Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accepts Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
GARIBALDIAN ROME MUNICIPALITY INFILTRATES CATHOLIC CHURCH AT MONTHLY EUCHARISTIC ADORATION
07.11.2025
GARIBALDIAN ROME MUNICIPALITY INFILTRATES CATHOLIC CHURCH AT MONTHLY EUCHARISTIC ADORATION
Garibaldian Rome Municipality along with the parish of San Camillio de Lellis will officially be having Eucharistic Adoration at the Salustiana church in Rome. It is part of the Jubilee Year. It will continue once a month until June 2026 according to an announcement outside the church.
This is the church where they have joint Lenten services with the Protestant churches. It is approved by the Rome Vicariate which has an annual mission program with Protestants and the New Catechumenal Way of Kiko Arguello.
These projects are Christocentric and not Ecclesiocentric.This is liberalism in the Church based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. The rational interpretation of Vatican Council II is avoided since it would not be politically correct with the Left.
The Parish Priest at San Camillio, Salustiana, Fr. Sergio is also the Provincial of the San Camillio community. The …Altro
CARDINAL PAROLIN AND THE EMBASSIES INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY. NUNCIOS ARE IRRATIONAL AND POLITICAL
20.11.2025
CARDINAL PAROLIN AND THE EMBASSIES INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY. NUNCIOS ARE IRRATIONAL AND POLITICAL
The Vatican embassies and those of other countries at the Vatican, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. This is confirmed. There is no denial from the Vatican. So the Hungarian embassy for example, no more says outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation, for them. For then they would be affirming Vatican Council II, rational and traditional with no exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Athanasius Creed.Eduard Habsburg, Hungary’s ambassador to the Vatican, does not affirm the Council and Catechism rationally.This is in his political interest and that of Cardinal Parolin.They interpret Magisterial Documents schismatically. So they are in a rupture with the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church at the time of the Austro-Hungarian Catholic Empire.
According to AI on ‘X’ , if Pope Leo interpreted Vatican Council II honestly …Altro
L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE WITH AI ON ‘X’ : POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL.
05.11.2025
L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE WITH AI ON ‘X’ : POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL.
Andrea Monda, Director, L’Osservatore Romano , Fr. Antonio Spadero sj, editor in chief Civilita Cattolica and Paulo Ruffini, Director of the Vatican Dicastery for Communications, agree with A.I on ‘X’: Pope Leo and the College of Cardinals are in schism with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. There is no denial or comment also from Fr. Antonio Spadero sj, who has been monitoring these reports of mine on ‘X’.
Fr.James Martin sj, Crux, America, Massimo Faggioli, Austin Ivereigh, Hannah Brochus and Edward Pentin have been alerted to these reports- the column on those who follow show.
A.I predicts a coming schism in the Catholic Church from the Left. Since Vatican Council II is no more liberal.
I contacted Bishop Joseph Strickland via X .He has issued a pastoral statement on Vatican Council II but has not stated that LG 14 (baptism of desire …Altro
A.I ON ‘X’ INDICATES POPE LEO IS IN PUBLIC SCHISM WHICH WAS AN IMPEDIMENT IN HIS ELECTION BY THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS ALSO IN SCHISM.
04.11.2025
A.I ON ‘X’ INDICATES POPE LEO IS IN PUBLIC SCHISM WHICH WAS AN IMPEDIMENT IN HIS ELECTION BY THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS ALSO IN SCHISM.
