Ultraviolet
Facebook and Youtube would ban you for following me around all night "liking" every post I made with a red hate frownie. @San Atanasio Gesu started it and you just went crazy. Something I hope Don Reto Nay and GTV's moderators consider.

"This cyberbully is not even allowed on a secular page like Facebook or YouTube..." Would you like GTV to have Facebook and Youtube's harassment policies …More
Facebook and Youtube would ban you for following me around all night "liking" every post I made with a red hate frownie. @San Atanasio Gesu started it and you just went crazy. Something I hope Don Reto Nay and GTV's moderators consider.

"This cyberbully is not even allowed on a secular page like Facebook or YouTube..." Would you like GTV to have Facebook and Youtube's harassment policies in place right now? You'd be saying "adios" to GTV for good. I'm not complaining about your behavior, just exposing it for what it is.

You're good at being a cry-baby talking about "harassment" and "cyberbullying" but actions speak louder than words. You forgot that. Hopefully Don Reto and GTV's moderators haven't forgotten.

"We Hispanics are being harassed by this user." Liar. You Hispanics as you call yourselves, you and Gesu, love harassing me and, like clever bullies, pretend to be the victims while you do it.
This is what harassment looks like:
Ultraviolet
"Because we Hispanics are being harassed by this user @Ultraviolet who constantly insults us."-San Atanasio ora pro nobis Notice "we Hispanics" didn't remind you how they constantly gang up, harass and insult that same user who ends up taking on all three of them alone. @Don Reto Nay
Ultraviolet
"This cyberbully is not even allowed on a secular page like Facebook or YouTube" -San Atanasio ora pro nobis First, you and Gesu and all the other Latin GTV "regulars" relentlessly attack and criticize me. I don't complain. I just give what I get. I give it back the way I get it. Just a little harder and a bit more cleverly.

What you really hate is the way I disprove your lies about Scriptu…More
"This cyberbully is not even allowed on a secular page like Facebook or YouTube" -San Atanasio ora pro nobis First, you and Gesu and all the other Latin GTV "regulars" relentlessly attack and criticize me. I don't complain. I just give what I get. I give it back the way I get it. Just a little harder and a bit more cleverly.

What you really hate is the way I disprove your lies about Scripture, about the Pope, about anything that falls out of your stupid mouth, regardless of what language you use or the one you hide behind. Nice to see you're back in English now that you're done with St. Thomas, eh?

Thanks for all the red frownies, companeros. Just one problem... Ay! This isn't Reddit. A little Latin clique of "amgos" can't "down-vote" the truth the way you'd like to. It's going to stay right here where it belongs.
Ultraviolet
You're not quoting St. Thomas Aquinas @San Atanobody . You Latin GTV users do that a little too often. I caught @DEFENSA doing that just a day or so ago on this post.

Let's check St. Thomas Aquinas' own teachings on sodomy in. Summa Theologiae, Second Part of the Second Part, Question 154

The saint did NOT teach "sodomites are idolators". The saint taught no such thing.

This site quot…More
You're not quoting St. Thomas Aquinas @San Atanobody . You Latin GTV users do that a little too often. I caught @DEFENSA doing that just a day or so ago on this post.

Let's check St. Thomas Aquinas' own teachings on sodomy in. Summa Theologiae, Second Part of the Second Part, Question 154

The saint did NOT teach "sodomites are idolators". The saint taught no such thing.

This site quotes the Saint in detail on the subject, analyzing his teachings. Again. The saint did NOT teach "sodomites are idolators"

Additional teachings from the saint here . The saint did NOT claim or teach "sodomites are idolators"

Fourth site, the author even translates Aquinas directly. The saint did NOT claim or teach "sodomites are idolators"

So I've got FOUR sites quoting St. Thomas Aquinas and he taught no such thing.

All you have is your menudo-mouth.
DEFENSA DE LA FE
But Saint Paul said it clearly read Him.
Ultraviolet
" But Saint Paul said... " Your amigo made a claim about St. Thomas Aquinas @DEFENSA DE LA FE . Please DO keep up with the discussion. and... you're not quoting St. Paul, either! What is it with GTV's Latin "regulars" and your inability to factually support your claims, anyway?
San Atanasio ora pro nobis
The ignorant are also arrogant.
Ultraviolet
Self criticism becomes you @San Ata-no-facts :D
San Atanasio ora pro nobis
Santo Tomás de Aquino comenta Romanos 1:

«(Rm 6,23): El salario del pecado es la muerte. Todos sus dones serán quemados al fuego (Miq 1,7). Y es de notarse que muy razonablemente les asigna el Apóstol a los vicios contra natura, que son gravísimos entre los pecados carnales, la pena de la idolatría (...)
Ultraviolet
Hiding behind Spanish doesn't work with me, angelito.. If you can "habla englais" when trying to get me in trouble with @Don Reto Nay and GTV's mods, you can go right on doing so here. IN ENGLISH "And it should be noted that very reasonably the Apostle assigns them to vices against nature, which are very serious among carnal sins, the penalty of idolatry."

