en.news
292.1K

Viganò: Cardinal Told Friends That 2013 Conclave Was Invalid

There is an urgent need to put an end to the "coup d’état” of the 2013 conclave, Archbishop Viganò, 82, told CatholicFamilyNews (August 11).

Viganò who seems to regard Francis as an anti-pope, says that a cardinal told friends that during the 2013 conclave he witnessed facts that made Bergoglio's election "null and void".

But this cardinal does not want to say this in public, so as not to break the papal secret - "the secret that he has already broken by talking about it with those who cannot do anything about it", Viganò adds.

#newsKshrvvvwga

LiveJohn
CIONCI NAILS IT! 🇬🇧 DIES IRAE - Nothing but the truth about Benedict XVI's resignation
Note the 5 point synopsis after the video.
Live Mike
@SonoftheChurch I suspect Viganò's comments were meant to be the impetus for opening an investigation and only after such an authoritative investigative body had been established will the identity of the individual cardinal be made public. Why the secrecy? Because, were his name to be revealed before then, that cardinal would have a very short time to live.
Yes, the “Dubia” Cardinals MIGHT HAVE …More
@SonoftheChurch I suspect Viganò's comments were meant to be the impetus for opening an investigation and only after such an authoritative investigative body had been established will the identity of the individual cardinal be made public. Why the secrecy? Because, were his name to be revealed before then, that cardinal would have a very short time to live.

Yes, the “Dubia” Cardinals MIGHT HAVE KNOWN but certainly one should not presume that they would have known... I'm sorry.
SonoftheChurch
@Live Mike Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way. There can be no sort of “impetus” leading to an investigation if there is not first established a foundation of credibility and validity for the allegations put forth by an accuser. There must be at least a modicum of truth and veracity determined on the part of those who are bringing into question something as enormously serious and eternally …More
@Live Mike Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way. There can be no sort of “impetus” leading to an investigation if there is not first established a foundation of credibility and validity for the allegations put forth by an accuser. There must be at least a modicum of truth and veracity determined on the part of those who are bringing into question something as enormously serious and eternally impactful as the legitimacy of a sitting Pontificate, which, as you clearly must know, irreversibly affects the immortal souls of billions.

Particularly when the allegations are as incredibly outrageous and sensitive as these are, and even more particularly when the accuser is known throughout the planet as a maddened, rabid, frothing-at-the-mouth provocateur, who delights in throwing proverbial live grenades into gas filled rooms like a monkey throwing its feces at visitors in a zoo, and whose mind is soiled deeply with the galling bitterness of sour-grapes resulting from the wreckage of a bright, promising ecclesiastical career that was unexpectedly and disastrously derailed. We all know and have been innocent victims of the Archbishop’s enraged verbal retribution that he’s unleashed upon the Church lately, as he spews and vomits oceans of venomous vitriol upon his perceived enemies in a poisoned bitterness that is birthed from the fact that he has been denied the cherished “Red Hat” which he is convinced he richly and rightfully deserves.

Therefore, he will NOT be believed nor taken seriously by anyone of note who may be in a position to bring redress to this situation, or who may be empowered with the proper and appropriate competencies to take effective measures in the corrective pursuit of the concerns which he says he seeks to aright…..UNLESS and UNTIL he dispels the obscuring cloud of silence and secrecy and actually names his source, openly, publicly and without hesitation or reservation. At which time, it can then be determined whether or not the Cardinal-Elector who is the alleged witness to the crimes of the Conclave is himself trustworthy and credible. Until such a thing as that happens, the Archbishop and his allegations will continue to be largely ignored and discounted as simply the shrill screechings of a disaffected Vatican has-been who only wants to stir up trouble at every opportunity because he’s been cast aside and no longer commands the respect nor holds the influence he once held.

And as it regards the subject of security and protection for the individual(s) making the allegations after their names and identities have been publicly revealed, if those who hold the levels of authority in the Vatican of such a nature required to initiate an inquiry into the purported illegitimacy of a ruling Supreme Pontiff and the 10 year reign of his Pontificate in the first place, with the mandate to address and resolve all findings from their investigation, are not able or strong enough to vouch for and guarantee the personal safety and physical integrity of Cardinal-Electors who would most assuredly be considered as prime and essential legal witnesses to the most heinous crime ever committed in our modern age, then it is inconceivable that those very same authoritative figures or agencies would hold the power necessary to act effectively on the results of their findings, and if need be, depose a false Pope and cleanse and restore Holy Mother Church. If you can’t even protect your chief witness or witnesses, then clearly you don’t have what it takes bring and enforce Justice and ensure that it prevails.

Such a non-starter would only magnify the sad, debilitating weakness and impotence of the investigative authority itself, and would serve to hamstring and handicap any process so established. Consequently, the best and most effective guarantee of protection for any witness involved in this matter would be the blazing light of public exposure, meaning: the immediate announcement of the names and identities of all sources of verifiable information, with a full, unabridged and transparent accounting of their testimony and a complete uncovering of all known facts. This would be the best and only way to ensure the protection of those who would come forward to confirm and prove the allegations. So, the issue of safety is not a justification for the Archbishop and his source to remain silent behind a wall of secrecy. The accuser-Cardinal must be revealed or this entire unlikely story will swiftly sink like the Titanic into a sea of scornful disbelief and implausibly.

And further, until trusted, truthful, holy men, faithful and devout, such as Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Müller, or Cardinal Sarah or any of the other orthodox, conservative, tradition-minded Princes of the Church (or even some verified additional written statement left by the late, great Cardinal Pell) who were all there - actually THERE - before, during and after the Conclave, steps forward and boldly proclaims to the whole Church and before the entire world that the Papal Election of 2013 which placed Pope Francis upon the Apostolic Throne of Saint Peter as the Vicar of Christ and the Chief Shepherd of Holy Mother Church, was ILLEGAL, and thus INVALID, and that the man currently known, accepted, respected, obeyed and submitted to by the universal Church as the Bishop of Rome, is a false pretender, a ravenous wolf in Shepherd’s clothing, and that his entire 10 year Pontificate is ILLEGITIMATE and has been a monstrous, unspeakable, abominable LIE that horribly deceived, disfigured and crippled the whole world, and must therefore immediately be abrogated and cast down, then I will continue to believe that what the Archbishop has alleged is utter nonsense spoken from a corrupted and polluted heart, and that Francis is, was, and until his death or abdication, will continue to be, Pope.
LiveJohn
@Live Mike, @SonoftheChurch Probably too late for any investigation. These latest developments point to Divine Intervention (terrifying), as the most likely solution to the crisis. I expect the situation to get much worse before it comes and agree with Dr Maria's earlier comments although for different reasons.
Rafał_Ovile
SonoftheChurch since when did you receive the gift of seeing into people's hearts ?
"...the Archbishop has alleged is utter nonsense spoken from a corrupted and polluted heart,"...
SonoftheChurch
@Rafał_Ovile Fortunately, I don’t need such a gift. Our Lord Himself made it clear, that a person’s own words reveal and exposes what’s deep inside of them.
“O generation of vipers, how can you speak good things, whereas you are evil? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. A good man out of a good treasure bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of an evil treasure …More
@Rafał_Ovile Fortunately, I don’t need such a gift. Our Lord Himself made it clear, that a person’s own words reveal and exposes what’s deep inside of them.

