THE PANDEMIC GREAT DECEIT: THE COVID VIRUS HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED.
FOIs (safeopedia.com/definition/340/freedom-of-information-foi) reveal that health/science institutions around the world (138 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. (Can you spot the oxymoron in that quote?)
Sally Fallon Morell, MA: andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
or watch this 5 minute video from Dr. Cowan.
Or go here for many more resources,
and corroborating evidence.
A colleague in New Zealand (Michael S.) and I (CM) and many other people around the world have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to institutions in various countries seeking records that describe the isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.
The reason: without the crucial step of isolation/purification having been performed (from many patients, followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged “novel coronavirus” (blamed for widespread death/disease/lockdown measures) actually exists.
Without this step having been performed and followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged “virus” are nothing but wild speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests and fraud-based diagnoses.
The requests submitted by Michael and I (and many of the other submitters) have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”) isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.
Thus far (November 22, 2021) 41 Canadian institutions have provided their responses: Public Health Agency of Canada (and another from Public Health Agency of Canada, this one re the alleged “UK variant” aka “B.1.1.7” aka “Alpha”; and another from Public Health Agency of Canada re any alleged virus/variant), Health Canada (and another from Health Canada; and another from Health Canada), the National Research Council of Canada, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre (VIDO-InterVac), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Public Health Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Health (and another from Ontario Ministry of Health re “delta variant”, University Health Network, Ontario Ministry of the Solicitor General and Ontario Provincial Police, Alberta Ministry of Health, Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, his Office and Executive Council, Calgary Police Service, Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec (another from Public Health Quebec), British Columbia’s Ministry of Health (re “the UK variant”), British Columbia’s Centre for Disease Control, British Columbia’s Provincial Health Services Authority (2 responses, 1 re “SARS-COV-2”, 1 re the alleged “B.1.1.7” aka “Alpha variant” aka “UK variant”), Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (re “B.1.1.7” aka “Alpha variant” aka “UK variant”), Newfoundland Labrador Department of Health & Community Services, New Brunswick’s Department/Ministry of Health, McGill University, University of Ottawa, the City of Toronto, Toronto Police (and another from Toronto Police), Halton Region, Hamilton Police Service (Ontario), the Region of Peel (Ontario), Region of Durham (Ontario); KFL&A Public Health (Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington, Ontario, re “any variant”), Grey Bruce Health Services, Grey Bruce Health Unit, Niagara Regional Police Service, Peterborough Public Health (Ontario), Peterborough Police Service (Ontario) (another from Peterborough Police), Aylmer Police Service (Ontario) (and another from Aylmer Police), Hastings Prince Edward Public Health (Ontario), the University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University and Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto) (note that researchers from the last 4 institutions had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”, as had VIDO-Intervac).
Every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
(And, to our knowledge, no one on the planet has ever purified the alleged “virus” even from a cell culture!)
Canadian public health officials have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification performed anywhere, ever
September 27, 2021:
Ontario’s Ministry of the Solicitor General ripped up and mailed back my FOI application cheque, allegedly because “an original request was not included with the payment” – despite having already acknowledged my “original” FOI request that was sent via email to Ontario Provincial Police (which is currently being exposed for their participation in the global “covid” fraud). Hmm, what could be their motivation?
Click on the above links to access the responses from Canadian institutions. Scroll further down this page for responses from institutions outside of Canada.
This link will take you to a google drive folder where all of the FOI documents as of October 7, 2021 are publicly available and GROUPED BY COUNTRY (for the most part):
google.com/drive/folders/1okJiB4PdWN3tiei_g67zTUfok92kuqqS
Click here for compilation pdfs containing FOI responses from 127 institutions in >25 countries/jurisdictions (in somewhat CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER), re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”, as well as emails from authors of studies that claimed to have “isolated the virus” and an email from the Head of the Consultant Laboratory for Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Infectious Pathogens at Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (note: many of these responses were obtained by FOI-submitters other than Michael S. and myself, as indicated further down this page).
Check back here (the page you are currently on) for regular updates.
As of November 22, 2021: 138 institutions and offices in over 25 countries have responded thus far, as well as some “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study authors, and none have provided or cited any record describing actual “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification.
Numerous institutions have also made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
Click here to see an Excel file listing the 138 institutions (last updated November 22, 2021):
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…uploads/2021/11/Institution-list-for-website11.xls
bitchute.com/video/sC6QUy8jVU3T/
The list shown below was current as of October 5, 2021.
(And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the Methods used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19”.)
Notes:
Anyone is welcome to post these documents on other sites.
I would only ask that they also refer people to this particular webpage because this is where all the new responses get added, so it’s the place to go for the most recent and complete collection of FOIs.
Global Research posted the entire FOI collection (as of August 04, 2021) on their website. GR’s webpages can be translated into 51 different languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of the home page:
globalresearch.ca/…cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
Here is a tiny URL that re-directs to this webpage:
http://tinyurl.com/norecordfound
Donations to support this work are greatly needed and appreciated! See bottom of this page for details.
FOI responses from institutions in the U.S., India, Republic of South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Colombia, Uruguay, Italy, Portugal, Brazil, Republic of Colombia, Ilse of Man, Phillipines, etc., plus emails from Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (RKI) and several “virus isolation authors”.
A big Thank You to all the individuals who have now kindly shared additional responses that they obtained re isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”. Some prefer to remain anonymous, others are named below.
[Also note that we have a collection of responses from the U.S. CDC, Public Health Agency of Canada, New Zealand Ministry of Health, etc. in regards to isolation/purification of a number of other alleged “viruses”, i.e. “HIV”, “measles virus”, “polio virus”, “HPV”, “Ebola virus”, “Zika virus”, “XMRV”, “HTLV1”, “HTLV-III/LAV”, 2003 “SARS-COV”, “MERS virus”, any common cold “coronavirus”, “Marburg virus” any “virus” on their “immunization” schedules. Again, none have yielded any records or citations of records describing the isolation/purification of any “virus” from a patient sample. Click here to see those responses:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ng-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/]
As this next link you will see a “no records of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification” FOI response from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), dated November 2, 2020:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…0/11/USA-CDC-Virus-Isolation-Response-Scrubbed.pdf
On March 1, 2021 once again the CDC made clear to Michael S. that they still have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever… just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation of “SARS-COV-2” would require the replication of a “virus” without host cells and thus is impossible.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-1-2021-SARS-COV-2-Isolation-Response-Redacted.pdf
March 3, 2021: CDC again failed to provide/cite any records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification by anyone anywhere ever… BUT would no longer simply say so (as they did back on November 2nd); instead they gave Michael S. some song and dance and cited their own fraudulent study (by Harcourt et al.):
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ch-3-2021-SARS-COV-2-purification-FOI-response.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…st-response-no-records-SARS-COV-2-purification.pdf
September 8, 2021: Another FOIA response from the CDC re purification of the phantom “SARS-COV-2”. This time, CDC cited a paper wherein the authors never even claimed to have purified any “virus” themselves, and instead falsely stated that: “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated in Vero cells … (8)” [oxymoron]. [CDC’s reference #8 is the infamous Harcourt et al. study.]
