Well Christ Himself approved of St. Peter who was married.
It is also suggested that some of the other apostles were also married.
Indeed the ban on priests getting married was not in existence for around the first millennium of the catholic church’s history.
So yeah, maybe the AntiChrist approves of married clergy but so what when we know that Christ Himself selected a married man to be His first Vicar on Earth.

@Thors Catholic Hammer St. Peter was likely a widower. It is false to say that priests were allowed to get married. Even in the Eastern Church today priests are not allowed to marry. Married men were allowed to become priest on certain conditions, but a priest cannot get married. On speaking of priestly celibacy:

St. Epiphanius of Salamis (ca. 315-403): "It is the Apostles themselves who decreed this law."

Pope Siricius (384-99) states “ All of us, priests and deacons, are bound together from the day of our ordination, and held to put our hearts and our bodies to the service of sobriety and purity; may we be pleasing to God in all things, in the sacrifices we offer daily” - Directa to Himerus

Pope St. Innocent I (401-417) that : "This is not a matter of imposing upon the clergy new and arbitrary obligations, but rather of reminding them of those (obligations) which the tradition of the Apostles and the Fathers has transmitted to us."

St. Jerome (ca. 342-420): "Priests and deacons must be either virgins or widowers before being ordained, or at least observe perpetual continence after their ordination.... If married men find this difficult to endure, they should not turn against me, but rather against Holy Writ and the entire ecclesiastical order."

www.catholicapologetics.info/…/celibacy.htm

Council of Elvira, A.D. 306, Canon XXXIII
27. A bishop or other cleric may have only a sister or a daughter who is a virgin consecrated to God living with him. No other woman who is unrelated to him may remain.

33. Bishops, presbyters, deacons, and others with a position in the ministry are to abstain completely from sexual intercourse with their wives and from the procreation of children. If anyone disobeys, he shall be removed from the clerical office.

Council of Nicaea, A.D. 325, Canon III
The great Council has stringently forbidden any bishop, priest, deacon, or any of the clergy, to have a woman living with him, except a mother, sister, aunt, or some such person who is beyond all suspicion.

Directa Decretal of Pope St. Siricius, A.D. 10 February 385
8-11 That married men, after ordination, are not to cohabit with their wives.

Council of Carthage, A.D. 387 or 390, Canon III
Aurelius the bishop said: When at the past council the matter on continency and chastity was considered, those three grades, which by a sort of bond are joined to chastity by their consecration, to wit bishops, presbyters, and deacons, so it seemed that it was becoming that the sacred rulers and priests of God as well as the Levites, or those who served at the divine sacraments, should be continent altogether, by which they would be able with singleness of heart to ask what they sought from the Lord: so that what the apostles taught and antiquity kept, that we might also keep.

They did refute it. Church has never taught Baptism of Desire in her Magisterial Teaching. In light of such facts, and the fact that you are familiar with what Bro. Dimonds irrefutably present, I must say that you are a liar. You are a tool that Satan uses, and you are a follower of men headed to hell. You are not a follower of God.

That page contains lies, heresies and falsehoods. People should get this book, where true arguments are presented: www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/outside-the-chu…

@mattsixteen24 @O Maoleoin You are both tool that Satan uses to attack true Catholic position, lie and smear. Dimond Brothers are not guilty of private interpretation, they defend Church's teaching, the Magisterium of Catholic Church. By the way, the nonsense with soul of church, furthermore the man-made doctrines of baptism of blood and baptism of desire are not so much present in Eastern Catholic churches. In light of such facts, opinion of men, even of theologians have to be put aside, in case when it can be proven from Catholic doctrine that such opinion is not compatible with Catholic Teaching. So, in your pride you are rash, you are wrong and impious, and you are headed to hell you heretic(s).

@KristianKeller The dimond brothers tell their followers to receive sacraments from the schismatic eastern church as they do.

Just to quote a few below, are you saying these are forgeries? If they are not, then you also declare them to be heretics as well as they hold to the belief of baptism of desire and blood.

St. Cyprian, Church Father (3rd Century): The Epistles of Cyprian, Epistle LXXII: "Let men of this kind, who are aiders and favourers of heretics, know therefore, first, that those catechumens hold the sound faith and truth of the Church, and advance from the divine camp to do battle with the devil, with a full and sincere acknowledgment of God the Father, and of Christ, and of the Holy Ghost; then, that they certainly are not deprived of the sacrament of baptism who are baptized with the most glorious and greatest baptism of blood".

St. John Chrystostome, Church Father and Doctor of the Church (4th Century): Panegyric on St. Lucianus, "Do not be surprised that I should equate martyrdom with baptism; for here too the spirit blows with much fruitfulness, and a marvellous and astonishing remission of sins and cleansing of the soul is effected; and just as those who are baptized by water, so, too, those who suffer martyrdom are cleansed with their own blood."

St. Gregory Nazianzen, Church Father and Doctor of the Church (4th Century): Oration XXXIX, Oration on the Holy Lights: "I know also a Fourth Baptism--that by Martyrdom and blood, which also Christ himself underwent; and this one is far more august than all the others, inasmuch as it cannot be defiled by after-stains."

St. Bonaventure, Doctor of the Church (13th century): In Sent. IV, d.4,P.2,a.I,q.I: “God obliges no one to do the impossible and therefore it must be admitted that the baptism of desire without the baptism of water is sufficient, provided the person in question has the will to receive the baptism of water, but is prevented from doing so before he dies."

St. Alphonsus Liguori, Doctor of the Church (18th century): Moral Theology, Book 6, Section II (About Baptism and Confirmation), Chapter 1 (On Baptism), page 310, no. 96: "Baptism of desire is perfect conversion to God by contrition or love of God above all things accompanied by an explicit or implicit desire for true baptism of water, the place of which it takes as to the remission of guilt, but not as to the impression of the [baptismal] character or as to the removal of all debt of punishment. It is called "of wind" ["flaminis"] because it takes place by the impulse of the Holy Ghost who is called a wind ["flamen"]. Now it is "de fide" that men are also saved by Baptism of desire, by virtue of the Canon Apostolicam, "de presbytero non baptizato" and of the Council of Trent, session 6, Chapter 4 where it is said that no one can be saved 'without the laver of regeneration or the desire for it.'" (Note: Unbelievers can see the original book in Latin here. Turn to page 310 in the book (or page 157 of the PDF file).

Moral Theology, Bk. 6, nn. 95-97: "Baptism of blood is the shedding of one's blood, i.e. death, suffered for the faith or for some other Christian virtue. Now this Baptism is comparable to true baptism because, like true Baptism, it remits both guilt and punishment as it were ex opere operato… Hence martyrdom avails also for infants seeing that the Church venerates the Holy Innocents as true martyrs. That is why Suarez rightly teaches that the opposing view is at least temerarious."

On the Council of Trent, 1846, Pg. 128-129 (Duffy): "Who can deny that the act of perfect love of God, which is sufficient for justification, includes an implicit desire of Baptism, of Penance, and of the Eucharist. He who wishes the whole wishes the every part of that whole and all the means necessary for its attainment. In order to be justified without baptism, an infidel must love God above all things, and must have an universal will to observe all the divine precepts, among which the first is to receive baptism: and therefore in order to be justified it is necessary for him to have at least an implicit desire of that sacrament."

Pope Pius IX (19th century): Quanto Conficiamur Moerore, 1863: “There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments.”