“O generation of vipers, how can you speak good things, whereas you are evil? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. A good man out of a good treasure bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of an evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment.”
St. Matthew 12:34-36
Live Mike
@SonoftheChurch You may have been unaware that in a certain Archdiocese in the US their legal team has become so paranoid against lawsuits that an accusatory letter against a priest, written by an anonymous source, is enough to launch an investigation of that priest (along with the "presumption of guilt until proven innocent"). As a matter of fact, I know this has happened and is happening in at …More
@SonoftheChurch You may have been unaware that in a certain Archdiocese in the US their legal team has become so paranoid against lawsuits that an accusatory letter against a priest, written by an anonymous source, is enough to launch an investigation of that priest (along with the "presumption of guilt until proven innocent"). As a matter of fact, I know this has happened and is happening in at least one Archdiocese in the US. In this case, the identity of the author is less important than the possibility of wrong doing - real or imaginary, hence the investigation. Many of us realize this is not the proper manner of the law but it has become the norm there. In essence, it now works that way - rightly or wrongly. Certainly, this type of thing happening in a certain Metropolitan See would be well known to the former nuncio of the US.
SonoftheChurch
@LiveJohn I agree with you totally. Divine intervention is the ONLY hope for the Church. Unceasing prayer, fasting, and an unrelenting, unmovable faith in the power of Almighty God, with an unalterable conviction for holiness and charity, and a firm determination and devotion established upon His immutable promises, are the only pillars which will uphold us and bear us up into victory during this …More
@LiveJohn I agree with you totally. Divine intervention is the ONLY hope for the Church. Unceasing prayer, fasting, and an unrelenting, unmovable faith in the power of Almighty God, with an unalterable conviction for holiness and charity, and a firm determination and devotion established upon His immutable promises, are the only pillars which will uphold us and bear us up into victory during this most difficult and challenging age. May God, in the vastness of His mercies, save us.
LiveJohn
@SonoftheChurch Thank you for your reply.The enormity of what lies ahead is truly staggering.
Rafał_Ovile
SonoftheChurch your assertion about abp. Vigano's heart lacks charity and is false. No other Churchmen has exposed and conveyed more clearly the deeper american network (state) behind the "Catholic Spring". Its end was the attack against Church and pope Benedict XVI causing him to abdicate the ministry (not munus) for takeover by Bergoglio .. Finallly he revealed much more facts in his writings that …More
SonoftheChurch your assertion about abp. Vigano's heart lacks charity and is false. No other Churchmen has exposed and conveyed more clearly the deeper american network (state) behind the "Catholic Spring". Its end was the attack against Church and pope Benedict XVI causing him to abdicate the ministry (not munus) for takeover by Bergoglio .. Finallly he revealed much more facts in his writings that will remain a priceless treasure for Mother Church... ... Finally your biblical citation is out of context since Our Lord also specifies who has His permission of judgment as such...
SonoftheChurch
@Rafał_Ovile What you state is utterly, PATENTLY false, and of course, I disagree vehemently with all of your dangerously erroneous assertions. It is blazingly apparent that your monumental arrogance is only eclipsed by the enormity of your invincible ignorance, and the prodigious idiocy by which you are clearly blinded. Nevertheless, I won’t waste time nor effort debating you in this forum, which …More
@Rafał_Ovile What you state is utterly, PATENTLY false, and of course, I disagree vehemently with all of your dangerously erroneous assertions. It is blazingly apparent that your monumental arrogance is only eclipsed by the enormity of your invincible ignorance, and the prodigious idiocy by which you are clearly blinded. Nevertheless, I won’t waste time nor effort debating you in this forum, which, given the paucity of your spiritual formation, would be an exercise in absolute futility. I pity you and all those who are as diabolically deceived as you are, and in charity, will remember you in my prayers.
Rafał_Ovile
SonoftheChurch your private opinions reflect recta ratio disability and disrespect of Catholic dialogue...
SonoftheChurch
If the good Archbishop wishes to regain or retain any sense of legitimacy, and desires to be taken as both truthful and serious, then, given the absolute imperative of this most important and essential spiritual issue, whose very nature holds eternal and irrevocable ramifications for the denouement of the immortal souls of billions of human beings around the globe, then he MUST name and identify …More
If the good Archbishop wishes to regain or retain any sense of legitimacy, and desires to be taken as both truthful and serious, then, given the absolute imperative of this most important and essential spiritual issue, whose very nature holds eternal and irrevocable ramifications for the denouement of the immortal souls of billions of human beings around the globe, then he MUST name and identify the Cardinal from whom he received this uncorroborated information.

