he made it. But it should not be inferred that a thing which is poisonous in its nature is good for food, "because" it is a creation of God. It is good only in its place, and for the ends for which he intended it. Nor should it be inferred that what God has made is necessarily good "after" it has been perverted by man. As God made it originally, it might have been used without injury.
Apples and peaches were made good, and are still useful and proper as articles of food; rye and Indian-corn are good, and are admirably adapted to the support of man and beast, but it does not follow that all that "man" can make of them is necessarily good. He extracts from them a poisonous liquid, and then says that "every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused." But is this a fair use of this passage of Scripture? True, they "are" good - they "are" to be received with gratitude as he made them, and as applied to the uses for which he designed them; but why apply this passage to prove that a deleterious beverage, which "man" has extracted from what God has made, is good also, and good for all the purposes to which it can be applied? As "God" made these things, they are good. As man perverts them, it is no longer proper to call them the "creation of God," and they may be injurious in the highest degree. This passage, therefore, should not be adduced to vindicate the use of intoxicating drinks (or drugs that are extracted from plants such as mind-altering Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from Marijuana, cocaine, etc.). As employed by the apostle, it had no such reference, nor does it contain any "principle" which can properly receive any such application.
And nothing to be refused - Nothing that God has made, for the purposes for which he designed it. The necessity of the case the "exigency of the passage" - requires this interpretation. It "cannot" mean that we are not to refuse poison if offered in our food, or that we are never to refuse food that is to us injurious or offensive; nor can it anymore mean that we are to receive "all" that may be offered to us as a beverage. The sense is, that as God made it, and for the purposes for which he designed it, it is not to be held to be evil; or, which is the same thing, it is not to be prohibited as if there were merit in abstaining from it. It is not to be regarded as a religious duty to abstain from food which God has appointed for the support of man.
If it be received with thanksgiving - see the 1 Corinthians 10:31 note; Ephesians 5:20 note; Philippians 4:6 note.

According to the U.S. Library of National Medicine, “Smoking cannabis has been further linked with symptoms of chronic bronchitis… Based on immuno-histopathological and epidemiological evidence, smoking cannabis poses a potential risk for developing lung cancer.

[Cannabis smoking and lung cancer] - PubMed (nih.gov)

Cannabis exposure doubles the risk of developing lung cancer.

There is nothing good that comes from recreational marijuana use. I can’t comment on medicinal use. It clearly alters the mind, and harms a person’s intelligence and ambition. The difficulty with it is that anyone can grow at least enough for their own personal consumption. It can be done indoors with the right equipment. It doesn’t require the sort of refinement of the other schedule 1 substances, and doesn’t have the same grave dangers of physical harm that other “hard drugs” have. I’m against it’s legalization, but formation in temperance is badly needed, if half of American adults have used it, and 68% want it legal. It’s never going to go away, so it needs to be shunned.