First, where are you getting this…More
Hiding behind Spanish doesn't work with me, angelito.. If you can "habla englais" when trying to get me in trouble with @Don Reto Nay and GTV's mods, you can go right on doing so here. IN ENGLISH "And it should be noted that very reasonably the Apostle assigns them to vices against nature, which are very serious among carnal sins, the penalty of idolatry."

First, where are you getting this quote? Or are you making it up? Second, you obviously don't understand it even in "Espanol"....Your own quote states that St. Thomas states "the Apostle (Paul) assigns them "vices against nature".

Now compare what I originally said to Gesu. I said: "Sodomy is a sin of the flesh. Idolatry is of the spirit. The two sins are different."

Interesting how GTV's Latin Community all becomes one voice, eh? Gesu makes the claim but San Atanasio defends it. "We Hispanics" indeed!

...and how does St. Thomas quoting St. Paul refer to those sins? "which are very serious among carnal sins,"

Carnal . "directly from Latin carnalis "fleshly, of the flesh," from carnis "of the flesh,"

So St. Thomas, quoting Paul supports my claim using literally the same Latin term for it

St Thomas said they are carnal sins (of the flesh) and I said they are sins of the flesh

This is your big proof? All you've shown is your typical ignorance and inability to reason.

If carnal sins carry the "penalty of idolatry", what of it? That does not show carnal sins ARE idolatry, only they carry the same penalty.

Murder carries a penalty of life inprisonment.
Large scale drug-distribution also carries a penalty of life imprisonment.

But large-scale drug distribution is not murder and sodomy is not idolatry.

Anything else before you park your lazy, uneducated rear on a sofa bought by Calfornia's tax-payers, crack open una cerveza and flip on Univision tonight? :D
Ultraviolet
"How is it that on this Catholic page this arrogant ignorant @Ultraviolet is allowed to insult Catholics?" -San Atanobody

A valid question. I think I can explain. First. you are not a Catholic, you're an anti-Papal schismatic and Canon Law 1364, sect.1 says the Catholic Church wants no part of you.

Second, yes, I am arrogant. I deal in facts and cite Catholic sources extensively. I'm on …More
"How is it that on this Catholic page this arrogant ignorant @Ultraviolet is allowed to insult Catholics?" -San Atanobody

A valid question. I think I can explain. First. you are not a Catholic, you're an anti-Papal schismatic and Canon Law 1364, sect.1 says the Catholic Church wants no part of you.

Second, yes, I am arrogant. I deal in facts and cite Catholic sources extensively. I'm on the right side of the Church's laws and teachings. That's why I'm the one always linking them. I suspect much of the tolerance GTV's admins have for me is based on this.

There hasn't ever been a debate on Catholic law or Catholic theology I've ever lost on GTV. Not one, even against people who are demonstrably better educated than I am.. When it comes to particulars, I'm more Catholic than any of my critics. You just make noise like the rest of GTV's Chalupa-Chompers. :P

I believe I'm allowed to insult you because people like you insult me. GTV's admin recognizes what you choose to ignore. Questioning my faith is a cruel thing, especially in light of my obvious and extensive knowledge of it. I know more about the Church's laws and teachings than you and gesu and defensa put together. That's why you always lose these debates.

So cruelty and insults are acceptable when YOU do it. I just don't whine about it the way you do. I grit my teeth, take it, and "do unto others".

You and your compañeros insult me so casually, so constantly you don't even register it as "insulting". It's just you voicing your vicious Latin-temperment without a second thought.

Fair enough, just remember one thing. You get what you give, Burrito-Breath. :D
San Atanasio ora pro nobis
Saint Thomas Aquinas taught that Sodomites are idolaters.

How is it that on this Catholic page this arrogant ignorant @Ultraviolet is allowed to insult Catholics?
San Atanasio ora pro nobis
For WICKED cannot sleep unless they have done EVIL;
they are robbed of sleep unless they have made someone stumble. (Cf. Proverbs 4:16)
Ultraviolet
Sodomy is a sin of the flesh. Idolatry is of the spirit. The two sins are different, @Gesù è con noi Haven't you been stupid enough for ONE post, already?

"Here we see that the Sodomites have replaced God with Bergoglio."

Here we see you breaking wind as usual. These people are using The Pope to justify their own warped interpretation of Gods' teachings. You should talk, eh?.

You have replac…More
Sodomy is a sin of the flesh. Idolatry is of the spirit. The two sins are different, @Gesù è con noi Haven't you been stupid enough for ONE post, already?

"Here we see that the Sodomites have replaced God with Bergoglio."

Here we see you breaking wind as usual. These people are using The Pope to justify their own warped interpretation of Gods' teachings. You should talk, eh?.

You have replaced God with pro-Sodomite Joe Biden and your CalFresh EBT card.

You're voting for the pro-Sodomite Biden to get more free-money (from REAL Americans) on your card every month and Biden will turn California into one big barrio for your "community".