It is literally impossible to overstate or exaggerate the overwhelming gravity of the earth shattering, heaven quaking, potentially soul-destroying essence of what he has alleged and would have us all to believe: that a living Cardinal, a Prince of Holy Mother Church, who participated in the 2013 Papal Conclave which elected Pope Francis as the Bishop of Rome and Supreme Pontiff of the universal Church, has possession of personal, direct and explicit knowledge of canonically illicit and unlawful conduct perpetrated by his Brother-Cardinals during the said Conclave; provable, first-hand, experiential knowledge that unquestionably nullifies and invalidates the entire 10-year Pontificate of the sitting Pope, thus erasing and negating every juridical, liturgical and ecclesial act committed in the name of and under the auspices of the current occupant of the Throne of Saint Peter along with all those whom he has empowered and authorized to act on his and the Church’s behalf - the abrogation of every single thing done and every single word uttered; and that this Prince of the Church, who, as a Cardinal-Elector, was present during, and actively participated in, the allegedly “illegal” Conclave and allegedly saw or observed for himself these blasphemous and nefarious illegitimate acts being committed, which, if true, would have immediately and automatically invalidated the election of the Papal Candidate in question and excommunicated latae sententiae both the Candidate and all those who participated in, supported, allowed, or even knew of the hellish scheme and did nothing to expose or to stop it (including, by the way, this very same accuser-Cardinal), and who now, 10 years later, holding fast to this knowledge, wishes to keep it in secret from the whole world and remain anonymous and hidden in obscurity. This is what Archbishop Viganò would have us all to accept and believe.

Therefore, YES, if the Archbishop hopes to be perceived and received as in any way credible, then HE MUST NAME this secret Cardinal and identity him before Holy Mother Church and the whole world, and bring his knowledge of this alleged betrayal, this vile, sordid and unscrupulous deception, this treasonous sacrilege and profanation, the most heinous and monstrous crime, if true, to have ever been committed against mankind in our modern age, portending such dire and eternally immutable consequences so unspeakably damning and damaging that they can hardly be comprehended, to the blazing light of open exposure and public scrutiny.

Because if the Archbishop doesn’t reveal the identity of this Cardinal, and force him to come forward with his full and unabridged testimony along with the fact-based, tangible evidence that proves his eternity-altering allegations which this unknown Cardinal claims to possess, and which would most certainly be required to undo and invalidate a universally acknowledged and accepted Pontificate, then the Archbishop himself is utterly and entirely complicit in the diabolical undermining and overthrow of the Papal Throne and the absolute ruination of the Church herself. His failure or refusal to identify and call out the name of this accuser-Cardinal would be as culpably murderous as if he had thrust a poisoned, filthy, feces-encrusted dagger directly into the beating hearts of the all the Faithful, and with equal effect. He would be, as I’ve long suspected, just another sour grapes-embittered, disingenuous, hypocritical provocateur, steeped in prideful arrogance and dishonesty, an unethical schemer of the lowest, basest type who wields calumny like a weapon, and takes joy in throwing a burning torch into a room soaked in gasoline and stacked with dynamite, and then, runs away with the only known key to the nearest water hydrant. Particularly in as much as he had the temerity to also, boldly and without reservation, reference and connect to this current allegation the as yet unfounded 1958 Papal Conclave conspiracy theory regarding Cardinal Giuseppe Siri and the White and Black smoke supposedly seen from the Sistine Chapel; an unproven tall tale which is constantly vomited out by the hoodwinked and bamboozled adherents of sedevacantism as their mad rationale for abandoning the Church. Such a regurgitation of tainted and spurious drivel totally stains the reliability of his statements and spawns formidable doubt regarding his credibility and even his standing within the Church. Especially since, astoundingly, he infers that he actually believes the 1958 Siri conspiracy theory and must, as a result, be considered a raging sedevacantist himself. An appalling and revolting admission that, I’m sure, shocked us all….who knew?

His first published testimony was informative but ineffective, in view of the fact that either he lied about the existence of the documented proof he claimed would substantiate his allegations against the Holy Father, or he refused to produce the documents he so rigorously contended were available; because there is simply no way possible, given his many years of experience as a shrewd and cunning agent of the Vatican, who had spent his entire ecclesiastical career within the plot-filled, cut-throat, back-stabbing, Machiavellian bowels of the Roman Curia, that he would not have KEPT copies of every single significant document either issued or received by him that might someday prove useful to him in a conflict or dispute, especially one that would involve the highest levels of the Apostolic See itself. Thus, there is no way possible that if he actually POSSESSED the evidentiary documents proving and confirming the inflammatory statements in his first published testimony, he would not have paraded them smugly before the entire planet - which, alas, he did not do; giving irrefutable credence to the belief that such tangible evidence of his heretofore unfounded allegations does not, in fact, exist. Not only that, but his recent hugely partisan political rants and rabid-driven diatribes, which are as unwholesome as explosive diarrhea and just as unceasing, and which have absolutely no relevance with respect to the spiritual state of the Church whatsoever, are massively unproductive and only serve Satan’s purpose in engendering further political strife, contention, confusion, chaos and division among the Faithful.

Thus, you will forgive me if I maintain a healthy skepticism of his shocking and appalling story about this unidentified “Cardinal.” Because to believe the Archbishop would be to believe that a great many holy men, holy Priests, faithful and dedicated Servants of Christ, who have been proven over many years to be men of tremendous truthfulness, honor and integrity, with impeccable and unimpeachable character, honest to a fault even in the face of opposition and detriment, and for whom I have, and have always had, a very high degree of regard, reverence and respect, have - in total contravention of their character - knowingly, willingly and cooperatively allowed an illegal Papal election to take place, which resulted in a false pretender to be elected to the Throne of Saint Peter as his Successor and Chief Shepherd of the Church. There is NO other way to see it. There is no other way possible to realize and understand what the Archbishop is saying here, unless you are prepared to believe and accept the inescapable fact and inevitable reality that every single Cardinal who had any knowledge of this whatsoever, regardless of how minute that knowledge was or at what level of their involvement or when they become aware of it, is fully complicit in what happened and is guilty of what has befallen the Church and the world – and that they all (the senior, conservative ones) had to have known of it. There can be no other way to see this. For, it would be entirely impossible for such a thing to happen in full view and under the very noses of the leading, orthodox, senior Cardinal-Electors of the Church who were present and active participants during the entirety of that Conclave, and they not know of it. It is not conceivable for this to have occurred right there in their very presence, and they failed to recognize what was happening among them or what had already happened. Such a transpiring would be utterly inescapable.