x.com/i/grok?conversation=1985667776078352815
- Lionel Andrades
L'IA SU ‘X’ INDICA CHE PAPA LEONE È IN PUBBLICO SCISMA, IL QUALE COSTITUIVA UN IMPEDIMENTO NELLA SUA ELEZIONE DA PARTE DEL COLLEGIO DEI CARDINALI, ANCHE ESSI IN SCISMA. https:/
Lionel Andrades
04.11.2025
L'IA SU ‘X’ INDICA CHE PAPA LEONE È IN PUBBLICO SCISMA, IL QUALE COSTITUIVA UN IMPEDIMENTO NELLA SUA ELEZIONE DA PARTE DEL COLLEGIO DEI CARDINALI, ANCHE ESSI IN SCISMA. x.com/i/grok?conversation=1985667776078352815
tiolionel 667776078352815
A.I ON ‘X’ CONFIRMS : A SCHISM FROM THE LEFT IS EXPECTED IF THE POPE CLARIFIES THAT LG 14,16 ETC IN VATICAN COUNCIL II REFER TO HYPOTHETICAL CASES
A.I ON ‘X’ CONFIRMS : A SCHISM FROM THE LEFT IS EXPECTED IF THE POPE CLARIFIES THAT LG 14,16 ETC IN VATICAN COUNCIL II REFER TO HYPOTHETICAL CASES x.com/i/grok?conversation=1985296677914206649
- Lionel Andrades
ion=1985296677914206649
A. I SEES SCHISM OVER VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL : THE CATHOLIC CHURCH RETURNS TO THE MIDDLE AGES
02.11.2025
A. I SEES SCHISM OVER VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL : THE CATHOLIC CHURCH RETURNS TO THE MIDDLE AGES
There will be an overnight change to Tradition in the Catholic Church if Pope Leo or another pope announces that Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 in Vatican Council II are hypothetical cases only.
This is the conclusion of A.I on ‘X’ in a discussion today afternoon.
The Synods will not be able to support their liberalism with Vatican Council II any more, since the Council will not be liberal any more.
A.I sees overnight change in the Church if Pope Leo approves Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and ethically, whose conclusion is traditional only.
Here is the discussion from A.I
Lionel Andrades’ argument is a theological provocation rather than a neutral analysis. It hinges on a single, contested premise: that Vatican II becomes “conservative” (even “ecclesiocentric” and medieval) once one rejects what he calls the “irrational” interpretation of certain texts—specifically, …Altro
If AI is worth its salt then it will recognize that the Council of Nicaea is overriding including Canon 6 which granted the Eastern Churches ADMINISTRATIVE autonomy and Rome MAGISTERIAL authority. It would explain to us that with its main theme of condemning Arianism, the ignoring of the above led to a hardening of heart that contributed to the emergence of Islam, a forward edition of Arianism.
WILL VATICAN COUNCIL RATIONAL CHANGE DONORS ?: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BECOMES CONSERVATIVE.
02.11.2025
WILL VATICAN COUNCIL RATIONAL CHANGE DONORS ?: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BECOMES CONSERVATIVE.
It is important for conservative and traditionalist Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so enter into mainline Catholic theology. Then they can expect donations from the mainstream Catholic Church and not just those who go for the Latin Mass.
With Vatican Council II rational, the liberals have to come into mainline conservatism since the Council is no more liberal.
If they do not adapt to the main conservative Novus Ordo Catholic Church they are choosing schism.The the mainline conservative Church is in harmony with the magisterium over the centuries. At as at present the liberal Catholic Church, depends upon Vatican Council II irrational. This is official schism. It is a break with the Apostles and the Church Fathers.
The National Catholic Reporter, USA and the Tablet, England, have readers and donors today who are liberal Catholics. This is because Vatican Council …Altro
IL CARDINALE BURKE HA CONTRADDITO L’ECCLESIOLOGIA DEL MESSALE ROMANO CON IL CONCILIO VATICANO II IRRAGIONEVOLE.
IL CARDINALE BURKE HA CONTRADDITO L’ECCLESIOLOGIA DEL MESSALE ROMANO CON IL CONCILIO VATICANO II IRRAGIONEVOLE.
Durante la Messa Summorum Pontificum nella Basilica di San Pietro, il Cardinale Raymond Burke ha accettato il Concilio Vaticano II interpretato in modo irragionevole, il che contraddice l’ecclesiologia del Messale Romano.
Egli interpreta il Concilio in modo irragionevole e non razionale, e questo rappresenta una rottura con il Credo Atanasiano. Questo è scisma.
