I do not deny that the government uses psyops. I'm not denying that the government operates clandestinely to our detriment. I believe that occurs, probably more regularly and subtly than most realize. So here is my question regarding the Assumption shootings, the stabbing, the attempted assassination on Trump, the completed assassination of Kirk - ultimately, why does the "conspiracy" angle matter? I'm really struggling to understand that. In my autistic mind, it doesn't matter how manufactured or organic the above events and others like them are. The end result will very likely be the same - increased government control and the erosion of liberties. It feels like we're spinning our wheels trying to figure out how the above happened at the cost of preventing/preparing for the why. Human energy is finite. Someone please help me out. Edited because I am a clumsy typist on my phone.
I think the PSYOP has a good side and a bad side. The good side is when a soul wakes up and breaks free from the spectacle. They now have their eyes opened and see the real panorama before them giving them moral courage to make better decisions. This is what I hope to gain by countering the anti Catholic propaganda widespread on GTV. The bad side is that we become mesmerized by uncovering the bread crumb trail of clue's like in the movie "A Beautiful Mind." God help us make the right decisions! God bless you!
Parents are stressed & worried about their children in this godless society? NO KIDDING! Nice for the "government" to notice. Now if they would only own up to the fact that they are the CAUSE of a lot of the things parents are anxious about! What will they do about that. I shutter to think and recall Reagan's saying: "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
When man starts militating and destroying the birth process, he is playing God, and HE is not impressed. God made everything PERFECT, and man destroys what he cannot control.
Valentinus Taken Prisoner But let’s take the news of the last few days in turn. First of all, there is the case of the “Missionaries of Divine Mercy”—a small community of diocesan right founded by the (now virtually deposed) Bishop Rey of Frejus-Toulon for the care of the old rite. If we understand correctly what we have learned about this hitherto unknown community, Bishop Dominique Rey founded this community years ago and also endowed it (at least to some extent) with its own seminary in order to take over the training of diocesan priests in the old rite. It sounds like news from another world, but Bishop Rey was striving for a “liturgical peace” in his diocese under the pontificate of Benedict XVI, in which both the faithful and candidates for the priesthood would be free to choose one of the “two forms of the Roman rite” or even to celebrate in the one or the other. And it was precisely this that drew the wrath and revenge of the new rulers after Benedict’s abdication. (see our …
It seems to me that the degree of loyalty to the conciliar church (and especially the Second Vatican council) is the only criterion by which the Vatican allows or does not allow traditional liturgy. That is, if you sell your soul to the devil, he will allow you some traditional rites in return.
A phony war declared by guys who failed to notice that Rome had abandoned the Roman Rite over 50 years ago. Fictions upon fictions of people unable to read with attention Quattuor abhinc annos - the mother of all "indultist" delusions. There they have been advised honestly and explicitly what is the "indult" system for.
Family abolitionism is, apparently, a thing. Enter Sophie Lewis, a feminist critic and author of Also, "manifesto"? Doesn't she mean "personifesto"? Misogynist! Here's a small excerpt of one book review, to give you an indication of her…opinions. Anchored in a strikingly hopeful feminist Marxism, Lewis leads the reader through a systematic, didactic introduction to the politics and possibilities of cutting ourselves loose from the constraints and impositions of the traditional patriarchal, capitalist family. "Strikingly hopeful feminist Marxism," said of a 21st century reincarnation of Napoleon from George Orwell's If you can find your way through the vocabulary vomit, however, you'll find that Sophie Lewis is just another lunatic stomping her way through society in a campaign to rebrand any concern for the sexual innocence of children as a moral panic derived from Anita Bryant that is actually motivated by homophobia and/or Christian evangelical capitalism. I speak English. I think …