The Unrepentant Revolutionary www.linkedin.com/pulse/unrepentant-rev… Today, when many conservatives believe that Benedict XVI has became a strong advocate of Church tradition, the question is more opportune than ever. Did he abjure his previous Progressivism? I think the record will show, that in deed, word, and devotion Joseph Ratzinger was and is and will likely die an heresiarch and inveterate revolutionary.

Here is the denial
Benedict To Sarah: “The Text Can Be Published In the Form You Have Foreseen”

The essence of the false pontificate of francis 1st is dissimulation and when that fails , outright lying.
Catholics are advised to avoid everything to do with the schismatic followers of francis 1st.

Mr. Vincent Boo, author of "The Pope of Joy" and "33 keys of Pope Francis": "Benedict XVI never saw or approved the book that Cardinal Sarah presents as the work of both."

Elisabetta Piqué, the Rome correspondent of Argentine daily La Nacion, who is close to Francis, said that a "high Vatican source" claims Benedict never wrote any part of the book. But Sarah showed evidence of Benedict XVI's accompanying letters.

The old modernist switcharoo.

Here is the proof of Sarah
Sarah Proves Collaboration With Benedict XVI.

"an anonymous person close to Joseph Ratzinger" He also says Pope Francis is secretly a practicing Satanist. This anonymous source is close to both men, so it must be true, amirite? :P

The persecution is expected. May the Lord protect them from any harm.

Francis and Scalfari, Benedict and Sarah.

1

More

• Report
• Change comment
• Remove comment

Even America Magazine does not believe the rumours

HerzMariaeJan 13, 2020

If O’Connell really believed his source, he should name the person, when it’s shown that the story is false.

Like

More

• Report
• Change comment
• Remove comment

Here is the link to the weak dementi.
Fessio is basing his conclusion on Sarah’s word.
www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/ignatius-press-…

What in the world is going on ????