Save your pious preaching for the clerks at your local bodega.
Alex A
With 61 more comments to read, I'll soon be running out of pop-corn.
San Atanasio ora pro nobis
I don't think it's fun to see this new Roman coliseum crucify Catholics.
Alex A
@San Atanasio ora pro nobis > Who's doing the crucifying? I haven't got to that part yet.
Gesù è con noi
Sodomites are idolaters. Scripture curses those who trust man to turn away from God. Here we see that the Sodomites have replaced God with Bergoglio. Instead of joining Bergoglio to repent of their vice, they join Bergoglio to insist on their rebellion against God.
Ultraviolet
"Whoever obeys a heretic or prays with or for a heretic is a heretic said pope Saint Agatho." @DEFENSA DE LA FE Wrong. This is how GTV's Latin community re-writes Catholic saints into taco-eating bigots like themselves. The saint wrote: "If anyone prays with heretics, he is a heretic." --Pope St. Agatho I (678-682), SCN XXI:635.

Notice St. Agatho did NOT say "praying for" heretics makes a …More
"Whoever obeys a heretic or prays with or for a heretic is a heretic said pope Saint Agatho." @DEFENSA DE LA FE Wrong. This is how GTV's Latin community re-writes Catholic saints into taco-eating bigots like themselves. The saint wrote: "If anyone prays with heretics, he is a heretic." --Pope St. Agatho I (678-682), SCN XXI:635.

Notice St. Agatho did NOT say "praying for" heretics makes a person a heretic. Of course we should pray for those who retain such errors. The Blessed Mother's plea at Fatima that we pray for the consecration of Russia is built on this.

That's right, @DEFENSA DE LA FE . The Blessed Mother herself contradicts you. She isn't the only one. So do early Christian theologians like Irenaeus of Lyons who spent much of his life countering the Gnostic heresy and wrote prayers asking God for their deliverance.

Then there's St. Ignatius. He "exhorted Christians to continue to pray for others, and especially for those who became Docetists or held other heretical beliefs"

So, no, I'm not a heretic. You and the rest of GTV's daily "Latin American Amigos" are just as stupid as our Latin American Pope. You don't know your Chuch History any more than you know Church Law and then you lie like the dogs you are to fill in the difference.
DEFENSA DE LA FE
Thank you for the correction Saint Agatho I, sorry i missed I.
Ultraviolet
I -was- going to type "You are welcome" but the title of this post stopped me. ;-) Not a problem. I -do- appreciate you acknowledging the correction.
Ultraviolet
Let's see how many times I have to explain the difference between "submission" and "obedience" to GTV's Latin community. "One may submit to the Supreme Pontiff, nowhere does Canon Law state one must agree with the Supreme Pontiff or follow the Supreme Pontiff when he errs, especially when his errors might well lead him to Hell."

I see people like @DEFENSA DE LA ENGANO and Gesu and Verdad…More
Let's see how many times I have to explain the difference between "submission" and "obedience" to GTV's Latin community. "One may submit to the Supreme Pontiff, nowhere does Canon Law state one must agree with the Supreme Pontiff or follow the Supreme Pontiff when he errs, especially when his errors might well lead him to Hell."

I see people like @DEFENSA DE LA ENGANO and Gesu and Verdad and San Ata-nobody and it's just astounding how you people all can share the same fundamental stupidity. It has to be something you're taught culturally. Non-reason as a community value los ninos swallow every morning with their huevos rancheros. :D
4 more comments from Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet
Can you two great Catholic scholars list the truths taught by the Church to be divine? I just saw your "Open New Tab/ Window" menu fly up, si? :D

You don't know. I know you don't. Defintiely not well enough to accuse the Pope or anyone else of heresy in any form, "formal" or otherwise.

Almost forgot, now that you've repeatedly insulted my Catholic faith, make sure you cry about how …More
Can you two great Catholic scholars list the truths taught by the Church to be divine? I just saw your "Open New Tab/ Window" menu fly up, si? :D

You don't know. I know you don't. Defintiely not well enough to accuse the Pope or anyone else of heresy in any form, "formal" or otherwise.

Almost forgot, now that you've repeatedly insulted my Catholic faith, make sure you cry about how YOU get bullied.. Watching you lose a debate isn't complete without that. . . :P
Ultraviolet
You already did the first/ second "heretic" admonition Titus 3:11-11, Gestupido. One mo' time! Heresy and error are two different things. A Pope may err, everything a Pope states is not automatically infallible. Heresy, as the Church defines it in Canon Law 751, is "an obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Cathol…More
You already did the first/ second "heretic" admonition Titus 3:11-11, Gestupido. One mo' time! Heresy and error are two different things. A Pope may err, everything a Pope states is not automatically infallible. Heresy, as the Church defines it in Canon Law 751, is "an obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith; "

Obstinacy shows a deliberate course of action, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."

In this context, the term shows that
a.) the accused heretic has expressed a view
b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
c.) The Church has attempted to correct the accused heretic
d.) the accused heretic has opposed that correction by the Church.

Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) has happened.
b.)-d.) have not.

You aren't qualified to represent The Church in doing b.-d., not in law or in fact. Neither is your buddy "La Verdad".

Your opinion that the Pope doubts or denies a truth taught by the Church to be divine is not an objective fact. Likewise, your opinion that his supposed doubt or denial is maintained in an obstinate manner is also an opinion. You haven't shown The Church has attempted to correct it and failed. So your claim has no support.

