en.news

The Unsettled Origins of the Novus Ordo - A Bishop’s Warning Ahead of the Consistory

The consistory of cardinals expected in June is supposed to reflect on the historical details of the liturgical reform. This is what the Swiss auxiliary bishop Marian Eleganti writes on his blog (June 26).

Bishop Eleganti reiterates the historical facts.

1965: A revised Ordo Missae was published — a transitional version of the old Mass following the first impulses of Vatican II.

1967: An experimental draft (Missa normativa) was presented but not approved.

The first Synod of Bishops after the Council was divided over this rite. About 71 bishops voted in favor (placet), 43 voted against (non placet), and 62 regarded it only as a basis for discussion. Despite this divided response, work on the new missal continued.

1969: The new missal (Missale Romanum) was promulgated, today known as the Novus Ordo Missae. It implemented changes that had been rejected by a majority of the bishops at the 1967 Synod.

The change in the direction of celebration and the introduction of the people’s altar were not envisaged by the Council.

Bishop Eleganti: “The loss of sacredness and verticality in the liturgy in many celebrations, the insufficient centrality of God and the dominance of the congregation, a certain banalization of the sacred, of the liturgical space and liturgical vestments, the marginalization of the tabernacle, the one-sided emphasis on the meal character and on the congregation as the subject of the liturgy — all of this needs to be reconsidered!”

He hopes that Pope Leo XIV will first bring the cardinals, ahead of the upcoming consistory, to the necessary level of historical knowledge on liturgical matters. They should not deliberate on issues whose history of development they do not know sufficiently well in detail. As such details, Bishop Eleganti also mentions the role of Archbishop Annibale Bugnini and the Protestant influence in the reconceptualization of the Novus Ordo.

Conclusion:
“Let us hope for the insight of the Pope and the cardinals. In Rome, for years now, one has been listening and also shaping the universal Church accordingly. But what exactly they are hearing remains unclear. In burning questions, one still does not know in which direction things are heading.”

#newsXhymfnxplq
4872
ninasandoval9 shares this
41
SonoftheChurch

Sad and most unfortunate that he’s just an Auxiliary Bishop without jurisdiction. He would have made a great Ordinary. And an even greater Cardinal.

philosopher shares this

Unsettled Origins of the Novus Ordo

113
mccallansteve

The Novus Ordo: Satan's crowning achievement in his endeavor to destroy the Church.

From what I have read, much voting was done outside hours when most of the bishops were away. Also lying took place (Pope Paul approves this) and (the bishops are all for it). Because it was rammed through illegally, the changes can be said to be illegitimate.

P. O'B

Almost amazing but good news that after sixty years of Vatican blather some churchmen still can see reality and talk about it.