SHE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY BUT HER FATHER WAS EXPELLED BY BOSTON COLLEGE WHICH IS …

SHE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY BUT HER FATHER WAS EXPELLED BY BOSTON COLLEGE WHICH IS IRRATIONAL ON THE COUNCIL AND CATECHISMS.

27.12.2025

SHE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY BUT HER FATHER WAS EXPELLED BY BOSTON COLLEGE WHICH IS IRRATIONAL ON THE COUNCIL AND CATECHISMS.
Boston College today interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope John Paul II irrationally unlike Sister Marie Terese.

Today Vatican Council II is being interpreted irrationally by Boston College and the USCCB. So the Council is wrongly projected as a break with Tradition when it really is in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism.

Boston College has still not apologized for expelling four Catholic professors and Fr. Leonard Feeney.The professors included the father of Sister Marie Therese, M.I.C.M. She is part of the group which appealed to the Vatican to lift the prohibition placed upon them. In February 2021, the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) held that the appeal had not been completed before the statute of limitations ran out; therefore the group must conform to the precepts it is reported.The CDF did not admit that the interpretation of the Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms by Sister Terese and her community was rational and traditional unlike that of the CDF. The Sister did not file a canonical appeal asking the CDF to clarify its position on Vatican Council II.
She joined the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in 1987 and made her final profession in 1990. For some twenty years, she studied various philosophical and theological disciplines under Brother Francis Maluf, M.I.C.M., Ph.D., the founder and father of Saint Benedict Center, Richmond. He is also her biological father.
At the St. Benedict Center they interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salu of the Council of Florence 1442. There are no known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II and there were none cited by the Council of Florence 1442.
Boston College today interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope John Paul II irrationally unlike Sister Marie Terese.
Having worked in Saint Benedict Center’s various educational and missionary apostolates for 14 years, Sister became sub-prioress in 2001, then Prioress in 2004. For twelve years, Sister Marie Thérèse was also the principal of IHM School. She has a regular column, the Convent Corner, in the newsletter – Mancipia – and she writes a monthly newsletter for members of the Sursum Corda society. She has studied Gregorian Chant extensively, taught the Brothers and Sisters, and is now teaching it at IHM School.
Boston College has still not apologized for expelling four Catholic professors and Fr. Leonard Feeney for their Catholic religious beliefs including the traditional teaching on there being no salvation outside the Church which we now know is supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
Boston College and the Americanists with the assistance of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing, rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They did this when they interpreted invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions for the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.

The archbishop interpreted invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Cardinal Seasn O' Malley makes the same mistake in public.

This was also the error in the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (1949) during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (Holy Office) made an objective mistake in public. The mistake was repeated at Vatican Council II (1965) by Pope Paul VI. They then asked Fr. Leonard Feeney to go to Rome to defend himself when he was not saying anything new. He correctly refused to do so.

The innovation was being made by the American Jesuits and the Vatican, at the time of Pope Pius XII, who did not defend the Jesuit priest, perhaps, for political reasons. This was after World War II and the creation of the state of Israel.

Today Vatican Council II is being interpreted irrationally by Boston College and the USCCB. So the Council is wrongly projected as a break with Tradition when it really is in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism.

So there is no change in the Church's teaching on Religious Liberty, the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State in Vatican Council II -Lionel Andrades