A more relevant question in light of a charge of heresy is this: who has the temporal authority to represent the Church when attempting to correct the supposed errors of the Church's highest temporal authority?
Ultraviolet
You said he was an apostate earlier, Gestupido He can't be an apostate AND a heretic. A heretic believes but believes wrongly. An apostate does not believe at all. You're contradicting yourself. More Gesu-talk without any understanding.

Protip: I didn't impose zip. Go thank the College of Cardinals for that one. You don't know how the Church works, any more than how the Laws of the Church …More
You said he was an apostate earlier, Gestupido He can't be an apostate AND a heretic. A heretic believes but believes wrongly. An apostate does not believe at all. You're contradicting yourself. More Gesu-talk without any understanding.

Protip: I didn't impose zip. Go thank the College of Cardinals for that one. You don't know how the Church works, any more than how the Laws of the Church work.
Ultraviolet
Oh, I do care. @la mentira prevalece . I care enough to keep the stupid Latin burros from braying up GTV with your lies.

"that overlooks in his idol Bergoglio -old and current." @Ultraviolet suffers from Bergoglio idolatry.

Disproven over a year ago. 16 April 2019. Aww... still behind the times, angelitos? :D

"I do not support Pope Francis. I don't like Pope Francis. I don't approve of …
More
Oh, I do care. @la mentira prevalece . I care enough to keep the stupid Latin burros from braying up GTV with your lies.

"that overlooks in his idol Bergoglio -old and current." @Ultraviolet suffers from Bergoglio idolatry.

Disproven over a year ago. 16 April 2019. Aww... still behind the times, angelitos? :D

"I do not support Pope Francis. I don't like Pope Francis. I don't approve of Pope Francis. But Pope Francis is the Pope. I don't like that either. I have repeatedly explained this to KristianKeller. I've repeatedly explained this to many people here.


It's so cute to watch you and Gestupido huddle like your family does when the INS van drives through your neighborhood. Ay Carramba Thees ees why we say prayer for Senor Biden. to ween!:D

Santo Biden is EBT and SNAP money you can spend. "Hayzoos" just a lot of feel-good noise and nothing else for either of you.

That's why you can lie about me, lie about the Pope, lie about the Catechism, lie about Canon Law, lie about whatever you bloody well please because nobody ever taught you telling a lie is wrong. Not your parish priest, not those sorry excuses you call you parents, not the roly-poly clowns you call your relatives, nobody in your entire stupid "community". Stealing? Okay if we do eet to los greengos. Lies? Same teeng y' no problemo.

....and then you condemn Francis for being a false Catholic. Your "Church" is the welfare office and your "God" whoever signs the check.
Gesù è con noi
Note the sick obsession of the Bergoglians @Ultraviolet to impose on their heretic when the same heretic prohibits proselytizing Christ.
Gesù è con noi
Nótese la enfermiza obsesión de los Bergoglianos para imponer a su hereje cuando el mismo hereje prohíbe proselitizar a Cristo.
Gesù è con noi
>>Let them alone: they are blind, and leaders of the blind.>>
Saint Jerome: This is also the same as that Apostolic injunction, “A heretic after the first and second admonition reject, knowing that such a one is perverse.” [Tit 3:11-11] To the same end the Saviour commands evil teachers to be left to their own will, knowing that it is hardly that they can be brought to the truth. Catena Aurea
Ultraviolet
"Canon 188 states: ." @la verdad prevalece

...and none of those apply here since Benedict himself contradicts you.

"The only condition for the validity of my resignation is the complete freedom of my decision. Speculations regarding its validity are simply absurd."

"and apart from that, Pope Benedict never resigned from the Petrinus munus," @Gesutpido

...that isn't even a requirement unde…More
"Canon 188 states: ." @la verdad prevalece

...and none of those apply here since Benedict himself contradicts you.

"The only condition for the validity of my resignation is the complete freedom of my decision. Speculations regarding its validity are simply absurd."

"and apart from that, Pope Benedict never resigned from the Petrinus munus," @Gesutpido

...that isn't even a requirement under Canon Law, Gestupido. Again, you're making up Canon Law the way you make up the Catechism. You're both so dumb it's a pure joy.

Canon Law 332.2 requires only two points for a valid Papal resignation.

§2. If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.

Freely and properly manifested. That's it. Benedict has said he did so freely and he's "properly manifested" it endlessly. Benedict himself contradicts you.

The word "munus" does not even appear.
la verdad prevalece
😂 As if @Ultraviolet cared about excommunication, apostasy or schism, and heresy that overlooks in his idol Bergoglio -old and current. 🤔
Gesù è con noi
@Ultraviolet suffers from Bergoglio idolatry.
DEFENSA DE LA FE
Whoever obeys a heretic or prays with or for a heretic is a heretic said pope Saint Agatho. Ultraviolet is a heretic you tried to convince him he didnot hear you.
Alex A
You, amigos, You sure are gluttons for punishment.
Ultraviolet
"Saint Thomas in his Summa Theologiae writes that heretics must be excommunicated." Notice Gesu doesn't quote St. Thomas, does he? ;-) There's a reason.

