Both of you miss the point. You have no authority to judge anyone let alone a Church superior. Even if the Pope is guilty of all you say, you do not have the authority in the eyes of God to judge him. And the logical reason for that - apart from the danger of an endless multitude of wanna-be popes, is to avoid a headless body; a headless Church. For in disposing a Pope, one must also have the power to elect a new one. This brings us to Sede-vacantists. Those who hold to this heresy are acting as their own Magisterium. They insist over and over again that sede-vacantism is a "truth" and insult those who do not accept their personal judgment. In other words, they are claiming binding authority as a layman as if they were a Pope or council. This is protestant, and it is revolutionary - power to the people! Socialism.
Moreover, I challenge either of you to present one binding doctrine - that harms our faith and directly contradicts previous binding doctrines - that the last number of Popes have introduced. If Pope Francis is a manifest heretic then please show us what dogma he has officially denied (to be a heretic one must publically embrace a formal heresy).
Meanwhile, stop with the usurper nonsense. Pope Benedict made it crystal clear that he was abdicating on his own free-will and that the seat of Peter would be temporarily empty until a new Pope was elected: Translation from the Latin: “Therefore, well aware of the seriousness of this action, in full liberty I declare that I resign the ministry of the bishop of Rome, of the Successor of St. Peter, entrusted to me through the hands of the Cardinals on the 19th day of April, 2005, with the result that, from the twenty-eighth day of February 2013 [see below], at the twentieth hour, the see of Rome, the See of St. Peter, will be vacant; and I declare that a Conclave to select a new highest pontiff needs to be convoked by those to whom the duty belongs.”