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ontent/uploads/2021/09/Sept-8-2021-CDC-package.pdf
October 26, 2021:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention once again failed to provide or cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone, anywhere on the planet:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…21/11/CDC-2021-10-23-SARS-COV-2-v3-BS-redacted.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…020/12/CDC-isolation-FOI-reply-any-coronavirus.pdf
September 3, 2021: Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) / National Institutes of Health, in response to a request for records that demonstrate that NIAID or NIH has a physical sample of purified “SARS-CoV-2”:
– conflates isolation/purification with growth of the imaginary virus in cell culture,
– provides irrelevant, distracting comments re Koch’s Postulates,
– cites useless, irrelevant studies and webpages, and fabricated computer “genomes”, and
-confirms that virology isn’t a science.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-content/uploads/2021/09/NIAID-NIH-Sept-3-2021.pdf
August 19, 2021:
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services cited useless, irrelevant studies and webpages, and fabricated computer “genomes” in response to an FOIA request for “Records that demonstrates the US Department of Health and Human Services has a physical sample of the isolated and purified SARS-CoV-2 virus…”
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…US-Health-and-Human-Services-response-redacted.pdf
Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) failed to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample by anyone, anywhere.
NIAID referred me to the anti-science CDC study by Harcourt et al., even after I’d advised them of CDC’s June 7, 2021 ‘no records’ response. I have appealed to NIAID’s FOIA Public Liaison.
The communications between myself and NIAID are provided here:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…nt/uploads/2021/06/NIAID-FOIA-package-redacted.pdf
The CDC study cited by NIAID did not purify anything from a patient sample. It is the same study that Dr. Thomas Cowan wrote about in 2020 (“Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’“) where he also addressed the fraudulent nature of the authors’ fabricated “SARS-COV-2 genome” (as shown in the screenshot below).
Ron kindly provided a screenshot of his communications with NIAID, shown below.
Note that NIH/NIAID failed to answer any of Ron Bublitz’s questions and merely cited the same CDC study by Harcourt et al. mentioned above that indulged in the typical fraudulent “monkey business” approach to so-called “isolation” – as shown in the screenshot below).
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…h-PH-HIV-Hep-B-Hep-C-SARSCOV2-package-redacted.pdf
October 23, 2021:
The Assistant General Counsel at Clemson University, South Carolina confirmed for the requester that the University does not have any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, despite their Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences recently receiving $900,000 to study the alleged “virus”:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…n-University-2021-10-23-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
October 15, 2021:
Illinois’s Office of the Governor confirmed that they located no studies describing isolation and analysis of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” aka “SARS-COV-2”:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…21/11/Illinois-Officer-of-Governor-Oct-15-2021.jpg
September 24, 2021:
Wisconsin Governor and Department of Health Services confirmed for Charles R. Haeuser that they have no record regarding isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” (or regarding safety and/or approval of so-called “vaccines”). (The DHS did provide attachments regarding Wisconsin’s “COVID-19 Community Outreach Grant”; click here to see or download them.)
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…r-and-Dept-of-Health-Services-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 29, 2021:
Metro Public Health Department, Nashville, Tennessee advised that “No such record(s) exists, or this office does not maintain record(s) responsive to” a request from Irucka Embry re purification of the alleged “SARS-COV-2” or the complete matching of “virus genomic sequences” from victims of the alleged virus in Metro Nashville and Wuhan, China.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…Metro-PHD-Nashville-Tennessee-redacted-PACKAGE.pdf
August 18, 2021:
Arizona Department of Health Services confirmed for Timothy Martin that they have no record describing isolation/purification of any “SARS-COV-2” from any patient sample on the planet, and confuse such with private/protected/identifiable healthcare data:fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/10/Arizona-Dept-Health-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 20: Florida Department of Health provided irrelevant, fraud-based PCR documentation and a major run-around in response to Beatrice Biddle’s request for records describing purification of the theoretical “COVID-19 virus”… rather than simply admit “we have no records”. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…21/10/Florida-Dept-Health-etc-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 30, 2021: New York State Department of Health advised William Huston that they have zero records indicating that the alleged “SARS-CoV-2” is the cause of “COVID-19.”
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ds/2021/10/NY-State-DH-no-records-Sept-30-2021.pdf
September 17, 2021: Lithuania’s National Public Health Care Laboratory provided Arturas Bartasius with useless PCR documents and confirmed that “isolation of SARS-CoV-2 virus in cell cultures [oxymoron!], electron microscopy and virus purification (filtration, ultracentrifugation, chromatography) NVSPL is not performed“.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…BLIC-HEALTH-CARE-LABORATORY-PACKAGE-unredacted.pdf
2021 (Jan. 9 or Sept. 1, I’m not sure which): Serbia’s Ministry of Health told the ASSOCIATION OF “PARENTS OF MISSING BABIES OF SERBIA” that they have no records re isolation of the alleged/imaginary COVID-19 virus, or any of the other requested info. English translation and signed affidavit included:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…istry-of-Health-WITH-AFFIDAVIT-AND-TRANSLATION.pdf
May & August 2021: Oregon Health & Science University failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing purification of the alleged COVID-19 virus (aka “SARS-COV-2”) from any patient sample, by anyone on the planet, for the requester.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…t/uploads/2021/09/Oregon-OHSU-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Via Dr. Fabio Franchi, author of “COVID-19. The catastrophe caused by the virus that is not there“, Dr. Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Director of Virology, Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani (National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani), Italy failed to provide or cite even 1 record re purification of the alleged COVID-19 virus aka “SARS-COV-2”.
FOI response and Dr. Franchi’s reply (including attachments) is here, with English translations:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-2-isolation-purification-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/
October 29, 2021?