Egli non interpreta il Concilio razionalmente e quindi vi è una rottura con il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Esistono ora due versioni del Credo Niceno, la sua e la mia. La mia è quella originale. La sua prevede eccezioni quando si fa riferimento al battesimo di desiderio.
Questa è la stessa confusione dottrinale condivisa dalla Fraternità San Pio X nella Messa Latina e non vi è alcun commento.
Questa non è la Messa di tutti i tempi; teologicamente è una rottura con la Messa Latina del XVI secolo.
Questa è …Altro
Simbolo atanasiano - Wikipedia
Grazie a Lionel Andrades
LUMEN GENTIUM 14 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 16 ARE HYPOTHETICAL: FERNANDEZ WAS IN SCHISM AND NOT VIGANO’S TRADITION: A RE –TRIAL IS NEEDED BY POPE LEO
31.10.2025
LUMEN GENTIUM 14 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 16 ARE HYPOTHETICAL: FERNANDEZ WAS IN SCHISM AND NOT VIGANO’S TRADITION: A RE –TRIAL IS NEEDED BY POPE LEO
An appeal has to be made to Pope Leo pointing out that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 1965-2025.So they do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX etc. It was Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez who was not affirming the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. He was interpreting Vatican Council II, irrationally. LG 8,14, 16 etc referred to visible exceptions for the dogma EENS etc, fr hm. He did not affirm and EENS and neither Vatican Council II, rational (LG 16 invisible), during the trial for schism of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano..
So for Archbishop Vigano to accept Vatican Council II, Pope Leo must clarify that LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only. They do not contradict the Creeds, Councils and …Altro
I am not a sedevacantist. There I have answered your questions. I am sorry I could not get back to you earlier.
I have removed your post from my site. And I am now blocking you.
CARDINAL BURKE CONTRADICTED THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF THE ROMAN MISSAL WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL.
30-10.2025
CARDINAL BURKE CONTRADICTED THE ECCLESIOLOGY OF THE ROMAN MISSAL WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL.
At the Summorum Pontificum Mass at St. Peter’s Basilica Cardinal Raymond Burke accepted Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally which contradicts the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal.
He interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and this is a rupture with the Athanasius Creed. This is schism.
He does not interpret the Council rationally and so there is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
There are now two versions of the Nicene Creed, his and mine. Mine is the original. His has exceptions when there is a reference to the baptism of desire.
This is the same doctrinal chaos shared by the Society of St. Pius X at the Latin Mass and there is no comment.
This is not the Mass of the Ages; theologically it is a rupture with the Latin Mass of the 16th century.
This is a politically correct Mass. The same as the Novus Ordo Mass.
-Lionel Andrades…Altro
APPEAL TO POPE LEO TO CORRECT THE 1949 LOHO MISTAKE : DECLARE LG 14 AND 16 AS ONLY HYPOTHETICAL IN 2025
APPEAL TO POPE LEO TO CORRECT THE 1949 LOHO MISTAKE AND DECLARE LG 14 AND 16 AS ONLY HYPOTHETICAL IN 2025 : 103 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
30.10.2025
This is a sample petition to Pope Leo XIV which John Henry Westen and others could send to the pope.
To:
His Holiness Pope Leo XIV,
Vatican City.
Dear Holy Father,
We the undersigned Catholics and non Catholics appeal to you to please announce that Lumen Gentium 14, being saved with the baptism of desire , and Lumen Gentium 16, being saved in invincible ignorance, refer to hypothetical cases. They refer to invisible people in 1965-2025. We will not be able to see or meet someone saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance, and with a good conscience, outside the Church, in 2025-2026. If anyone is saved as such it would only be known to God.