Great and holy Princes of the Church and Defenders of the Faith, such as their Eminences: Cardinal Robert Sarah, Cardinal Gerhard Müller, Cardinal Raymond Burke and the other “Dubia” Cardinals, Walter Brandmüller, the late Carlo Caffarra, and the late Joachim Meisner, along with the late, great, indomitable Cardinal George Pell, were all THERE at the 2013 Conclave, before, during and after, participating in all of the General Congregations of the College of Cardinals and all other proceedings held prior to the sequestering for the actual Conclave itself and all Consistories of Cardinals afterward; and thus, would have KNOWN about these satanic antics if they had, in fact transpired. These pious men of extreme devotion to Christ and His Church, who have spent their entire lifetimes in her service and in the propagation of the Gospel and the promulgation of the Deposit of Faith would never, ever have allowed such a grotesque perversion of Holy Mother Church to occur under their watch. They would have immediately exposed and revealed it, and would NEVER have allowed the illegal election of a pretender to the Holy See as the Bishop of Rome, nor would these men have countenanced a fake, false Pope to misrule and abuse the Church and drive it to damnation and desolation for over 10 years while they sat silently and impotently keeping his illegitimacy a secret, placing themselves under the bane of excommunication latae sententiae, to the repudiation of their own Priesthood and the obliteration of their own personal legacy of lifelong service to the Church.

That such men would be willing to just go along silently with an abomination of this magnitude is unthinkable. The enormity of it would be nothing less than the rape of the Church and the prostitution of the Faithful, and a violent assault on the sanctity of the Blessed Mother herself. Even His Holiness, the Pope Emeritus, would have had to have known of such a foul falsehood, and would have been contaminated by his silent complicity into the very evening and sunset of his life. I absolutely refuse to believe that Benedict would have deigned to enter into eternity having the inescapable Judgement of God before him, carrying with him into the arms of death this burden of iniquity on his shoulders: the sure knowledge that he allowed a falsely elected Pope to reign as a wolf in Shepherd’s clothing over the whole Church in his stead.

In view of all these factors, I must readily conclude that I do not - CANNOT - believe the Archbishop’s accounting. I believe that either he or his anonymous source is lying. However, I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge that the many and varied severe implications of what he alleges in his interview are as such that the very nature and veracity of the Church herself is called into question; creating a despair-fueled vortex of uncertainty and instability that has the potential to become cataclysmic. Such an environment would soon escalate into a situation that is wholly intolerable; and therefore, it must, above all else and with all immediate haste, be addressed and resolved. So yes, for the sake of transparency and truth, by all means, NAME THE CARDINAL, Archbishop Viganò, if you dare…and save the Church.
Rafał_Ovile
SonoftheChurch validity of Conclave as such is irrelevant to the fact there existed in reality pontificate of pope Benedict XVI
until 31.12.2022 who never resigned Petrine Office as such (munus and ministerio) . Thereby any other election of any man until termination of pp BXVI's pontificate is null & void - pending abrogation...
LiveJohn
@Rafał_Ovile Indeed and conveniently overlooked by those seeking to ignore it.
DrMaria
"A time of more severe trials is also coming for the Church. Cardinals will oppose Cardinals and Bishops will oppose Bishops. Satan will enter into their very midst. In Rome, also, will occur great changes. What is rotten falls, and what falls must not be retained. The Church will be obscured, and all the world will be thrown into great confusion." Many consider these or similar words to be in the …More
"A time of more severe trials is also coming for the Church. Cardinals will oppose Cardinals and Bishops will oppose Bishops. Satan will enter into their very midst. In Rome, also, will occur great changes. What is rotten falls, and what falls must not be retained. The Church will be obscured, and all the world will be thrown into great confusion." Many consider these or similar words to be in the real 3rd Secret of Fatima, which the Vatican has not revealed.
john333
What about Paul VI was he secret communist and homosexual?
V.R.S.
Post-conciliar gossipmongering. If the conclave was spurious you had your time to act and raise the alarm (in public not in the occult way) in 2013, Your Most Reverend and Illustrious Eminences. If you failed to act then, well, we have Bergoglio.
Liam Ronan
I think this observation of the Archbishop is astounding as it goes to whether or not Cardinal Siri was chosen as Pope in 1958:"...The indiscretions of these Cardinals focus on the evidence of serious irregularities, without providing further details. I am reminded of what happened in 1958, with the question of the smoke that was initially white and then turned black: it seems that Cardinal Giuseppe …More
I think this observation of the Archbishop is astounding as it goes to whether or not Cardinal Siri was chosen as Pope in 1958:"...The indiscretions of these Cardinals focus on the evidence of serious irregularities, without providing further details. I am reminded of what happened in 1958, with the question of the smoke that was initially white and then turned black: it seems that Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was elected, but then, due to the opposition of the Soviet communist regime, the Fathers were forced to elect another man as Pope, who coincidentally turned out to be the conciliatory Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli." CFN INTERVIEWS VIGANÒ: Francis, Trump, Ukraine, Child Trafficking, and More - Catholic Family News
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
I watched a YouTube post which had actual footage of the 1958 Papal election, where even the Vatican itself said a Pope had been elected, only to have to retract it. I believe Siri was elected, took a papal name, but then was forced to decline. Very sad for the Church.
But according to Vigano now--
"But this cardinal does not want to say this in public, so as not to break the papal secret - "the …More
I watched a YouTube post which had actual footage of the 1958 Papal election, where even the Vatican itself said a Pope had been elected, only to have to retract it. I believe Siri was elected, took a papal name, but then was forced to decline. Very sad for the Church.
But according to Vigano now--