Italy’s Ministry of Health failed to provide or cite any study or report (evidence) (or webpage citing such) re the isolation/purification of the alleged Sars-Cov-2 virus or any alleged variant, for the requester:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…1/11/Italy-Ministry-of-Health-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 31, 2021: The Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Department of Health, Phillipines. Article and FOI response: CCH FOI Bombshell: DOH Admits No Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Isolated. Yet Government Locked Down Nation Due to Virus No Country Has Yet Proven to Exist.
covidcalltohumanity.org/…n-due-to-virus-no-country-has-yet-proven-to-exist/
FOI response backed up here:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ines-Department-of-Health-response-Aug-31-2021.pdf
The Massachusetts responses in the above article are also backed-up at the following links:
August 11, 2021
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the Governor told Ramola Dharmaraj “we have no records” re isolation of (the alleged) SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 virus:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…CE-OF-THE-GOVERNOR-Response_Letter_-_Dharmaraj.pdf
August 25, 2021
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Health: “The Department has no responsive records to your request.”
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…wealth-of-Massachusetts-Dept-of-Health-package.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…inia-Dept-of-General-Services-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 1, 2021: The Pennsylvania Department of Health confirmed they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…9/Pennsylvania-Dept-of-Health-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 30, 2021: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania confirms they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere, or any proof of “its” existence:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ounty-Pennsylvania-no-records-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 13, 2021: The General Counsel and FOI Officer for the Washington DC Department of Health confirmed for the requester that the Department has no record describing the purification of any “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”, including any alleged “variants” i.e. “B.1.1.7”, “B.1.351”, “P.1”) directly from a patient sample. Full communication:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…H_DC_-FOIA_001_RFI_08_11_2021-redacted-package.pdf
August 2021: Michigan Department of Health and Human Services confirmed for Andrew Nihem that they have no record describing purification of “the virus” (including any alleged “variants”) from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…igan-Dept-of-Health-and-Human-Services-package.pdf
August 18, 2021: California’s Department of Public Health confirmed for Kim Leonoudakis that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) having been purified from any patient sample on the planet and no analysis whatsoever re the alleged “Delta variant”:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…oads/2021/09/California-DPH-FOIA-P013439080421.pdf
August 24, 2021: California’s Department of Public Health confirmed for Robin that they have no record of “the virus” (including any “variants”) having been purified from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…nia-Dept-Public-Health-P013542-081421-redacted.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ealth-no-records-email-response-Aug-9-redacted.pdf
After a series of Freedom of Information requests beginning in April 2020 failed to yield any satisfactory response, Ricardo Maarman (working alongside Dr. Faiez Kirsten) challenged the South African government in the Western Cape High Court in May 2021 to provide proof of “the virus” that allegedly justifies that government’s devastating lockdown measures.
(More specifically, Ricardo challenged the President, the National Department of Health, the Governmental COVID-19 Advisory Committee and the Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs. And the responding affidavit was authored primarily by the Acting Executive Director of South Africa’s National Institute for Communicable Diseases.)
The government failed to provide proof or even compelling evidence, and on pages 29+ of their responding affidavit (starting on page 31 of the pdf) revealed that they have relied on a “well established” but unscientific approach to “virus isolation”.
And the SA government’s discussion of the Bradford-Hill criteria glosses over the fact that these criteria presuppose the existence and valid measurement of the potentially causative factor under investigation, when the reality is that no test ever has been or could have been validated for the never-purified, never-characterized, never-sequenced particles alleged to be “the virus”.
The judge ruled that the matter is not urgent and struck the matter from her roll. Ricardo will be pursuing this further. The notice of motion, hearing transcript, court ruling, other documentation and interviews about this case are posted on a dedicated website:
showusthevirus.info.
The court document’s URL is andre-dias.net/wp-content/uploads/Fwd-Sentenca.pdf (and we have backed it up at fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ontent/uploads/2021/06/Portuguese-court-ruling.pdf).
According to Ms. Farber’s published June 28, 2021 email interview with Dias, who is an expert in lung disease modeling, the court ruling is in regards to a citizen’s petition to the Ministry of Health, “equivalent to a Freedom of Information Request…that ended up in court – with epidemiological and statistical queries“, and “the court also formalized that the ministry has no data or references about the existence of the virus…”
Ms. Farber advises that an English translation of the court ruling is in the works and will be shared on her website once it’s prepared. Below is a screenshot from the original document showing some of the questions that had been posed to Portugal’s Ministry of Health, for which they apparently had no answers.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…oads/2021/07/Brazil-Ministry-of-Health-package.pdf
The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) is an FDA-like quackcine-approver. In their FOI response to Marcella Picone, they explained that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and are not required to by law, thus it is (in their minds) not their obligation to make sure that “the virus” actually exists. Full communication:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-content/uploads/2021/07/Brazil-ANVISA-package.pdf
torstenengelbrecht.com/…p-content/uploads/RKI_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf
The starting point for this paper is a so-called SARS-COV-2 isolate named “MUC-IMB1” (referred to simply as “MUC-1” in the paper’s supporting materials). Turonova et al. credit G. Dobler of the Bundeswehr Institute for Microbiology for providing them this “isolate”.
I contacted Dr. Gerhard Dobler to confirm details about “MUC-1” (which goes by several different names including Germany/BavPat1/2020), and it turns out that MUC-1 is another result of the monkey-business methodology cited at the top of this page. (The emails and more details are posted here: MUC-1 aka MUC-IMB1: just more Corman/Drosten monkey business fraud.) MUC-1 is not isolated/purified “virus” nor was it ever shown to contain any “virus”.
(Dr. Andrew Kaufman recently commented on this same paper by Turonova et al.; to see his video summary go to “Bonus Video”:
andrewkaufmanmd.com/covid-19-myths-public-release/.)
Also on Torsten Engelbrecht’s website are links to email responses from authors of “SARS-COV-2” studies, starting with the Zhu et al paper cited above by Dr. Michael Laue. None provided any evidence or assurance re purification of “the virus”. The following is copied and pasted from Torsten’s homepage:
“Na Zhu et al. (NEJM): “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones” (see Email).
Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris (Nature Medicine): “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus” (see Email).
Sharon R. Lewin et al. (The Medical Journal of Australia): ““The nucleic acid extraction was performed on isolate material recovered from infected cells. This material was not centrifuged, so was not purified through sucrose gradient to have a density band as such. The EM images were obtained directly from cell culture material” (see Email).
Myung-Guk Han et al. (Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives): “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells” (see Email).
Wan Beom Park et al. (Journal of Korean Medical Science): “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see Email).”