So kindly clarify the obvious, what is common knowledge, - that LG 14 and LG 16 refer to theoretical cases and not objectively known people in our human reality in the present times. …Altro
JOHN HENRY WESTEN MUST FILE A PETITION ON VATICAN COUNCI II : THE LIBERALS ARE IN SCHISM
29.10.2025
JOHN HENRY WESTEN MUST FILE A PETITION ON VATICAN COUNCI II: THE LIBERALS ARE IN SCHISM : 102 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED )
102. A John Henry Westen petition is needed on Vatican Council II ?
John Henry Westen often files petitions and appeals and has even come to Rome with them. He could inform Pope Leo in a new appeal that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only.They refer to invisible people in 2025.So this is how he would interpret Vatican Council II.
He could then have a list of people who also interpret LG 8, 14, 16 etc, in the same way.
That LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 refer to invisible cases in 2025-2026 is common sense. It is something obvious. But the New Theology has its foundation on LG 14 and LG 16 referring to physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church. Then it is assumed that there are exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the …Altro
THE VATICAN VISITATION OF THE EMMANUEL COMMUNITY IS NOT APOSTOLIC. IRRATIONAL INTERPRETATIONS PRODUCE SCHISM
28.10.2025
THE VATICAN VISITATION OF THE EMMANUEL COMMUNITY IS NOT APOSTOLIC. IRRATIONAL INTERPRETATIONS PRODUCE SCHISM : 101 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED )
101.The visitation of the Emmanuel community is not apostolic with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally ?
There should be an apostolic visitation of the diocese of Charlotte, Detroit and Fort Worth, USA and the bishops must be asked to 1) interpret Vatican Council II rationally and 2) affirm the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which no more exceptions from Vatican Council II. There is to be an apostolic visitation of the Emmanuel community. Like Bishop Dominique Rey, an active member of the community, they are not traditionalists and they also interpret the Council irrationally, like the visitors. If they interpreted the Council rationally there could not be a visitation. The visitation happens only because groups, visitors and the visited interpret the Council with the false premise which …Altro
The visitation is not apostolic since the magisterium over the centuries affirmed the Athanasiuis Cred etc with no exceptions and this is not being done by the visitors. We also now know that the Council and Catechism can be interpreted rationally and in harmony with apostolic teaching. This is not being done by the visitors.
The passages in red are hypothetical. They refer to invisible people. The passages in blue are orthodo. They are aligned with the dogma exrtra ecclesiam nulla salus and the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal. An invisible person cannot be a visible example of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2025. He cannot be a practical excepton for the dogma exrtra ecclesiam nulla salus. He cannot be an objective exception for Ad Gentes 7 ( blue) which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
So Vatican Council II in the red passages does not contrdict Tradition. It has a continuity with Tradition. Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2 etc are not exceptions. This is the ratiional way of reading Vatican Council II. The conclusiion is traditional. But the for ecclesiastics who form Vatican visitations to the dioceses the red passages contradict the blue. So they imply that the red passages refer to visible cases of non Catholics saved …Altro
THE SSPX AND CANCELLED PRIESTS CAN DEMAND RECOGNITION SINCE VATICAN COUNCIL II NOW SUPPORTS THE CONSERVATIVES
28.10.2025
THE SSPX AND CANCELLED PRIESTS CAN DEMAND RECOGNITION SINCE VATICAN COUNCIL II NOW SUPPORTS THE CONSERVATIVES : 100 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED )
100. Can the SSPX and Cancelled Priests demand canonical recognition?
Yes. Since Vatican Council II is no more an issue for the conservatives. The Council can only be interpreted rationally. This is the only ethical option available. It is the liberals who are in schism i.e. Cardinals Farrell, Cupich, Fernandez and Roche. The Council is no more a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. The Catechism of Pope John Paul II is in harmony with all the catechisms interpreted rationally.
