Bro, every comment you make reeks of an extreme lack of charity....said the Jew-Hater.
:D Motes and beams,"Bro", motes and beams.
Still, it's nice to see you
finally noticed. Welcome to GTV, "Bro".
:DA lack of
charity does not presuppose factual error or even correctness.
I can be
uncharitable and
still be
correct. You, by contrast, are just as
uncharitable when it comes to "joos" but "your"
still wrong.
Raising the issue is irrelevant and in this context, a Red-Herring Fallacy. That little fish just turned around bit you, "Bro".
:D"Now your comparing yourself to Christ?"Nope. I'm using Christ's teachings to show the error in
your premise, namely vitriol supposedly implies a lack of confidence. It doesn't.
I don't have to
compare myself to Christ to hold Christ up as an
example. You've also forgotten Christ Himself said, "For I have given you an example, that as I have done to you, so you do also."
That's
John 13:15, "Bro" and it means...
1.) I can present Him as an example without making a comparison to myself ...
2.) I can use as much vitriol as I please in pointing out
your errors because He did the same to His critics.
3.) Your half-witted attempt at pop psychology simply doesn't apply here.
You stink at logic as badly as you do theology, not to mention grammar. If nothing else, perhaps you'll finally learn the difference beween "your" and "you're".
If you're wondering why I keep pointing out "your" uneducated, it's because you insist on displaying it every chance you get, "Bro"..
:DI'm not comparing myself to
you either, dummy. But I
do enjoy poking fun at the mistakes "your" making.
"But I guess you'd rather say nothing and see the Jews perish, then call them out for rejecting their own Messiah and subverting the moral order."This is a
Catholic media portal, so "your" not evangelizing to "Joos" or trying to save them. "Joos" as either a race or a religion don't "subvert the moral order", either.
That claim is almost word for word straight out of The Gospel According to E. Michael Jones. "Your" showing just what a mindless little parrot you are, "Bro."
Don't try to sanctimoniously misrepresent what "your" doing here, bigot-boy. The
last thing you Jew-haters
ever want to do is help "joos".
All "your" doing here is trying to win converts to your own Jew-hating agenda and "your" not fooling nobody, "Bro".
:DBtw. "Your" forgettingw what yesterday, "Bro."
Why are you writing "Jews"? Yesterday you claimed you need to write
"joos" because of "
how much power they have" (your words, your claim) even though "your" on a Catholic-
created and Catholic-
run media portal.
I think there's a more likely reason: You were a liar
yesteraday, and a stupid
forgetful liar
today.
Just admit it, you were poking fun at them, "Bro".
It's typical low-brow anti-Semitic humor. Durr hurr, let's call 'em "joos"... cuz dat's fuh-nee!
:P"Anyway, you can't have leaders without followers."So according to
that reasoning,
"your" a follower of Pope Francis and
agree with every asinine statement he makes.
When he speaks about Pachamama, "your" in full agreement. When he writes a glowing letter of praise to a pro-homosexual priest, "your" wishing you could sign the letter too.
He's the leader of The Church and, like you said,
"you can't have leaders without followers"Right, "Bro"?
Gotcha! :DIn truth, all that quip demonstrates is "your" as ignorant of Catholic history as you are of basic political theory. Leadership does
not require the agreement of those who are led.
The worst totalitarian leaders, including your own dear Uncle Adolph, led overwhelmingly by force alone.
I'm surprised "your" making a mistake like that, bigot-boy.
Maybe you should try
reading that nice Time-Life 21 volume "The Third Reich" series on your bookshelf
Read it for once, instead of just
looking at the pictures.Tell me... Does "
little Bro" stand up and salute when "your" gawking at the dead "Joos" for the umpteenth time ?
Rhetorical question... "Bro".You don't have to answer. .
;-)"St. Paul was persecuted by the Jews everywhere he went in the Book of Acts."That moment when an anti-Semite realizes St. Paul
himself was a Jew.
:PAgain, "your" choosing to conflate
all Jews (i.e.
"the Jews everywhere",
your words verbatim) with only
those Jews who really
did persecute him.
Fallacy of Composition
again, "Bro-ski".
...because anti-Semitism is built on such fallacies. Sound reasoning naturally repudiates the errors "your" making.
"It's the same story being played out throughout history."The closest
you'll ever come to history is what E. Michael Jones shoves in that empty little skull of yours or the echo-box you get with the other Jew-haters on Stormfront... you fatuous incompetent.
" -of course in your world they must all be anti-Semites."Unsupported premise leading to a Non Sequitur Fallacy, bigot-boy. It's also a Strawman Argument, "Bro".
Do you have any
other ignorance you'd like to display for my amusement?
:DLogical fallacies? Theological mistakes? Misreadings from Scripture? Grade-school grammatical errors?
If "your" still interested in giving me excuses to discredit you and expose you for the moron you are well...
"Keep 'em coming!" ;-)