January 13, 2021: Norway’s Ministry of Health and Care Services failed to provide or cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation from a sample from a symptomatic patient, where the sample was not adulterated with additional genetic material, by anyone anywhere, for the requester Martiens Bekker. Request and response with English translation:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/06/Norway-Ministry-of-Health-cites-no-records.pdf
April 25, 2021: the Norwegian Directorate of Health (which is under the Ministry of Health and Care Services) failed to provide or cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, and provided a silly excuse instead:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ploads/2021/06/Norwegian-Directorate-of-Health.pdf
May, 2021 Uruguay’s Clemente Stable Biological Research Institute (under the Ministry of Education and Culture) and the Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Republic provided/cited no records of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone anywhere, for requester María Bettina Galo. Both responses:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-Culture-Faculty-of-Chem-U-of-Repub-no-records.pdf
June 7 2021: Uruguay Ministry of Public Health failed to provide or cite for requester María Bettina Galo any record of “SARS-COV-2” purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever and claimed they can’t understand the request:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…guay-Ministry-of-Public-Health-of-Res-377-2021.pdf
Once again, Uruguay Ministry of Public Health was queried by María Bettina Galo re “SARS-COV-2” purification. The answer: “We are not aware that SARS COV 2 has been cultivated“… even though Bettina hadn’t asked about “cultivation”, which is the opposite of purifying anything.
See page 20:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…FECTOS-ADVERSOS-DOCUMENTO_Maria-Bettina-Galo-1.pdf
March 30, 2021: Oregon Health Authority confirmed they have no record re purification of any “SARS-COV-2” from any patient sample in the world: See the full wording of the request, and response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/2021/05/Oregon-HA-March-2021-request-response.pdf
May 22, 2021: Ministry of Health and Social Protection, Republic of Colombia admits they have no record re purification of “SARS-COV-2” from a patient sample, by anyone anywhere. Full letter:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ploads/2021/06/FOI-Colombia-no-records-package.pdf
Note that ICRM has fraudulently claimed to have isolated “the virus” and the imaginary UK scariant, to have been tracking “the virus” across India, has developed a COVID-19 quackcine, shares ownership rights on the quackcine and is a member of guess WHO’s Global Health Workforce Network.
The 1 record cited by ICMR is a correspondence entitled “First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India” published in the Indian Journal of Medical Research which is a journal published for the ICRM. According to the correspondence “The designated COVID-19 testing laboratories …referred the specimens …to the Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology (ICMR-NIV), Pune, after screening for envelope (E) gene by realtime RT-PCR was done.” Three of of co-the authors are affiliated with ICRM.
ICMR’s full response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ouncil-Medical-Research-request-reply-redacted.pdf
Yash, the requester for the above FOI to ICMR, then appealed the ICMR’s response, pointing out that the study cited by ICMR was exactly what he had specified he was not requesting (because it has nothing to do with isolating/purifying an alleged “virus”).
The July 12, 2021 response to his appeal: “The reply provided to the applicant is in order and satisfactory.”
Yash’s appeal and response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…tent/uploads/2021/08/ICMR-first-APPEAL-package.pdf
June 28, 2021, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) once again fails to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and cites more “monkey-business” fraud, this time through their National Institute of Virology. Note the World Health Organization logo and reference in the footer of the letter. Here is the URL for the image: fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/India-ICMR.jpeg
Next is a 2nd FOI response of June 28 2021 from the Indian Council of Medical Research failing again to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and citing the same anti-science papers, this time in response to requester Trinayan Das. ICMR was also asked additional questions re PCR, and responded that it is the “gold standard” for detection (“very accurately”! “confirms the presence”!!). Full response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ICMR-June-28-2.pdf
September 14, 2021:
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Ústav organické chemie a biochemie AV ČR, v. v. i. (Prague) advised that they have never purified the alleged COVID-19 virus from any patient sample, but convinced themselves they had a sample of “it” by fabricating a “genome” from RNA sequences found in their monkey cell culture.fluoridefreepeel.ca/…loads/2021/10/Czech-UOCHB-FOI-ANSWER-14.9.2021.pdf
Univerzita Karlova: “This from the No.1 university in Czech R. As answer, they inform us, that “there is broad consensus in the international scientific community” about precise RNA sequence of SARS-Cov2, about its chemical and protein structure and it causing COVID19.”
Thus Univerzita Karlova failed to provide any record proving the purification or existence of “the virus”:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Czech-university.pdf
Czech Ministry of Health: “This is the response of Czech ministry of health. When a proof of existence of the SARS-Cov2 virus was requested…”
The references cited by the Ministry are in English and do not describe purification of an alleged virus, let alone scientific study of such. Full letter:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ntent/uploads/2021/05/Czech-ministry-of-health.pdf
I personally cannot read this next document from the Ukraine’s Ministry of Health dated March 15, 2021, but am told that the Ministry stated here that they do not have any “SARS-COV-2” isolate, nor do they intend to obtain any.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FOI-RIVM2.pdf
August 24, 2021: Sweden’s Public Health Authority also can’t find “the virus”. John Blaid submitted a formal FOI request to for records describing purification of “the virus” from any patient sample (not adulterated with genetic material, i.e. monkey cells, fetal bovine serum) on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. The response: “No, no such documents exist.” Full correspondence:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/Sweden-Public-Health-Authority-FHM-2021-08-24.pdf
“Hello John!
The registrar and the communications department at Karolinska Institute have now replied that they do not have access to this information.At present, the university library does not have the opportunity to perform search assignments for external customers. One suggestion is to do a search in the freely available database PubMed. If you have the opportunity to visit us, you can also use other databases. ki.se/om-kib/kontakt-oppettider
PubMed contains the MeSH term SARS-CoV-2 / isolation and purification, which currently provides 5251 references.nih.gov/?term="SARS-CoV-2/isolation+and+purification"&sort.””