"Bergoglio must be deposed because he is a danger to the Faith."

Now you -are- officially advancing heresy.
"That would be the heresy of conciliarism as condemned at the Fifth Lateran Council, 1512–17". @Cuthbert Mayne

Nice one, Gesu. …More
"Saint Thomas in his Summa Theologiae writes that heretics must be excommunicated." Notice Gesu doesn't quote St. Thomas, does he? ;-) There's a reason.

"Bergoglio must be deposed because he is a danger to the Faith."

Now you -are- officially advancing heresy.
"That would be the heresy of conciliarism as condemned at the Fifth Lateran Council, 1512–17". @Cuthbert Mayne

Nice one, Gesu. So. You're a schismatic because you refuse to submit to the Supreme Pontiff. Heck, you won't even acknowledge he IS the Supreme Pontiff.

Now you're a heretic as well. And you're complaining about Pope Francis? Literally you're at two out of three here. All you need is some real winner and I can nail you on apostasy as well.

We'll get there. :D
la verdad prevalece
Canon 188 states: A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself.
Gesù è con noi
Wherever you look, Bergoglio is not pope:
He was invalid elected by the gay mafia of Saint Gallen,
He was already a heretic, apostate and schism in Argentina,
and apart from that, Pope Benedict never resigned from the Petrinus munus, therefore there was never an apostolic succession.
Gesù è con noi
Vittorio Messori, the most influential commentator on Vatican affairs published an article where he explained:
That is to say, it is discovered that Benedict XVI had no intention of renouncing the Petrinus munus, nor the office, or the duties, which Christ himself attributes to the head of the Apostles and which has been transmitted to his successors.
DEFENSA DE LA FE
Pooe Pious IX said if a future pope separates fron the faith donot follow him. And bergoglio is Not even a pope.
Ultraviolet
"this shows his obstinacy, his formal heresy, his apostasy and schism," @Gestupido ...and the pokey Spanish-burro repeats the same braying noise. Right after I corrected it literally an hour ago on this post. Dios Mio.

Obstinacy requires correction. Copy-Pasta? No. Now it's Copy-Tostadas for the stupid burro to eat...

Obstinacy shows a deliberate course of action, i.e. "stubbornly adhe…More
"this shows his obstinacy, his formal heresy, his apostasy and schism," @Gestupido ...and the pokey Spanish-burro repeats the same braying noise. Right after I corrected it literally an hour ago on this post. Dios Mio.

Obstinacy requires correction. Copy-Pasta? No. Now it's Copy-Tostadas for the stupid burro to eat...

Obstinacy shows a deliberate course of action, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."

In this context, the term shows that
a.) someone has expressed a view
b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
c.) The Church has attempted to correct the accused heretic
d.) someone has opposed that correction by the Church.

Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) has happened.
b.)-d.) have not. YOU are not the Church.

Who has the temporal authority to represent the Church when attempting to correct the supposed errors of the Church's highest temporal authority?

Not you, Gesu. You don't speak for the Church. You can't even quote the Church or Christ without lousing it all up.

Likewise, you don't know the difference between "formal heresy", "informal heresy", "heresy in fact" or "heresy as the Church defines it". It's just Gesu-Talk for "Ay Carrabma! Franseesco.. hee bad man. I call heem un hereje formal. He no Catolico any more when I say! ja-ja-ja-ja Soy tan listo, si?."

Apostasy is a total renunciation of the Christian Faith. A heretic, by definition does not renounce his faith, he errs in his beliefs of it.

Schism? He's the Pope. The Pope can't refuse to submit to his own authority.

Moar Copy-Tostadas para mi Amigos...

If he's a schismatic, then he is refusing to submit to the Supreme Pontiff. Then who is the pope, estupido? Not Benedict XVI. He resigned and acknowledges Francis. Even if there is NO pope at all, then Francis still is not a schismatic. There must be a Pope for a schismatic to refuse to submit TO.

"Apostate, Heretic, Schismatic" in Gesu-Talk means "A Catholic stops being Catholic because I called heem dees bad teengs"

It's all just "mira-mira-mira.. habla-habla-habla...disparates-disparates-disparates."

...and then people wonder why California is so royally doomed. Imagine an an entire culture of such stupidity, generation after generation, Stupid parents raising their stupid children. Generation after generation, barely able to read English, much less speak it, just sittting around shovelling mountains of Goya in their fat round faces jabbering mindlessly.