"But this cardinal does not want to say this in public, so as not to break the papal secret - "the secret that he has already broken by talking about it with those who cannot do anything about it", Viganò adds."
Maybe the cardinal just wants the news out there that Bergoglio is an anti-Pope, to cast doubts on him. He's probably afraid for his life if anyone knew who he was...just remember the very suspicious death of the great Cardinal Pell.
Francis' homo VAtican supporters are just like the old-time Mafia. I would not put it past him/them that they got rid of Cardinal Pell.......and would get rid of this Cardinal as well. I hope Archbishop Vigano is safe and protected night and day because now he is at risk. God Bless Him. And all good bishops and Cardinals rising up against Pope Francis.
LiveJohn
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori Expect more confusion to follow as many of the clergy attempt to extricate themselves from their Apostasy.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
@LiveJohn -Do you mean, trying to distance themselves from Bergoglio and his agenda now that the news is out? I hope so. A reaction like that would only mean that these bishops and priests BELIEVE the cardinal's statement. I believe it 100%. I also believe that now the story has been revealed, more that 1 cardinal may cme forward with the same confession....Bergoglio's election was rigged, set up,…More
@LiveJohn -Do you mean, trying to distance themselves from Bergoglio and his agenda now that the news is out? I hope so. A reaction like that would only mean that these bishops and priests BELIEVE the cardinal's statement. I believe it 100%. I also believe that now the story has been revealed, more that 1 cardinal may cme forward with the same confession....Bergoglio's election was rigged, set up, planned.
For sure, that would be the end of "pope" Francis.
LiveJohn
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori Two points:
The answer to your first question is YES.
Your further comment requires a more detailed reply concerning Papal Elections.The authority governing those elections is the 1996 Apostolic Constitution (Papal Bull), 'Universi Dominici Gregis': Universi Dominici Gregis (February 22, 1996) | John Paul II binding on all the Faithful including the Hierarchy and you may be …More
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori Two points:
The answer to your first question is YES.
Your further comment requires a more detailed reply concerning Papal Elections.The authority governing those elections is the 1996 Apostolic Constitution (Papal Bull), 'Universi Dominici Gregis': Universi Dominici Gregis (February 22, 1996) | John Paul II binding on all the Faithful including the Hierarchy and you may be surprised to read later confirmed by Pope Benedict XV1.
Violations of its content immediately results in an Invalid Conclave with the consequent results now before us.
The teething question is where do we go from here? Clearly to the convening of a new election - Right?
But a near impossibility given the composition of a majority of the now doubtful Cardinal electors being stacked with pro - Bergoglio candidates.
Time for a rethink - or even better, a re-evaluation of past conclusions. In1980 at the Marian shrine in Fulda, Germany, Pope John Paul II had this question put to him by a group of visiting pilgrims; "Holy Father why don't you renew the Church? He replied: I can't until the Virgin Comes Again" then holding up his Rosary Beads He went on to say "Here is your Weapon"---- end of quotations.
My dear brother in Christ no need for me to expand on what I have written. Pray daily for the early return of the Most Holy Virgin.
In the Hearts of Jesus & Mary.
LiveJohn.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
@LiveJohn -Thank you very much! I believe very much what you said in the second part. In the first part, I would say, don't be surprised if some Cardinals who are actually good men.....even some Bergoglio cardinals, dig deep into the 2013 proceedings at the conclave and discover that indeed, there were very suspicious things gone on that would invalidate the ten years of Pope Francis.....and thus …More
@LiveJohn -Thank you very much! I believe very much what you said in the second part. In the first part, I would say, don't be surprised if some Cardinals who are actually good men.....even some Bergoglio cardinals, dig deep into the 2013 proceedings at the conclave and discover that indeed, there were very suspicious things gone on that would invalidate the ten years of Pope Francis.....and thus also all Bergoglian cardinals. Still, I think there are maybe a tiny handful, even of Bergoglio cardinals, who would be more interested in finding the truth, than in keeping their red hats. 🤪 🙏
LiveJohn
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori I'd be surprised if any of the current appointments would qualify to vote unless they were endorsed by BXVI's successor. Even given a change of heart on their part; their legitimacy still remains an open question. Apostasy has its price - sadly.
LiveJohn
Explains the present crisis perfectly and the reason for it. Pray like you never have before and prepare for the worst.
steack
Editor’s Note: In this new interview with CFN’s Matt Gaspers, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò comments on a wide variety of topics including the Francis pontificate after ten years, the 2013 Conclave, Donald Trump’s efforts to obtain a second term as President, the Russia-Ukraine war in light of Our Lady’s Fatima Message, child trafficking and the new film Sound of Freedom, and more. “The failures …More
Editor’s Note: In this new interview with CFN’s Matt Gaspers, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò comments on a wide variety of topics including the Francis pontificate after ten years, the 2013 Conclave, Donald Trump’s efforts to obtain a second term as President, the Russia-Ukraine war in light of Our Lady’s Fatima Message, child trafficking and the new film Sound of Freedom, and more. “The failures of the deep church, like those of the deep state, can be hidden and denied, but they are apparent in all of their disastrous consequences,” His Grace says, while emphasizing that in these difficult times we must rely on “the sane (Catholic and Roman) pragmatism which combines the omnipotence of God in deciding the fate of the world with the generous cooperation of man whom He has created and redeemed. In a word, it is the multiplication of the few loaves and fishes.”

INTERVIEW
with Matt Gaspers for “Catholic Family News”

CFN: Your Grace, we are now in the tenth year of Francis’s pontificate. From his comment, “Who am I to judge?” to Amoris Lætitia, from the Abu Dhabi Declaration to the Pachamama incident (and the ongoing Synod on Synodality), we have witnessed truly unprecedented papal scandals over the past decade — scandals touching on both faith and morals. In your opinion, what has been the most damaging affair of this pontificate and how can the Church recover from it?

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò
: It is difficult — and I think many will agree with me — to identify the single issue that has had the most negative influence out of all of Bergoglio’s actions and words. His every gesture is deliberately provocative and histrionic, deliberately designed to leave the interlocutor baffled, or to offend him, or to make fun of him. Those who think that Bergoglio is naïve are mistaken: his every word is spoken with the purpose of arousing scandal, distancing himself from all his predecessors, and criticizing the Church’s past, falsifying it and misrepresenting it with irritating simplifications. And above all: he never affirms. If you have noticed, his most controversial utterances are not the result of an autonomous statement, but the answer to questions asked by others according to the directions they have received, giving the appearance that the topic has been chosen by the interviewer or interlocutor. It is curious, if you pay attention, that all of his most puzzling statements — from “Who am I to judge” to his latest zinger “God loves you as you are” — are answers to questions. Bergoglio himself confirmed this during the press conference returning from Portugal when he said: “Thank you for the courage to ask this question. Thank you” (here).

In practice, regardless of the topic, all Bergoglio’s words are based a priori on a fiction, a lie. In some cases, these manipulations take place with systems that are more elaborate but always dishonest and disloyal: think of the maneuvers to impose his agenda at the recent Synods and his absolute contempt for the rules. Add to this the mocking contempt with which he attributes to other circumstances and other people what he ostentatiously does first himself.