Karolinska Institute’s response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…oads/2021/10/Karolinska-Institute-2021-10-18-3.pdf
April 26, 2021: Once again the Dutch Minister for Health, Well-being & Sport (the Netherlands) replied to an FOI sent to its agency RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) re purification of “the virus”; the Minister provided/cited zero such records for Gabriëlle Rutten, and cited cell culture anti-science instead. Full correspondence:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…uploads/2021/07/Wob-verzoek-no-records-package.pdf
Feb 18, 2021: The Isle of Man’s Department of Health and Social Care admitted in a FOI response to Mr. Steven Gardner that:
– “the virus” is not isolated/purified;
– 45 PCR cycles!
and gave false info re sequences used in PCR “tests”. Full unredacted pdf:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ntent/uploads/2021/07/Isle-of-Man-FOI-response.pdf
August 23, 2021:
Once again New Zealand‘s Ministry of Health confirmed for Michael S. that neither they nor New Zealand’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), have any record of the phantom “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) purified from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…iants-Purification-Request-Response-Redacted-1.pdf
August 26, 2021:
Once again New Zealand‘s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), confirms they have no record of the phantom “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) purified from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…SR-2021-08-26-Purification-SARS-COV-2-Variants.pdf
Here are 5 pages of pure gold, evidencing masterful evasion plus stunning incompetence and/or fraud from New Zealand’s Ministry of Health. Instead of providing the requests records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification and proof of accurate diagnostic tests, they blathered about genomes and cultures of the never-isolated imaginary virus; stated that PCR tests have been validated around the world and are the gold standard; and cited a February 2020 preliminary report (“The Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 Transgenic Mice”) that used the so-called “SARS-COV-2” strain that had been concocted by Zhu et al. and claimed that Koch’s Postulates had been fulfilled.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…loads/2021/01/NZ-Min-Health-2nd-FOI-no-records.pdf
March 22, 2021, New Zealand’s Ministry of Heath confirms they still have no record describing purification of “the virus” and hence zero proof of its existence, and they choose to cite fraudulent studies instead (the infamous Harcourt et al. study mentioned above and the Australian paper cited at the top of this page). Full pdf response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-03-22-NZ-MOH-Purification-SARS-COV-2-redacted.pdf
April 23, 2021 Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern‘s Office, New Zealand, again confirms they have no record describing purification of “SARS-COV-2” by anyone, anywhere, ever. Full pdf response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ds/2021/05/NZ-PMO-23.04.2021-2021-068-Redacted.pdf
New Zealand’s University of Auckland was disappointingly non-cooperative, the only institution as of October 8th failing to simply admit that they have no such records, opting instead for a sketchy “refusal” of my colleague’s request. Let’s face it, if the University actually had any such records (that no one else on the planet appears have) and they are publicly available, the University of Auckland would have proudly provided links/citations. But they didn’t. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…t/uploads/2020/10/Auckland-redacted-FOI-emails.pdf
New Zealand’s University of Otago, where Professor Miguel Quiñones-Mateu, Ph.D. claimed months ago to have “isolated the virus”, responded that they too have “no records” describing isolation of SARS-COV-2 from a sample not already adulterated with other genetic material: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ulterated-sample-anywhere-on-earth-by-anyone-ever/
March 30, 2021 New Zealand’s University of Otago confirm they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification, by anyone anywhere. Full response pdf here:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…y-of-Otago-Purification-of-SARS-COV-2-redacted.pdf
New Zealand’s University of Otago, where researchers claimed last year ago to have “isolated the virus”, confirmed once again they actually have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification, by anyone, anywhere:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-30-University-of-Otago-SARS-COV-2-v3-Redacted.pdf
October 13, 2021:
New Zealand’s University of Waikato confirmed for the requester that they have no record describing purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” (or “variants”) from any patient sample on the planet:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…y-of-Waikato-2021-10-13-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
November 9, 2021
New Zealand Police confirmed for the requester that they have no record (evidence) describing isolation/purification of the alleged Sars-Cov-2 virus or any alleged variant:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/NZ-Police-2021-11-09-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
March 9, 2021: New Zealand’s Institute of Environmental Science and Research admits that they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification (performed by anyone on the planet, anywhere, ever):
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/03/ESR-SARS-COV-2-Purification-Redacted.pdf
One of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Jenny Salesa has “no records”:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-Min-Health-Hon-Jenny-Salesa-Response-scrubbed.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…020/10/Hon-Julie-Anne-Genter-Response-scrubbed.pdf
And another of New Zealand’s Associate Ministers of Health Peeni Henare has “no records”:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ads/2020/10/Hon-Peeni-Henare-Response-scrubbed.pdf
Same, “no records” says Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Tauranga Hospital, New Zealand:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…Plenty-District-Health-Board-response-scrubbed.pdf
October 5, 2021: University of New South Wales, Australia advised that they still have no record of any “COVID-19 virus/variant” having been purified from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/2021/10/University-of-New-South-Wales-PACKAGE.pdf
June 16, 2021: University of Western Australia – home of Gates-funded researcher Christine Carson, who has spent countless hours on social media this past year insisting “yes the COVID-19 virus has been isolated” – provided/cited zero records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification from a patient sample, by anyone anywhere ever:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…uploads/2021/06/UWA-Carson-no-records-redacted.pdf
At this next link you will find multiple “no records” FOI responses from Australia’s Department of Health, as recent as October 2021:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-health-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/
Same admission from Australia’s Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity (which had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”).
Same admission from Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”), which is involved in “COVID-19” vaccine trials using the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” from Doherty Institute:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…oads/2020/10/CSIRO-Isolation-Response-scrubbed.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…records-CSIRO-SARS-COV-2-Purification-Redacted.pdf
September 27, 2021:
Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”), which is involved in “COVID-19” vaccine trials using the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” from Doherty Institute, confirmed that they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” (including “variants”) purification, by anyone, anywhere:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…021/09/2021-09-27-CSIRO-SARS-COV-2-v3-Redacted.pdf
[When reviewing Coatsworth’s response, bear in mind the following facts provided us by Darren Christison, a journalist in Sydney, Australia: “This is the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who is the ‘poster boy’ for the Australian government’s push to vaccinate everyone until they urinate the poison, and has been a permanent fixture on TV and online in recent months (youtube.com/watch?v=Aep_RKawTWc). He’s also the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who recently, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, ‘admonished a “hardcore rump of activist doctors” spreading misinformation and undermining vaccine confidence” (smh.com.au/…re-for-the-return-of-covid-19-20210514-p57s1u.html).]
