"nah, B16 doesn't contradict me."
I just quoted him doing so.
"In fact, his own words, written long ago about creating a bifurcated papacy, just buttress my points."
The other Ohio user claimed that to, parroting Anne Barnhardt.
Benedict expressly said, "there is no diarchy" which means, Benedict himself contradicted you. Again.
You're covering very old ground. This is why range-bans are so much more effective than account-bans.
"And of course, since there cannot be and was never instituted a "pope emeritus" in the 2000 year history of the church,"
From the article already linked: "Benedict explained that when he initially stepped down he wanted to be called "Father Benedict" rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI, but "I was too weak at that point to enforce it.".
Simply put, Benedict has repudiated the title. What other people call him does not mean he calls himself that.
"it's amazing that trads like you who "cling to tradition" embrace a radical new institution in the Church."
Papal resignations are neither radical nor new.
"Isn't that a little...hypocritical?"
No, for the reason just given.
"Now why would a modernist like B16 do something totally incongruent with traditional Catholicism? Duh.
...because people are not badly written cartoon characters with one-dimensional personalities. That's why. Duh.
"The real question is why so called Trads are OK with the creation of a new Papal title and position?"
No, the real question is why you insist on fabricating agreement for other people where none exists. A resigned pope is not a "new" anything.
"Maybe it's because, as I said in another post, you're simply cowards...
A more likely explanation is you're just hawking up the brainless accusations that got Mr. Tough Talk Mike Yerian and all his other aliases kicked off GTV over and over again.
Every Ohio "Benedict Buddy" on GTV has gotten his teeth kicked in when he tries arguing specifics. You claiming "B16 doesn't contradict me." when he just did is exactly the sort of "cognitive dissonance" that defines the "Benedict Buddy" outlook.
"I really hope you can stop with this idiocy."
Right back at'cha, buttercup.
You're just noise. Old noise with a new name.
Any point you raise, once again, is just going to get knocked down... once again. Durr.. "da papal white". That just blew up in your face. Again.
Go find a shot of "Pope" Benedict wearing his Papal ring AFTER his resignation. Better still, go find a shot of him wearing it in the presence of Pope Francis. Good luck with that.
"Review:..."
The user with the head full of straw makes Strawman Fallacies. Gotta love the Loads O' Bold "Heavy Headline" tactics. Jimbo/ Mike/ Zecch/ etc. was fond of it too.
"What good are your Latin masses, your communion on the tongue if you don't stand up and defend Jesus Christ when He needs it the most?"
Non-Sequitur Fallacy. Zero relevance to the current papacy.
Benedict is not the Pope. He is not Jesus, either.
"A literal demon was enthroned in the Vatican, and you'd rather defend Bergoglio."
Nope, I'd rather prevent "Benedict Buddies" from spreading their lies, especially when the examples they're providing are ones refuted long ago.
"Examine yourself. You and your fellow poseurs."
Irony coming from you, Jimmy. How many name-changes and multiple accounts is this for you already? :D