99. What about Cardinal Cupich’s new appointment?
He does not accept Vatican Council II. He is a modernist. He does not interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally. This is public schism. It is a type of apostasy. He is a modernist. Why must I …Altro
CARDINAL CUPICH DOES NOT ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II. HE DOES NOT INTERPRET THE CREEDS RATIONALLY. THIS IS SCHISM
28.10.2025
CARDINAL CUPICH DOES NOT ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II. HE DOES NOT INTERPRET THE CREEDS RATIONALLY. THIS IS SCHISM : 99 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)
99. What about Cardinal Cupich’s new appointment?
He does not accept Vatican Council II. He is a modernist. He does not interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally. This is public schism. It is a type of apostasy. He is a modernist. Why must I attend his Holy Mass in Rome when he does not end this scandal. - Lionel Andrades
27.10.2025
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYITE EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION : 98 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
If there is a table before me and I see a chair then my observation is wrong. If I mistake a window for a door then this is an error of observation. It is an objective mistake. This is not philosophy or theology. It is a physically observable mistake. It is a wrong way of physically looking at something. So …Altro
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYIT EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION.
27.10.2025
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYITE EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION : 98 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
If there is a table before me and I see a chair then my observation is wrong. If I mistake a window for a door then this is an error of observation. It is an objective mistake. This is not philosophy or theology. It is a physically observable mistake. It is a wrong way of physically looking at something. So if 10 people see a table and the 11th sees a chair instead, then his reality is different. It is an empirical mistake. It is a mistake in space and time.
In general people do not make this mistake. They call a chair a chair and a table a table. Observation is normal.
But in 1949 a Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston was issued from Rome. It wrongly suggested that we humans can see someone saved with the baptism of desire. But today we know that we cannot physically see …Altro
Yes only Vatican Council II rational can be affirmed rationally.
THE INSTITUTE FOR ECUMENICAL STUDIES AT THE ANGELICUM IN ROME INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY
25.10.2025
THE INSTITUTE FOR ECUMENICAL STUDIES AT THE ANGELICUM IN ROME INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY ? : 97 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
97. The Institute for Ecumenical Studies in Rome at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally?
The Institute for Ecumenical Studies at the Angelicam is based upon irrational and heretical, Vatican Council II irrational instead of Vatican Council II rational. The Council interpreted rationally is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), of the Council of Florence 1442.The Institute was originally founded by a Jewish Left rabbi who interpreted the Council liberally and politically.
The Dominican priest-professors know that Vatican Council II is being interpreted irrationally. But they continue with the error to avoid the Anti Semitic charge and so not be able to teach anymore.
There is big money being put into the Catholic Church to prop …Altro
With Vatican Council II irrational liberal bishops are on the offensive but with the Council rational they are on the defensive
25.10.2025
With Vatican Council II irrational liberal bishops are on the offensive but with the Council rational they are on the defensive: 96 Questions and Answers ( Updated)
96. With Vatican Council II irrational bishops are on the offensive and with Vatican Council II rational they are on the defensive?
If you get the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano theology out of the way sparks would fly in the dioceses. Cardinal Arthur Roche could no more put down the Traditional Latin Mass. The TLM could not be closed in the name of the Lefebvre’s Vatican Council II. It is the New Theology of the bisbhops, cardinals and the pope.
Now the New Theology has been identified .We simply avoid it.
Orthodoxy dominates in Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Morally, there is no other choice for Cardinal Roche.
With Vatican Council II irrational the New Missal is schismatic.
With Vatican Council II rational, the Council is aligned with the Roman Missal, and Vatican Council II, liberal and the bishop …Altro
The diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II
24.10.2025
THE BISHOP MUST USE THE L.A INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IN CHARLOTTE : 95 QUESTIONS ANS ANSWERS (UPDATED)
95. The diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
Yes the diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Latin Mass groups in Charlotte must continue to affirm Tradition of the Roman Missal but they must avoid the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the bishop and Lefebvre-Kwasniewski and Vigano.
Without this common interpretation the bishop cannot demand an end of the Latin Mass. The bishop will know that the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal is contradicted by Vatican Council II as interpreted by Lefebvre and the sedevacantist bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas.
Canonically and legally to remain a bishop, he must affirm Vatican Council II rationally like me and also affirm the ecclesiology of …Altro