Coatsworth admitted that Canberra Health Services holds no records relevant to the topic of isolating (aka purifying) the alleged “SARS-COV-2”. His entire letter is here:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/04/Australian-Dept-of-Health-March-2021.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…CT-Canberra-Health-Services-no-records-package.pdf
Mar 16 2021: Western Australia Minister & Department of Health confirm they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (and thus zero proof that “the virus” exists), and that PathWest Laboratory Medicine only does the quackery version of “virus isolation”. Full communications:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/07/Western-Australia-no-records-package.pdf
April 28, 2021: South Australia Minister for Health and Wellbeing confirmed they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (and thus zero proof that “the virus” actually exists). Full communications:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ads/2021/07/South-Australia-package-no-records.pdf
May 25, 2021: New South Wales Ministry of Health, Australia, confirmed they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (and thus zero proof that “the virus” actually exists). Full communications:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ent/uploads/2021/07/NSW-no-records-May-25-2021.pdf
October 27, 2021:
The UK’s new euphemistically-named Health Security Agency confirmed that they have no records re isolation/purification of the alleged COVID-19 virus. The requester wrote back with a lovely response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…oads/2021/11/UKHSA-2021-10-27-Replies-redacted.pdf
No records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation, admits the U.K. Department of Health and Social Care (note: there are not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, but 5 such responses from DHSC – the most recent dated October 11, 2021): fluoridefreepeel.ca/…al-care-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/
[Note The U.K. Department of Health and Social Care has kept us waiting for 2 months already on an FOI request for (at most) 3 days worth of analysis on their alleged “new variant” announced by Matt Hancock on December 14 2020: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…DHSC-handling-of-Dec14-FOI-re-socalled-variant.pdf]
UK’s Government Office for Science has no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ulterated-sample-anywhere-on-earth-by-anyone-ever/
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…nment-Office-of-Science-SARS-COV-2-v3-Redacted.pdf
Same, from the UK’s Cabinet Office and the UK Prime Minister’s Office, in response to a query from Marc Horn. See here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…1/Cabinet-Office-isolation-FOI2020-10121-Reply.pdf and here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…inisters-Office-FOI-reply-isolation-SARS-COV-2.pdf
Here is a sketchy FOI reply from the U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (obtained by Mr. Athanasios Kandias). The agency provided/cited no records re “SARS-COV-2” isolation. Their response includes an (apparently fraudulent) claim that such records are available in the public domain, but they provided zero links/citations despite having been asked for the location of any such records. Excerpts are shown below. Full response: whatdotheyknow.com/request/documents_held_showing_sars_cov2_2
Pdf: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…roducts-Regulatory-Agency-no-isolation-records.pdf
May 4, 2021: University of Warwick (UK) admits that they hold no record describing “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…05/University-of-Warwick-F352.20-21-May-4-2021.pdf
Regarding “BNT162b2”, the mRNA ingredient in the Pfizer-BioNTech “Covid-19 vaccine”, that is allegedly transcribed from the the alleged corresponding genetic template that allegedly encodes the alleged viral spike (S) protein of the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus”, U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency admitted to investigative journalist Frances Leader that: the genetic template on which it (“BNT162b2”) is based “does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person“, rather it “was generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology“. The email exchange is available here:
hive.blog/…ov2-mrna-genomic-sequence-is-synthetic-3rd-edition
and in a pdf here:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/UK-MHRA-emails-w-FL.pdf.
No EM photos of purified “SARS-COV-2”, no peer reviewed paper with the genome of purified “SARS-COV-2”, no proof that “the virus” causes “COVID-19”, etc — says UK’s Cabinet Office in response to the queries shown below from Bartholomeus Lakeman; full letter here: whatdotheyknow.com/…esponse/1589609/attach/3/FOI2020 06375 Draft 1.pdf and preserved here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…eus-Lakeman-Cabinet-Office-isolation-FOI-reply.pdf
Same, from the UK’s House of Lords, in response to a query from Marc Horn: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/House-of-Lords-FOI-reply-isolation-SARS-COV-2.pdf
October 19, 2021: East Midlands – Leicestershire County Council in the UK confirmed for the requester that they have no record of any “COVID-19 virus/variant” purified from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet – and thus zero evidence of “its” existence:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/East-Midlands-Leicestershire-%E2%80%93-Mike-Sandys-SARS-CoV-2-PURIFICATION-FOI-RESPONSE-1.pdf
October 30, 2021:
Suffolk County Council in England confirmed for Yvonne Hobbs that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone on the planet, and no records proving a causal link between the imaginary virus and (PCR results packaged as) “covid-19”.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…021/11/Suffolk-County-Council-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 20, 2021:
Public Health London Hammersmith and Fulham in the UK confirmed for the requester that they have no record of any “COVID-19 virus/variant” purified from any patient sample by anyone, anywhere on the planet, and no record proving a causal link between the alleged virus and “COVID-19” – and thus zero evidence of “its” existence:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…London-Hammersmith-and-Fulham-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 28, 2021:
Brighton and Hove City Council in England confirmed for Yvonne Hobbs that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification by anyone on the planet:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/11/Brighton-SARS-COV-2-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
(Click here to see a series of “COVID-19” FOI requests submitted by Marc Horn to various agencies: whatdotheyknow.com/user/marc_horn)
Same, from Public Health Scotland in response to Athanasios Kandias: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…loads/2020/10/PH-Scotland-RESPONSE-2020-000133.pdf
September 10, 2021: Public Health Scotland confirmed once again, this time for Richard Anthony, that they have no purified sample of the alleged “COVID=19 virus/variants” and know of no one in Scotland who does, and they equated isolation/purification with meaningless, unscientific monkey cell culturing. Pdf:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/uploads/2021/10/Scotland-PH-FOI-2021-000848-2.pdf
Public Health Wales provided Dr. Janet Menage a sketchy excuse for not properly assisting with her request (Dr. Menage has submitted a complaint to the PHW ‘Corporate Complaints’ team); see PHW’s response here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…uplic-Health-Wales-453-Isolation-of-Sars-COV-2.pdf
Below is a screenshot of a Freedom of Information response to Mr. James McCumiskey, author of The Latest Conspiracy: The Biomedical Paradigm, from the University College Dublin, explaining that Ireland’s National Virus Reference Laboratory has no records describing “how the Novel Coronavirus was purifiedfluoridefreepeel.ca/…g-purification-of-a-covid-19-virus-aka-sars-cov-2/. Click the link for more details.
Related video: Denmark health officials became indignant and defensive during a press conference when asked by journalist Kristofer Krarup about the FOI responses from their own institutions indicating they have zero proof of “the virus”:
bitchute.com/video/AiwB5h4VCnTH/
April 2020: In response to a query from to Dr. Kevin Corbett, Public Health England admitted using fake virus material to evaluate “COVID-19” tests, that the gold standard is not isolated virus, and more: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…th-englands-answers-to-covid-19-testing-questions/
Months ago, the StandUpX Science Committee published an open letter dated June 22, 2020 to the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Below is a screenshot from their letter, demanding scientific proof of the alleged “COVID-19 virus”. (Their entire letter can be viewed and/or downloaded here: kevinpcorbett.com/onewebmedia/Signed StandUpX definitive.pdf)
Below is footage of Piers Corbyn calling out the UK government for the non-isolation of their theoretical “SARS-COV-2 virus”. bitchute.com/video/1eDDh3eqFPAJ/ ERRATUM: In the description underneath the video (on the bitchute page) the authors of the publication on the Drosten PCR test are referred to has ‘Drosten et al’ when it should read ‘Croman et al’.