Beyond all of the individual scandals, I believe that the greatest damage done to the Church by this “pontificate” has been the discredit and dishonor that has been thrown on the Papacy, on the Church, on the clergy, and on the faithful. His hatred for Tradition knows no rest, and this necessarily has repercussions on what is a natural expression of that Tradition: doctrine, morality, liturgy, and spirituality. The demolition is systematic and starts mainly from authority, which is corrupt and subservient to the enemy, abusing its power for the opposite purpose to that which legitimizes it. The democratization of the Church, conciliar “collegiality,” and Bergoglio’s “synodality” are all colossal lies, behind which tyranny hides: the parallel with governments subjected to the globalist elite is evident and confirms a single coordination of the two subversive actions. Both institutions, as we see, are discredited and delegitimized by those who hold positions of authority. In this way, if in the future this crisis should come to an end, restoring trust in the Church and restoring her authority will be almost impossible, humanly speaking.

CFN: In a recent interview (here), you said that certain Cardinals “created by Benedict XVI have proved to be completely inferior to the expectations of faithful conservatives,” and that some of them “at the last Conclave witnessed things that they do not denounce publicly.” What things do you believe they witnessed and why do they not denounce them?

Some cardinals who entered the Conclave in 2013 do not seem to understand the gravity of what happened in the Conclave and continues to happen, under false appearances of formal legality. We have heard them fiercely defend the Papacy, declaring that the errors proposed by Bergoglio and his impromptu provocations are not to be considered papal Magisterium; we heard them ask Bergoglio to resolve the Dubia without him even deigning to answer, and everything ended there. But this denunciation of the effects — that is, the present “pontificate” — is completely useless as long as it refuses to recognize their causes in the conciliar revolution, sidelining this question. Their tetragonal desire to “save” the pseudo-magisterium of Vatican II, which is the remote cause of the present crisis, renders utterly useless any action in defense of the Church.

As for their silence on the events that took place during the Conclave, I see here as well a certain formally legalistic mentality prevailing over the urgent need to put an end to the subversive coup d’état of the deep church. Their main concern is to not undermine the observance of norms that are valid in times of relative normality, so that it cannot be said that they have violated human precepts, while with their respect for procedures they find themselves endorsing the violation of divine precepts carried out by none other than the leaders of the Catholic hierarchy.

I find it incomprehensible that a member of the College of Cardinals can confide to friends that he has witnessed facts that render the election of Jorge Mario null and void, and at the same time he does not want to denounce them publicly so as not to break the Pontifical secret: the secret that he has already broken by talking about it with those who can do nothing, which forces His Eminence into silence before the Church, whose Pastors could perhaps settle the question. But here we are not talking about the Seal of Confession, but rather about matters that have reason to be reserved until this is to the detriment of the institution that brought them into force; otherwise we find ourselves like the Pharisees of the Gospel, who asked Our Lord if it was lawful to pull a donkey out of the well on the Sabbath day.

The indiscretions of these Cardinals focus on the evidence of serious irregularities, without providing further details. I am reminded of what happened in 1958, with the question of the smoke that was initially white and then turned black: it seems that Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was elected, but then, due to the opposition of the Soviet communist regime, the Fathers were forced to elect another man as Pope, who coincidentally turned out to be the conciliatory Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli.

If these confidences are true, I dare not think of the moral travail of those who are preparing to take the secret to the grave, when they would have had the opportunity of unmasking the intrigues and plots of the Saint Gallen Mafia. If they are not true, it would not make sense to talk about it even with the most trusted people (who, however, must have told others, since the news has leaked).

CFN: Humanly speaking, do you foresee any way the next conclave will not repeat the outcome of 2013?

Except for extraordinary interventions by Providence, the College of Cardinals has been largely entirely discredited by Bergoglio: Caligula limited himself to the threat of appointing his horse Incitatus as priest and consul; the present crisis instead creates Cardinals who under Pius IX would have been sent in partibus infidelium. The outcome of the next Conclave therefore seems obvious, rebus sic stantibus. But if evidence were to emerge of some serious irregularity in the 2013 Conclave, this would ipso facto render the outcome of its election null and void, and consequently all the acts of government and magisterium carried out by the one elected. Included among these null and void acts would be, of course, the creation of Cardinals, so that all the Consistories of Bergoglio would be null: we would find ourselves as if by magic back in the situation of 2013, and this would disrupt Bergoglio’s plans, because if the electors of the next Conclave were only those cardinals appointed prior to 2013, they would certainly be less inclined to repeat the mistakes already committed and, strengthened by the experience of the past ten years, they could elect the least bad candidate among them.

CFN: Next year, Americans will face another presidential election. In 2020, you were greatly supportive of Donald Trump’s efforts to obtain a second term. In light of his continued promotion of COVID vaccines and his rhetoric in favor of the LGBTQ agenda, do you believe that Catholics can still support him in another bid for the presidency? Do you still consider him to be a “katechon” of sorts?

The President of the United States of America can be a sort of katechon if he is clear about the global coup d’état perpetrated by the deep state. I believe that Donald Trump has understood the deception he has been subjected to by Antony Fauci and the other Big Pharma peddlers, and that he is also capable — as is Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on the Democrat side — to verify whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus is part of a military project which has used pharmaceutical companies only for the large-scale production of serums (which significantly began even in 2019, before the declaration of the pandemic emergency).

With regard to other forms of more or less explicit support for movements or ideologies contrary to the Catholic Faith, I would like to suggest to the President not to be influenced by the reports and percentages of the electoral communication agencies, and to think about the responsibility before God for the decisions that, as President of the United States, he takes on. The task of the President of the United States is to govern his people for the common good, according to justice and with respect for the natural and divine Law. If he fulfills this task, the Lord — Who is Almighty and Who decides the fate of nations and individuals — will bless him and the American people; if, on the contrary, he fails in his duties and panders to the mentality of the world and the advice of his electoral experts, he can certainly not expect God, offended and disobeyed, to help him and the Nation.

It must be said that Trump, in his recent rallies, has strongly denounced woke policies and pledged to combat gender transition and mutilation for minors, gender indoctrinationin schools, the hyper-sexualization of children, and child trafficking. It is significant that, just when the people’s perception of the very serious threat of the pedophile lobby is increasing, the US Department of Justice has nothing better to do than reduce the level of social alarm: evidently the dome of perverts that maneuvers Biden feels public awareness breathing down their necks.

In any case, I prefer a thousand Trumps to one Biden, there is no doubt about that. Also, because Trump has shown himself in fact much closer to the image of a Catholic politician than the self-styled Catholic Biden has done.