...and yeah, they're all voting for Biden. Welfare will always come before "Hayzoos" when it comes to the ballot box. Biden is free money right here and now, from los gringos... "Hayzoos" is just for GTV. and maybe en "el Domingo". Maybe.. :P
la verdad prevalece
No one makes fun of God, Bergoglio will pay for his betrayal. Luke 17: 2
DEFENSA DE LA FE
Yes but he is hurting many souls as well.
Gesù è con noi
Bergoglio must be deposed because he is a danger to the Faith. Saint Thomas in his Summa Theologiae writes that heretics must be excommunicated.
la verdad prevalece
⚠️Alerta hay un ciberbully detras del teclado. ↓
Ultraviolet
I may tease you in Spanish, Gesu. but my points are entirely in English because I want everyone here to see why you're wrong. You want to hide behind Spanish because you're ashamed. That is the why I quote the Gospel of Christ in English and you quote the Gospel of Gesu in Spanish. :P

That's nice, @la mentira prevalece Let's all cite Pope Francis for breaking "Godwin's Law". Then we can …More
I may tease you in Spanish, Gesu. but my points are entirely in English because I want everyone here to see why you're wrong. You want to hide behind Spanish because you're ashamed. That is the why I quote the Gospel of Christ in English and you quote the Gospel of Gesu in Spanish. :P

That's nice, @la mentira prevalece Let's all cite Pope Francis for breaking "Godwin's Law". Then we can agree he's stupid for breaking it and you just as much for pointing out an irrelevancy, Not to you're deliberately ignoring something... pic related. :D
la verdad prevalece
Gesù è con noi
It is public that Bergoglio already in Argentina had deviated from the Catholic faith, this shows his obstinacy, his formal heresy, his apostasy and schism.
Ultraviolet
Sodomy is one of the sins that cry out to heaven...". So? What part of this did you miss, Gesu? Matthew 12:30-32 "Therefore I say to you: Every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men..."

Thank you for proving my point, mongolo. .The truth does not hide behind Spanish on an English post. You Latins always hide behind your "Spanish Curtain" when you've lost. Like children, seem to think it'…More
Sodomy is one of the sins that cry out to heaven...". So? What part of this did you miss, Gesu? Matthew 12:30-32 "Therefore I say to you: Every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men..."

Thank you for proving my point, mongolo. .The truth does not hide behind Spanish on an English post. You Latins always hide behind your "Spanish Curtain" when you've lost. Like children, seem to think it's clever that you can "ja-ja-ja" when only you, me, and about three other regular readers will undertand it.

The Truth shares the truth so all can understand. It doesn't cover the facts over in a stream of "Espanol" On a English-speaking post, we speak English. Habla... Engles... Comprende? You hide because that's what all liars do. You hide from the truth.
Gesù è con noi
@Ultraviolet pobre el único camino que le queda es perseguir a los católicos porque tiene por papa a un apostata. Una prueba de que @Ultraviolet pertenece a la ANTI IGLESIA DEL ANTICRISTO.
Ultraviolet
Friendly suggestion, Gesu. Link supports for your citations the way I do. Try using English pages instead of hiding behind "Espanol" the way you Latins like doing. I can read your language, not everyone else here can. Besides, you couldn't quote a Taco Bell menu without fabricating things much less Saint Augustine.

Por ejemplo... That bold list starting with. "Sin Against the Holy Spirit:" More
Friendly suggestion, Gesu. Link supports for your citations the way I do. Try using English pages instead of hiding behind "Espanol" the way you Latins like doing. I can read your language, not everyone else here can. Besides, you couldn't quote a Taco Bell menu without fabricating things much less Saint Augustine.

Por ejemplo... That bold list starting with. "Sin Against the Holy Spirit:" isn't isn't from the Catechsim, is it? That's why you won't link the Vatican website LIKE I DID. Gotcha, mentrito
Gesù è con noi
Let us also not forget that sodomy is one of the sins that cry out to heaven.
Gesù è con noi
@Ultraviolet Se obstina en Negar el Magisterio de la Iglesia que decreto que un hereje no puede ser papa aunque todos los cardenales hubieran elegido al hereje.
Gesù è con noi
@Ultraviolet If you want to play this game lets me answer you in Spanish.
2 more comments from Gesù è con noi
Gesù è con noi
Usted tiene un papa que habla Español entonces lea los documentos en Español. Si no lo entiende busque ayuda en español o busque la traducción mercaba.org/…cum_ex_apostolatus_officio.htm
Gesù è con noi
El documento esta claro habla de que un hereje no es candidato para el papado y si fuera elegido un hereje esta elección es invalida y nula.
Ultraviolet
"The Magisterium of the Church decreed to Perpetuity that..."@Gesù è con noi "The Magisterium of The Church" according TO the Church is the Pope and bishops in communion with him.

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.

THAT is the "Magisterium Of …More
"The Magisterium of the Church decreed to Perpetuity that..."@Gesù è con noi "The Magisterium of The Church" according TO the Church is the Pope and bishops in communion with him.

100 The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.

THAT is the "Magisterium Of The Church", you ignorant peasant. Go learn what the Catholic Church teaches before you lecture anyone else here about "the" Magisterium. Next time, "ordinary" vs. "extraordinary" ;-)
.
...because Gesu doesn't understand THAT distinction either.
"Magisterium" in Gesu-Talk means "whatever I think The Church says and always said".
"Apostate, Heretic, Schismatic" in Gesu-Talk means "A Catholic stops being Catholic because I called him these things."