StandUpX has a petition entitled “If there’s no proof the virus exists end all Lockdowns/Masks/Trax/Vax actions“. If you can tell the difference between isolation and fraudulent monkey business, please consider signing it, here: gopetition.com/…xists-end-all-lockdownsmaskstraxvax-actions-2.html
In April StandUpX committee member Dr. Kevin Corbett MSc PhD (@KPCResearch on Twitter) published a paper describing issues around the non-isolation of the theoretical SARS-COV-2 virus. Below is a screenshot from his paper entitled “WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE ‘NOVEL CORONAVIRUS’, ‘SARS-CoV-2’, AND THE ACCURACY OF THE TESTS?”, which you may access here:
kevinpcorbett.com/…CE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE CORONAVIRUS FINAL2.pdf
Update November 1, 2020: Marc Horn also queried Public Health England for records describing “SARS-COV-2 isolation” from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material. Response: no records. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/2020/11/PHE-FOI-reply-re-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf
Another “no records” FOI response from Public Health England dated November 3, 2020, in response to a request from Athanasios Kandias for records (re SARS-COV-2 isolation) held by the National Biological Standards Board.
whatdotheyknow.com/…/attach/2/1740 FOI NIBSC records on SARS COV 2.pdf (Preserved here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…1740-FOI-NIBSC-no-records-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf)
No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms says Public Health England, in response to a query from Marc Horn. Note that PHE cited 3 publicly available studies, none involving isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…SARS-COV-2-isolation-and-causation-of-COVID-19.pdf
September 7, 2021:
Public Health England failed once again to cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ontent/uploads/2021/09/PHE-Sept-7-2021-PACKAGE.pdf
September 20: Public Health England confirmed for Yvonne Hobbs that it does not hold any information re purification of any “COVID-19 virus” or “variants”.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…nt/uploads/2021/10/PH-England-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Public Health England confirmed that they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” (including “variants”) purification, by anyone, anywhere:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…alth-England-SARS-COV-2-v3-Redacted-2021-09-28.pdf
July 27, 2021: In England, the Pennine Acute National Health Service Trust and the Salford Royal National Health Service Foundation Trust disclosed in FOI responses:
• that they have in total zero records re “SARSCov2” satisfying Koch’s Postulates (and yes, we know that a strict application of Koch’s would not be possible, even if the imaginary “virus” actually existed; note that these institutions provided plenty of unrequested data but no records whatsoever re “virus” isolation/purification);
• PCR tests have been run with up to 42 cycles;
• <10 children died within 28 days of a positive convid test;
• “cause of death is not recorded in our clinical systems”. Full response:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-content/uploads/2021/07/NCA-FOI-11135-package.pdf
No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms , says the UK’s House of Lords, in response to a query from Marc Horn: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-House-of-Lords-FOI-reply-re-COVID19-causation.pdf
Britain’s Health and Safety Executive confirmed for Athanasios Kandias on November 3, 2020 that they hold no information relating to isolation of “SARS-COV-2”.
whatdotheyknow.com/request/documents_held_showing_sars_cov2_3
(Preserved here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…nt/uploads/2020/11/Health-and-Safety-Executive.pdf).
Here is an exasperating email exchange between myself and Imperial College London, home of the disgraced “COVID-19” modeller Professor Neil Ferguson and Public Health England’s Deputy Director of National Infection Service and Director of Reference Microbiology Services, British virologist, Professor Maria Zambon FMedSci FRCPath. The College clearly has no records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification but is unwilling to admit such:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…llege-London-FOI-exchange-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…f-Health-isolation-request-reply-w-translation.pdf
September 8, 2021: Spain’s Ministry of Health provided an uber-evasive response to an organization called Liberum, re isolation/purification, characterization, culturing etc. of the alleged COVID-19 virus. Here are the actual questions posed by Liberum (provided by a member), with an (automated) English translation, and the responses also with an (automated) English translation. The Ministry’s total evasion re purification, and their admission that they don’t even bother with bogus monkey cell cultures, speaks volumes:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ain-Ministry-of-Health-Liberum-request-PACKAGE.pdf
The Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Andrea Ammon, has admitted to having no documentation, even for the ECDC’s methodology to prove that a virus exists, let alone proof of SARS-COV-2: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ads/2020/11/DOCUMENT-REQUEST-ECDC-AND-RESPONSE.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-Slovenia-University-of-Ljubljana-re-isolation.pdf
And more recently still, Slovenia’s National Laboratory for Health, Environment & Food (Nacionalnega laboratorija za zdravje, okolje in hrano, NLZOH – “the central and largest Slovenian public health laboratory that handles environmental protection, diagnostic and public health microbiological activities, chemical and microbiological analyses of different types of samples, and also performs research activities“) failed to provide or cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification or proof of existence, despite an intervention by the Information Commissioner. NLZOH also cited a “business secret” in responses re queries re PCR testing.
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ds/2021/06/Slovenia-Lab-package-w-translations.pdf
July 9, 2021: Slovenia’s main medical centre – Univerzitetni klinični center Ljubljana, UKCLJ (University Medical Centre Ljubljana) – provides/cites zero records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification but nevertheless claims Koch’s Postulates are fulfilled, and cites typical “monkey business” papers:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…21/07/Slovenia-UKCLJ-request-response-redacted.pdf
fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/07/Argentina-no-aislamiento-del-sarscov.pdf
VIDEO: Admiten que no existe el coronavirus: Develan la gran farsa
canal7salta.com/…ue-no-existe-el-coronavirus-develan-la-gran-farsa/
Hall of Shame
On February 15, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted an FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the Basque Country (Spain) Office of the President and Department of Health and all dependent institutions. Months later Kepa wrote:
“According to the law, they have 30 days to respond; 60 if the question is especially complex. Today is May 2nd and I have not heard from them.”
“The CSIC and the Basque government are public institutions and, therefore, must comply with the Ley de transparencia, buen gobierno y acceso a la información pública/Law of transparency, good governance and access to public information. Article 20.4 of this law states that, if after 30 days there has been no response from the public administration, this silence is to be understood as meaning that the request to access the public information solicited has been refused.”
