Coronavirus: “Church 3.0 Is Atheistic”

"The essentials of the Tridentine and Novus Ordo mass rites are identical."

Since you haven't defined "the essentials", your claim is meaningless Thors Catholic Hammer You're good at inventing entirely arbitrary qualifications like "the essentials". As defined by whom? You? No.

This is one of your standard rhetorical tricks. That way you can then dismiss every real and substantial difference as a "non-essential", dancing around the truth by re-defining it as you like.

A side by side comparison shows just how many "essentials" are different.

lms.org.uk/missals

"If then you are one of these Latin mass fanatics you will have to also believe..."

...said the argumentative Novus Ordo fan-boy as he tried to over-compensate for his watered down Mass and tragic parody of Communion.

So-called "Latin Mass fanatics" aren't comfortable seeing the Eucharist treated with such little reverence. You obviously are.

The Blessed Sacrament isn't a potato-crisp to be casually flipped into someone's hands by a fellow parishioner who probably didn't even go to confession any more than you did.

@elbow

The Tridentine rite I allude to is understood by normal people to refer to the Latin mass rite of St Pius V and as utilized in the Latin Roman Catholic Church for around 4 hundred years until the 1960s.
(It’s essentials replicate those of the Novus Ordo Paul vi rite)
However since you are not a normal person but one of these religious fanatics seeking to pedantically define every word I do not expect you to understand any of these matters.

@Ultrviolet.
.
The essentials of the mass of Paul Vi ( NovusOrdo) and the Tridentine rite as its commonly known are the same.
Pedants like you are unable to discern the common basics of the Latin rite mass of St Pius V ( itself a novelty) and the Novus Ordo rite of Paul V1.
You are mired in a jungle of spiritual ignorance concerning the most elementary knowledge of the catholic sacrifice of the mass.
Hurling abuse and insults at your betters is the only defense mechanism you present as rational argument and logic eludes you.

The Tridentine rite I allude to is understood by normal people...

LOLOL. Thor's Rhetorical Trick #28: Fabricate "support" for a statement absent proof. Voice the fabrication using passive voice verbs to imply factual legitimacy.

Like so: It is well recognized by most intelligent readers the tactic I allude to are your poor substitute for arguing a point in an effective manner with factual evidence supplied in support of it. :D

" but one of these religious fanatics seeking to pedantically define every word...

It's funny getting called a "religious fanatic" by a Catholic who doesn't recognize the Pope, denies the legitimacy of every cleric who does recognize the Pope, claims the previous Pope didn't resign, ignores the previous Pope's own words when the man repeatedly insists that he did.

It's even funnier when that same Catholic insists there's no "essential" difference between two Masses when a side-by-side comparison demonstrates otherwise.

Nah, I'm not a fanatic, Crackers. I'm just wise to your playbook of bad rhetorical tricks. You LOVE inventing qualifications like "the essentials" where they don't exist so YOU can then define them.

This was me calling out your hand before you played it.

"are unable to discern the common basics of the Latin rite mass of St Pius V ( itself a novelty) and the Novus Ordo rite of Paul V1."

That's you repeating your last unproven claim and subsituting "the essentials" with "the common basics".

You're just parroting yourself on the same post Thors Catholic Hammer