It's all just "mira-mira-mira.. habla-habla-habla...disparates-disparates-disparates." Welcome to California's "Univision" Catholic Church
Gesù è con noi
Do you use drugs because even your English cannot be understood?
Gesù è con noi
In Catena Aurea Saint Augustine, sermons 71.3
explains that heretics blaspheme against the Holy Spirit.
Gesù è con noi
Sin Against the Holy Spirit:
Denying a truth
recognized as such by the Magisterium of the Church
Obstinacy in sin
Final impenitence
Presumption of salvation, etc.


Matthew 12:31Therefore I tell you, people will be forgiven for every sin and blasphemy, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.
Ultraviolet
Christ and the Church define "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" completely differently.@Gesù è con noi You speak for neither Christ nor The Church.

Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" is defined by the Church in CCC 1864 as the refusal to accept Christ's forgiveness. THERE IS NO MENTION of "publicly defying God's Natural Law and the teachings of the Church."

Likewise, Christ contradicts you …More
Christ and the Church define "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" completely differently.@Gesù è con noi You speak for neither Christ nor The Church.

Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit" is defined by the Church in CCC 1864 as the refusal to accept Christ's forgiveness. THERE IS NO MENTION of "publicly defying God's Natural Law and the teachings of the Church."

Likewise, Christ contradicts you As we read in Matthew 12:30-32 "Therefore I say to you: Every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men..."

If Pope Francis expresses his support for a secular "civil union" that is 1.) almost certainly sinful but 2.) not blasphemy since he is not promoting this as a teaching of Christ's. Even if he were putting words in Christ's mouth (like the way YOU do) Christ Himself still claims this is still forgivable. "And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him,"

In short:

a.) You're a vindictive, malicious "Catholic", well in keeping with your vindictive malicious Latin culture, exemplified by our vindictive malicious Latin Pope.

b.) You're an ignorant, uninformed "Catholic", well in keepig with your ignorant, uninformed Latin culture that worships death itself as a "saint" and befouled All Souls Day into a pagan "Latin" festival.

c.) Christ directly contradicts your interpretation of the extent His willingness to forgive.

d.) The Catholic Church directly contradicts your interpretation of this form of blasphemy.

e.) Sop using "Catholic" terminology like "formal heretic" since you clearly don't know what it means.

A "formal Heretic" as opposed to an "Informal Heretic"? Can you compare and contrast the two? No more than you can explain who interprets the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. Likewise, a heretic can not be an apostate nor an apostate a schismatic, you fool.

You don't know anything about what these words mean according to the Catholic Church. For you, They're just "Catholic/ Relgious-Sounding Crticism" you throw like a monkey tossing his own dung.

"Bergoglio has formed a schismatic and heretical apostate..."

Just look at that mess! If he's a schismatic, then he is refusing to submit to the Supreme Pontiff. Who is the pope, estupido? Not Benedict XVI. He resigned and acknowledges Francis. Even if there is NO pope at all, then Francis still is not a schismatic. There must be a Pope for a schismatic to refuse to submit TO.

You don't speak for the Church because you don't understand the language of the Church. You just throw these "religious words" like you do marigold petals at that ugly Santa Muerte statue in your living room.

I've explained why Francis isn't a heretic enough times even YOU should be able to quote me from memory by now. Ditto apostasy.

"The apostate Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not interested in the salvation of souls. "

You don't know what the Pope's interests are, or his thoughts. You're not a psychic and he isn't an apostate.

Quote Francis where he renonces in totality, the Christian faith. He hasn't so he isn't an apostate.

What gets me no end is I'll correct your errors and literally the very next day you'll repeat them. This isn't ignorance on your part anymore. It's outright stubborn stupiditiy... you're a stupid little Latin burro puking up the same garbage on GTV no matter how many times somebody (me) cleans up after you.
Gesù è con noi
Bergoglio blasphemes against the Holy Spirit by publicly defying God's Natural Law and the teachings of the Church.
In 1986 The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith then led by Cardinal Ratzinger warned bishops to make sure they "clearly state that homosexual activity is immoral."
The instruction adds, "But we want to make it clear that deviation from the Church's teachings, or silence …More
Bergoglio blasphemes against the Holy Spirit by publicly defying God's Natural Law and the teachings of the Church.
In 1986 The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith then led by Cardinal Ratzinger warned bishops to make sure they "clearly state that homosexual activity is immoral."
The instruction adds, "But we want to make it clear that deviation from the Church's teachings, or silence about it, in an effort to provide pastoral care is neither caring nor pastoral."
Jesus Christ warned us that false shepherds would recognize them by the fruits.
The Homosexual activist couple that Bergoglio congratulates have turned one of their adopted children into a homosexual and are using them all as gay activists
Gesù è con noi
Saint Paul affirms that homosexuals are not saved but are condemned. The apostate Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not interested in the salvation of souls. Bergoglio is a master of deception. Bergoglio does not seek the conversion of the Sodomites but the conversion of the Church, he wants to change the Church to accept the Sodomites who rebel against God.
Gesù è con noi
Bergoglio instead of seeking the conversion of homosexuals confirms them in their rebellion against God and against their own nature. Bergoglio has formed a schismatic and heretical apostate sect that challenges Scripture, Tradition and the four marks of the Catholic Church.
Gesù è con noi
Already in Argentina Jorge was a formal heretic who had rejected various articles of faith.
Here clearly what we see is his obstinacy in heresy. In fact Leonardo Boff just a week after Bergoglio's usurpation publicly revealed that Bergoglio had allowed a gay couple to adopt children:
A couple of months ago, for example, he expressly approved that a homosexual couple adopt a child.
Gesù è con noi
The Magisterium of the Church decreed to Perpetuity that the elevation to the papacy or to the bishopric of a heretic, that is, of anyone, would have deviated from the Catholic Faith, or would have fallen into heresy. or incurred in schism, this elevation is invalid and void.
Those who accept Bergoglio as pope have placed a heretic above the Magisterium of the Church.
Gesù è con noi
6. Nullity of all promotions or elevations of deviants in the Faith.