This collection of FOI responses is being kindly backed up by a friend, here: jumpshare.com/b/05F75HqalwFSRBB8Axsw
and they have backed up the compilation pdfs here:
Part 1
jumpshare.com/v/nQzGHoVRPyYXpVCcwz6M
Part 2
jumpshare.com/v/pTNmoQAnecXi6MFDaHDX
Part 3
jumpshare.com/v/X7PzQvlcyGRoEc5xLqZf
Part 4
jumpshare.com/v/iJnYR7h3gSiypUBvhF2c
And someone kindly made this easy-to-remember tiny URL for the FOI collection – it re-directs to the page you are currently on:
http://tinyurl.com/norecordfound
Would you like to help? FOI Template
If you would like to submit your own FOI request to another institution, or obtain an updated response from an institution that has already been FOI’d, here is a suggested template and some tips:
fluoridefreepeel.ca/template-for-foi-requests/.
Please share with me any responses that you receive!)
VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL, HAGA CLIC AQUÍ
So “What The Hell Is Going?
At this point you might be scratching your head and wonder what on Earth is going on. If so, the collection of resources on the page linked below will reveal the fraud behind the fake pandemic known as “COVID-19”, as explained by various experts. The focus here is on the isolation/purification issue, the fake “genomes” and meaningless PCR tests that are at the heart of it all.
And finally, some interviews and speeches of my own…
On November 26, 2020 at a protest in Toronto, I was given a spur-of-the-moment opportunity to deliver a message to the Canadian government re their handing of “COVID-19”, via the mainstream media. Enjoy:
facebook.com/667080161/posts/10164414770715162/
On November 28, 2020 I gave a speech at The Line Canada‘s anti-lockdown protest; it begins at the 19 minute mark in this video:
In early December 2020, Kevin J. Johnston invited me to discuss the FOI documents on his weekly podcast:
bitchute.com/video/ruvRPMZtSCTI//
In April 2021 I did a short impromptu interview with Lockdown Radio, at a protest in my new hometown of Peterborough Ontario (7 minutes, audio only):
youtube.com/watch?v=FHi1pofmCkQ
August 10, 2021: DOES THE ‘VIRUS’ EXIST? HAS SARS-COV-2 BEEN ISOLATED?
August 20, 2021: Atlantic Underground with Guests Patrick King and Christine Massey
odysee.com/…Atlantic-Undeerground-Podcast-Episode--64-zoom_0:9
Video: Thursday August 26 2021: My interview with Christopher James of A Warrior Calls
bitchute.com/video/u0Y75lQGlPvo/
Audio: October 1, 2021: The Worldwide Hunt for SARS-CoV-2: Christine Massey Interview about her Freedom of Information Law responses — Eric F. Coppolino of Planet Waves FM:
planetwaves.fm/worldwide-hunt-for-sars-cov-2/
Video: October 20, 2021: Christine Massey & Dr. Kevin Corbett discuss the missing proof of the existence of ‘SARS-CoV-2’ :
rumble.com/…e-for-the-existence-of-sars-cov-2-covid-virus.html
October 2021: Dr. Bill Smith and I joined Brian Lupo of Cann Con Community to discuss the isolation/purification issue, and the “covid” injections:
locals.com/…e-incredible-information-on-covid-and-the-vaccines
(Proton has banned me from sending any more emails, permanently, without any warning whatsoever.)
Twitter has “permanently” banned me!
So connect with me on FB: facebook.com/login/
Source: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ve-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
For more information: 1. Questioning the official account - 2. One year of Global Health Tyranny. - 3. Brutal Health Totalitarianism. - 4. Six months of Global Health Tyranny - 5. Pandemic and Simulation Games: Preparation for a New Era? - Paul Schreyer. - 6. The shocking truth about Covid19: Discover how superrich criminals hav… - 7. Proof that the pandemic was planned with a purpose. - 8. Gates health empire, Luciferase, and Patent WO-2020-060606 - 9. German Lawyer Reiner Fuellmich Sues The World Over Coronavirus. Patric… - 10. New Normal: Pandemic Police State. All of the politicians and medical … - 11. Freedom Alliance Ireland against Plandemic. Lockdowns Are Quietly Imp… - 12. COVIDLAND - EPISODE 1: THE LOCKDOWN - Covidland: The Lockdown is part … - 13. "MONOPOLY: WHO OWNS THE WORLD" - Stop World Control: stopworldcontrol.… - 14. "What they hide from us about covid vaccines" - Some say that if, afte… - 15. "THE VACCINE DEATH REPORT" - EVIDENCE OF MILLIONS OF DEATHS AND HUNDRE… - 16. PLANDEMIC 2 INDOCTORNATION - SPANISH SUBTITLES
Para más información: 1. "Dieciocho meses de Tiranía Sanitaria Mundial" - Miles Christi - 15/09… - 2. La triple mentira plandémica. - 3. Boletín informativo VII. - 4. La verdad sobre la "pandemia". - 5. "Cronología Target Covid-19" - Realizado por: Junta Argentina de Revis… - 6. Miles Christi 2020-2021: Una selección temática. - 7. "Estudio de la pandemia: análisis científico independiente" - Sergio P… - 8. Vacuna Covid: Crimen Contra la Humanidad. - 9. Lo que nos ocultan sobre las "vacunas" covid. Algunos dicen que si, de… - 10. Boletín informativo VIII. - 11. "El relato pandémico" - Nicolás Ponsiglione - Este es un libro muy rec… - 12. "INFORME DE MUERTES POR VACUNAS" - 13. PLANDEMIC 2 INDOCTORNATION - SPANISH SUBTITLES - 14. NO a la vacunación obligatoria.
Pour plus d'information: 1. Un an de Tyrannie Sanitaire Mondiale. - 2. Totalitarisme Sanitaire Brutal. - 3. Tyrannie Sanitaire Mondiale - 4. Radio-Québec - Nuremberg 2.0, les procès COVID commencent. - 5. L’étau se resserre sur la clique de Davos - 6. Le Docteur Louis Fouché explique pourquoi il ne se fera pas vacciner -… - 7. La fraude du test PCR et de la "pandémie" de covid - Dossier préparé par Germán Sarlangue. - 8. VACCINATION COVID-19, LE CRIME PARFAIT - 9. HOLD-UP - Retour sur un chaos - 2è version. - 10. MANIGANCE-19: La vidéo qui dénonce la grande manipulation COVID-19 - 11. Le "vaccin" covid, est-il sûr? Rien n'est moins sûr... - Voir aussi: 1… - 12. "PRIMUM NON NOCERE" - Suite du documentaire "HOLD UP" (1. HOLD-UP - Re… - 13. "30 faits que vous devez savoir : Une fiche d’information sur le COVID." - 14. La laïcité contre Dieu, l'Église et la France - 15. La doctrine de l’âme chez Saint Thomas d’Aquin - Miles Christi.