en.news
41.7K

Bishop Nann Apologises To Gänswein, Fights for "Church of Council"

To criticise Archbishop Gänswein was a "serious mistake," Caravelí Bishop Reinhold Nann, 59, Peru, writes on ReinholdNann.Blogspot.com (February 17).

He was surprised by the feedback, deleted his post, and apologises to Gänswein, citing "events in the Vatican" as the reason for the article.

According to Nann, there are two "views of the Church." There is the "Church of the Culture War" where a holy remnant closes itself off behind walls against the "evil world." And there is the "Church of the Council" which is building bridges to this [evil] world.

Nann vows to make every effort to support the "Church of the Council" which has been a walking disaster from its beginning.

Picture: © reinholdnann.blogspot.com, #newsAtiledibkl

GChevalier
In general, the conciliar members are flat as pancakes: when they say something good, which sometimes happens to them, a second later they get lost in excuses and crawl belly down to the ground in adoration before the world, as the cursed Vatican II taught them.
mattsixteen24
@Thors Catholic Hammer Here is the other pope.
When the Pope becomes the chaplain of Masonry
www.traditioninaction.org/…/A257rcRatz_UN.h…
Thors Catholic Hammer
Bishop Nann is really saying there are two popes. :[1] A pope of the "Church of the Culture War" where a holy remnant closes itself off behind walls against the "evil world." And [2] a pope of the "Church of the Council" which is building bridges to this [evil] world.
HOWEVER THERE CAN NOT BE TWO POPES AND ONE OF THEM MUST BE AN IMPOSTER.
Any alleged pope who produces formally heretical material …More
Bishop Nann is really saying there are two popes. :[1] A pope of the "Church of the Culture War" where a holy remnant closes itself off behind walls against the "evil world." And [2] a pope of the "Church of the Council" which is building bridges to this [evil] world.

HOWEVER THERE CAN NOT BE TWO POPES AND ONE OF THEM MUST BE AN IMPOSTER.

Any alleged pope who produces formally heretical material in an official magisterial document must be an imposter.
The only alleged pope in the history of the church to have ever done that is bergolio who uses the name "francis". His heretical document is named Amoris laetitiae

Hence the only true Pope in the Vatican at the moment LOGICALLY must be Benedict XV1.

[UNFORTUNATELY BENEDICT IS UNDER A FORM OF SOFT HOUSE ARREST AND NO LONGER A FREE AGENT.
His minder Ganswein makes all sorts of claims about what Pope Benedict writes and has seen and could only make such claims were he monitoring Pope Benedict 24/24/
Ultraviolet
Guess who got a call from a Vatican official discussing the very real possibility of a transfer to Nigeria or some other Ebola-ridden pesthole? ;-)