CFN: Do you have any thoughts about Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and his campaign to win the Democratic Party’s nomination for President? Given his support of abortion, could a Catholic vote for Kennedy in good conscience?

Robert Kennedy certainly has a clear view on the pandemic and vaccine fraud and the deep state’s assault on Americans’ fundamental rights. The positive aspects of his political program do not take away the fact that he supports abortion, and this means one cannot vote for him, especially since Kennedy declares himself Catholic despite being in serious contradiction with the teaching of the Church as well as the natural law. Here too we need a jolt of pride, which puts aside electoral calculations and makes a radical choice. Compromise is no longer practicable today.

CFN: Arguably the most significant event since Joe Biden took office has been the outbreak of war between Russia and Ukraine, which seems to have been provoked at least in part by bad actors. What do you think the deep state is hoping to achieve through this ongoing conflict?

The Ukrainian crisis has been prepared for years, in order to destroy the Russian Federation through a process of balkanization, so as to guarantee a hegemony of the Anglosphere in the international geopolitical balance and keep the European nations in a position of subordination with respect to Anglo-American power.

The conflict was supposed to have resulted in Putin’s further rapprochement with Xi Jinping, which was largely predictable and could have been avoided. It is possible that pushing Russia into China’s arms could constitute, in the minds of the New World Order hierarchy, the casus belli for a declaration of war on China itself, which is consistent with the White House’s request to European partners to end the so-called Silk Road trade agreements. This claim will not only have serious repercussions for the reduction of exports to China and for the foreseeable increases in raw materials and semi-finished products from China that until now have been important; it also constitutes the premise for an instability and economic crisis that are usually the antechamber of a military conflict, to the benefit of arms sellers and those who profit from reconstruction (see Iraq, but also Greece). I doubt, however, that the elite has the time necessary to achieve these goals: its days are numbered, because the lie on which their power is based is now exposed.

Beyond the political strategies of one part of the American establishment, we know that the war in Ukraine has also served to hide the scandals of the Biden family and cover up the activity of biolaboratories financed by the Pentagon and America or its allies: artificial viruses genetically modified to be effective on certain ethnic groups have been discovered in those laboratories, in violation of international agreements. Probably the partial failure of the pandemic project — which in 2015 foresaw very large reductions in the world population — is due to the fact that Putin sped up the start of his military operation and put the scientists of those biolaboratories in prison.

Let’s not forget that Ukraine is the main player in the market of surrogacy, organ predation, and human trafficking, which also feeds the pedophile network. The denunciations of humanitarian organizations leave no doubt about these unprecedented horrors: children are being killed and dismembered to send their organs to clinics in the West; wounded Ukrainian soldiers are having their organs harvested for the same purpose; the lives of innocent creatures are being sold to rich perverts to satisfy their abominable deviations. And we know how much the deep stateis composed of characters who can be blackmailed precisely in furtherance of these execrable crimes, a dynamic highlighted by the recent film Sound of Freedom.

CFN: If peace in Ukraine were the true goal, what steps would need to be taken in order to obtain it?

Ukraine acts as a battering ram in NATO’s proxy war against the Russian Federation, so we should first stop considering Zelensky as a legitimate interlocutor in any peace agreements. If he has counted for nothing in the declaration of war and in the continuation of the military actions carried out so far, I do not see what his role should or could be at a peace negotiating table.

Certainly, the Ukrainian crisis can end immediately, if Kiev returns to being a buffer between the NATO bloc — which had previously pledged not to expand to the East — and guarantees the autonomy of Donbass and the independence of Donetsk and Lugansk. The problem is that the damage suffered and the colossal debt taken on by Ukraine in order to cope with the procurement of weapons and the sending of soldiers to the front makes it difficult to end the conflict, also because victory against Russia is impossible without the official involvement of other nations. As long as there was a plan to merely send old tanks or a few volunteers, NATO convinced its member countries to support the war, but I do not believe that they really want to start a world war, despite the ranting statements of some politicians.

CFN: In past statements and interviews, you have expressed notable support for Russia in the context of the war. While Ukraine clearly has the support of Western globalists, would you not agree that Russia’s strong alliance with Communist China is equally concerning, especially in light of Our Lady of Fatima’s prophecies concerning the “errors of Russia”?

My support is not for Russia per se, but for those who are actively opposing the plans of the New World Order at this juncture. It was well known that a conflict between the United States and the Russian Federation would inevitably strengthen the ties of the latter with China: it is only to be hoped that the alliance between Putin and Xi Jinping is not only to the advantage of the Chinese communist dictatorship, and that the balance will be maintained.

I believe, however, that the time has come to get out of the ideological cage that leads us to consider Americans “good” and Russians “bad,” on the basis of a prejudice wanted and imposed by the deep state. As Giulio Andreotti rightly observed — before being ousted from international politics by the intervention of the Atlantic services with the collaboration of organized crime and mafia informants — “NATO should have been dissolved in favor of a social purpose when the Berlin Wall fell in ‘89” (Repubblica, 28 October 2004). Until we realize that Western governments are hostage to an elite dome of subversives who manage power against the peoples, we will not be able to defeat this institutional cancer that alters the international balance and feeds on wars, famine, and poverty.

When Our Lady speaks of the “errors of Russia,” we should consider that these errors have now spread throughout the West, while in Russia materialist atheism and communism have now become a minority. It is in the West — and even within the Catholic Church — that Marxist errors are today publicly professed by governments, in an infernal union between socialism and liberalism that is an expression of the two great Masonic currents, the socialist and revolutionary currents of French Freemasonry and the liberal and institutional currents of Anglo-American Freemasonry.

CFN: One of the hidden plagues in our world today is child trafficking. The new film Sound of Freedom starring Jim Caviezel, the actor who portrayed Our Lord in Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, shines a light on this plague and calls upon all people to help eradicate it. Meanwhile, Joe Biden’s Department of Justice appears to be downplaying the problem (here). Do you believe, as Caviezel does, that there is a connection between global elites, government agencies, and child trafficking?

As I said earlier, Ukraine is at the center of child trafficking and pedophilia, which principally involves the members of the Satanic elite of the New World Order and government agencies of many states. I am not surprised that this elite seeks in every way to minimize or hide these heinous crimes, also resorting to the power it possesses throughout politics, the media, and the world of entertainment. If we think about how Joe Biden’s son, who has been photographed in poses with minors that are as obscene as they are eloquent, is still at large, we ought to ask ourselves what forces are in play and how deep is the corruption of our leaders and the entire ruling class that revolves around them.