We add that if at some time it happened that a Bishop, even as Archbishop, or Patriarch, or Primate; or a Cardinal, even in function of Legate, or elected Roman Pontiff who before his promotion to the Cardinal or assumption of the Pontificate, had deviated from the Catholic Faith, or had fallen into heresy. or incurred in …More
6. Nullity of all promotions or elevations of deviants in the Faith.

We add that if at some time it happened that a Bishop, even as Archbishop, or Patriarch, or Primate; or a Cardinal, even in function of Legate, or elected Roman Pontiff who before his promotion to the Cardinal or assumption of the Pontificate, had deviated from the Catholic Faith, or had fallen into heresy. or incurred in schism, or had caused or committed it, his promotion or assumption, even if it had occurred with the unanimous agreement of all the Cardinals, is null, invalid and without any effect; and in no way can such assumption be considered to have acquired validity, by acceptance of the office and by its consecration, or by the subsequent possession or quasi possession of government and administration, or by the same enthronement or adoration of the Roman Pontiff, or by obedience that all have lent him, whatever the time elapsed after the aforementioned assumptions. Such assumption will not be considered legitimate in any of its parts, and it will not be possible to consider that any power to administer in temporal or spiritual things has been granted or is granted to those who are promoted, in such circumstances, to the dignity of bishop. , archbishop, patriarch or primate, or those who have assumed the function of Cardinals, or Roman Pontiff, but on the contrary each and every one of the pronouncements, facts, acts and resolutions and their consequent effects lack force, and not they grant no validity, and no rights to anyone.
Caroline03
Take a look at this.... Proof that if we put our life in the hands of Christ & pray - He is able to stop us dying if it is His Will.

aleteia.org/…priest-from-a-jihadists-knife/
Caroline03
I'm sure that the first thing that Jorge Bergoglio does every morning is to look in the mirror and say "Now what can I do today to attract new members to MY gay friendly church?"

The trouble is - in making HIMSELF more "acceptable" & promising whopping sinner's in Christ's Name that they'll gain eternal Heaven - He does the very opposite of what Christ instructs all to do!
His "God loves you …More
I'm sure that the first thing that Jorge Bergoglio does every morning is to look in the mirror and say "Now what can I do today to attract new members to MY gay friendly church?"

The trouble is - in making HIMSELF more "acceptable" & promising whopping sinner's in Christ's Name that they'll gain eternal Heaven - He does the very opposite of what Christ instructs all to do!
His "God loves you the way you are" waffle is a wickedness straight from the pits of Hell, & our approach, (the one of Christ) leads to us being rebuked on social media when we try to adhere to what the Bible preaches. How ONE dubious self-proclaimed "Pope" can gag Christ for so long without being struck down by massive bolts of lightning is a mystery.

If ONLY he would wake up tomorrow, take a long look in the mirror and say "I think I'm going to burn in Hell - my approach has been incorrect. "

He'd be given a full pardon by Our Lord at his Martyrdom a week later.! 😃
De Profundis
Abortion will be the next issue up for debate in the Church
Rafał_Ovile
Abortion will be the next issue up for debate in the Church Francis' church. 😉 Pray for living pope Benedict XVI and support the Catholic Church. 😇
Ultraviolet
"Pray for living pope Benedict XVI" @Rafal_Ovile
---
Benedict explained that when he initially stepped down he wanted to be called “Father Benedict” rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI, but “I was too weak at that point to enforce it.” At least part of the reason for wanting his new title to simply be “Father” rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI is to put more space between him …More
"Pray for living pope Benedict XVI" @Rafal_Ovile
---
Benedict explained that when he initially stepped down he wanted to be called “Father Benedict” rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI, but “I was too weak at that point to enforce it.” At least part of the reason for wanting his new title to simply be “Father” rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI is to put more space between him and the role of the pope, so that there is no confusion as to who the “true Pope” is
-
Citation: tektonministries.org/…imply-call-me-father-benedict/
Gesù è con noi
Jorge Mario Bergoglio el "papa" de los apostatas, de los sodomitas, de los adúlteros, de los impenitentes, de todos los enemigos de Dios.
Gesù è con noi
Nunca hubo sucesión apostólica porque el Papa Benedicto XVI nunca renunció al munus sino al ejercicio activo como obispo de Roma.
Ultraviolet
The GTV link shows the film-maker is a liar and discredited himself.. Raises an obvious question abut the film-maker's other allegations, yes?