An Exorcist Reveals the Truth About Demons
youtube.com/watch?v=mX7L68p9exk
Interview with an Exorcist (Fr Vincent Lampert)
An exorcist in the Catholic Church must be a priest who has been granted that faculty (jurisdiction). If the new rite of consecration (of a bishop) was invalid then there would be exorcists today who are not priests. If that were case then the demon who possessed a person would know the exorcist had no power and would reveal that fact (see the Fr. Lampert interviews on Pints with Aquinas). But Fr. Lampert’s exorcisms have been successful, so he must have been validly ordained by a bishop (Abp. O'Meara) consecrated with the NRoC (1981). Therefore Abp. Vigano/Bp. Williamson’s claim that there’s a doubt regarding the validity of the NRoC is demonstrably false.
All celebrity exorcists incur the same doubts (Amorth, Ripperger, etc).
As always, you’re totally incapable of any rational reasoning.
If the NROC is invalid then there’s no bishop and, therefore, no priest, and so no exorcist to perform a solemn exorcism of the Church, which necessarily means no casting out demons of those possessed. But if this was the case it would be easily demonstrable since any demon would know of the priest’s invalid ordination and would claim the priest had no power to cast him out. And since practically all diocesan priests today have been ordained by a NROC bishop there would be no successful exorcisms pretty much anywhere.
Now if traditional priests (FSSP/ICKSP/SSPX) were called to cases where N.O. priests had failed, and cast out the demons, it would be easy to demonstrate a pattern, since the number of cases is only ever growing. And wouldn’t these traditional group(s) have duty to publicize this pattern? But this has not happened - nor will it.
As always, such an intelligent response. It’s worth a like just to highlight the fact I have you on the ropes.
Don’t worry, in 4 days you can make your “I’m more holy than any of you announcement and begin your 40 day diet.
While you can hide behind your computer and dream you had the manhood to talk to a woman without blushing.
And here’s me thinking I was actually talking to a woman, albeit some hysterical woman, one that can only deal in emotions, no rational thinking whatever, as I’ve demonstrated.
No, you were imagining yourself having the manhood to actually talk to a woman without blushing profoundly (rather than impersonating one instead).