Caviezel’s denunciation has the merit of bringing to light this network of complicity and crimes which cry out for vengeance before God, and which cannot go unpunished. I think also that the now-imminent collapse of the entire deep state will be due more to the indignation of common citizens over the horrors it has perpetrated against children than to the evidence of their plan to exterminate humanity by means of pandemics and famines.

When I hear Klaus Schwab declare: “Climate lockdowns are coming: no more debate necessary,” I wonder how much of a hurry these subversives — Schwab, Gates, Soros, etc. — are in to bring their infernal project to completion in order to hide the reality of what they are doing. Their plans for total control ultimately aim to guarantee themselves impunity by manipulating the Truth and imposing a lie.

CFN: In light of the increasing suppression of the True Mass by the hierarchy, what advice would you give to Catholics who are concerned about attending Mass by, or receiving sacraments from, a priest lacking written faculties or in an “irregular canonical status”?

During the 1970s, when Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre distanced himself from the “conciliar church” and continued to ordain priests who would guarantee the celebration of the Catholic Mass, the first measures taken against the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X were of a canonical nature: suspension a divinis for having conferred Holy Orders in an institute that had become irregular from one day to the next. The same thing that Archbishop Lefebvre had done up until the day before with the encouragement of the Pope had become illicit overnight. It was only fifteen years later, in 1988, with the Consecration of bishops that excommunication was imposed on Lefebvre, which was then revoked by Benedict XVI. Archbishop Lefebvre had the strength to bear witness to his fidelity to Christ even by disobeying the orders of the Hierarchy, and it is thanks to this holy disobedience that the clergy and the faithful have been able to benefit first from the Motu Proprio Ecclesia Dei and then from Summorum Pontificum.

In fact, I would say more: many of those people who today indulge in giving little lessons about orthodoxy to others, seeking to demonstrate the acceptability of Vatican II, and who attend liturgical celebrations in the Ancient Rite with the tacit agreement that they will not reject the Council — these individuals can do so only thanks to the “intransigence,” that is, to the principled steadfastness, of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who denounced the errors of that most unfortunate assembly and the liturgical reform that followed it. Without his courage; without the testimony of priests who continued to celebrate the Mass of all Ages and who were torn away from the altars only because they were ordered by their Bishops, the traditional rite would have definitively disappeared from our churches, as it did for nearly the first twenty years following the Council.

And so I ask myself: is it possible that the authority of the Church can be used to prevent the very same thing that the authority of the Church blessed and praised prior to the Council? Can the vicarious power of the Pope and Bishops go against the purpose for which Our Lord, the holder of that power, has established the Church? And again: what credibility can the authority of the Shepherds have when it first establishes a universal norm, then prohibits it, then restores it, and then finally de facto suppresses the same rite? It is necessary to recognize that the exercise of ecclesiastical authority is indissolubly tied to the purpose for which Christ has instituted the Sacred Hierarchy, and that no subversive power can usurp this authority without placing itself in opposition to the Church and to Christ Himself. The abolition of the Apostolic Mass by Paul VI in order to replace it with a counterfeit written by heretics was an abuse, and the nullification of Summorum Pontificum by Bergoglio was also an abuse. It is no coincidence that they are both part of a “conciliar church” broken off from the Catholic Church; a self-referential “church” that has separated from Sacred Tradition, with its own “saints,” its own rites, its own doctrine and morality, all in stark contrast to the Saints, Rites, Doctrine and Morality of the Church of Christ.

Anyone who impedes the celebration of the Tridentine Mass does so indefectibly for evil reasons. But in the entire history of the Church no one has ever dared to forbid the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice in a particular form by using the rationale that it does not express a “new ecclesiology.” Because if anyone had ever said this, he would have by those very words been implicitly recognizing that there is a new doctrinal formulation in contrast with that of the Mass of all Ages, something that, for a Catholic, is completely unacceptable and inconceivable.

If, therefore, the Mass of Saint Pius V is heterogeneous with respect to the religion imposed by the “conciliar church,” then it is the “conciliar church” that is placing itself outside the Church, and not those who, changing nothing of what has always been celebrated and believed, wish to defend a rite that has molded and still molds the holiness of the faithful and of priests.

I have personally founded the Exsurge Domine Association (here the link where you can make your donation) in order to help priests and men and women religious who are being persecuted by the Bergoglian junta. We are constructing a monastic village in the Viterbo province in Italy, in order to give a home to the nuns of Pienza who have been persecuted by the Holy See and their Bishop. We are helping priests left without a parish simply because they celebrate the Apostolic Mass, priests who have been removed from ministry solely because they do not accept the present apostasy. I appeal to all Catholics, asking them to contribute to this project.

The failures of the deep church, like those of the deep state, can be hidden and denied, but they are apparent in all of their disastrous consequences. In order to remove the deep church from the ecclesial body — just like amputating an infected limb — it is necessary above all to denounce the false shepherds, firmly resist their illegitimate orders, and coordinate pastoral care for the small communities of those who are “refractory”. This will probably not assure the victory, but our commitment, our sincere desire to serve the Lord and save souls, our testimony of the coherence of our Christian lives, will be able to induce the Lord to that “everything” which only our “nothingness” can move.

And this is, after all, what gives a reason for hope in these circumstances: not the (Orthodox) fatalism of those who await a divine intervention without lifting a finger; not the (Protestant) activism which leaves God’s help out of the picture and places all its hope in itself; but rather the sane (Catholic and Roman) pragmatism which combines the omnipotence of God in deciding the fate of the world with the generous cooperation of man whom He has created and redeemed. In a word, it is the multiplication of the few loaves and fishes.

August 10, 2023
S. Laurentii Martyris
LiveJohn
@Father Jonn Miller Papal Secrets do not apply to opinions expressed about an invalidly elected candidate. Witness to the truth is therefore fully justified and without penalty.
Liam Ronan
@Father Jonn Miller Here (below) is the link to the interview and the direct quotes of the Archbishop attributed therein. I imagine the Archbishop would have corrected publicly any misquotations were there any such.
CFN INTERVIEWS VIGANÒ: Francis, Trump, Ukraine, Child Trafficking, and More - Catholic Family News