THE PANDEMIC GREAT DECEIT: THE COVID VIRUS HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED.
FOIs (safeopedia.com/definition/340/freedom-of-information-foi) reveal that health/science institutions around the world (138 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever. Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any alleged “virus”) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. (Can you spot the oxymoron in that quote?)
If you’re new to the topic of “virus isolation/purification”, I strongly recommend that you begin by reading the Statement On Virus Isolation by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Thomas Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell, MA: andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/ or watch this 5 minute video from Dr. Cowan. Or go here for many more resources, and corroborating evidence.
A colleague in New Zealand (Michael S.) and I (CM) and many other people around the world have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to institutions in various countries seeking records that describe the isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.
The reason: without the crucial step of isolation/purification having been performed (from many patients, followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged “novel coronavirus” (blamed for widespread death/disease/lockdown measures) actually exists.
Without this step having been performed and followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged “virus” are nothing but wild speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests and fraud-based diagnoses.
The requests submitted by Michael and I (and many of the other submitters) have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”) isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.
Every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
(And, to our knowledge, no one on the planet has ever purified the alleged “virus” even from a cell culture!)
September 27, 2021: Ontario’s Ministry of the Solicitor Generalripped up and mailed back my FOI application cheque, allegedly because “an original request was not included with the payment” – despite having already acknowledged my “original” FOI request that was sent via email to Ontario Provincial Police (which is currently being exposed for their participation in the global “covid” fraud). Hmm, what could be their motivation?
Click on the above links to access the responses from Canadian institutions. Scroll further down this page for responses from institutions outside of Canada.
Click here for compilation pdfs containing FOI responses from 127 institutions in >25 countries/jurisdictions (in somewhat CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER), re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”, as well as emails from authors of studies that claimed to have “isolated the virus” and an email from the Head of the Consultant Laboratory for Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Infectious Pathogens at Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (note: many of these responses were obtained by FOI-submitters other than Michael S. and myself, as indicated further down this page).
Check back here (the page you are currently on) for regular updates.
As of November 22, 2021: 138 institutions and offices in over 25 countrieshave responded thus far, as well as some “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study authors, and none have provided or cited any record describing actual “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification.
Numerous institutions have also made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
The list shown below was current as of October 5, 2021.
Note that some institutions failed to fully co-operate. Tsk tsk University of Auckland, Public Health Wales, Imperial College London.
(And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science. And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the Methods used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19”.)
Notes:
Anyone is welcome to post these documents on other sites. I would only ask that they also refer people to this particular webpage because this is where all the new responses get added, so it’s the place to go for the most recent and complete collection of FOIs.
Donations to support this work are greatly needed and appreciated! See bottom of this page for details.
FOI responses from institutions in the U.S., India, Republic of South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Colombia, Uruguay, Italy, Portugal, Brazil, Republic of Colombia, Ilse of Man, Phillipines, etc., plus emails from Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (RKI) and several “virus isolation authors”.
A big Thank You to all the individuals who have now kindly shared additional responses that they obtained re isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”. Some prefer to remain anonymous, others are named below.
[Also note that we have a collection of responses from the U.S. CDC, Public Health Agency of Canada, New Zealand Ministry of Health, etc. in regards to isolation/purification of a number of other alleged “viruses”, i.e. “HIV”, “measles virus”, “polio virus”, “HPV”, “Ebola virus”, “Zika virus”, “XMRV”, “HTLV1”, “HTLV-III/LAV”, 2003 “SARS-COV”, “MERS virus”, any common cold “coronavirus”, “Marburg virus” any “virus” on their “immunization” schedules. Again, none have yielded any records or citations of records describing the isolation/purification of any “virus” from a patient sample. Click here to see those responses: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ng-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/]
As this next link you will see a “no records of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification” FOI response from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), dated November 2, 2020: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…0/11/USA-CDC-Virus-Isolation-Response-Scrubbed.pdf
On March 1, 2021 once again the CDC made clear to Michael S. that they still have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever… just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation of “SARS-COV-2” would require the replication of a “virus” without host cells and thus is impossible. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-1-2021-SARS-COV-2-Isolation-Response-Redacted.pdf
March 3, 2021: CDC again failed to provide/cite any records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification by anyone anywhere ever… BUT would no longer simply say so (as they did back on November 2nd); instead they gave Michael S. some song and dance and cited their own fraudulent study (by Harcourt et al.): fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ch-3-2021-SARS-COV-2-purification-FOI-response.pdf
September 8, 2021: Another FOIA response from the CDC re purification of the phantom “SARS-COV-2”. This time, CDC cited a paper wherein the authors never even claimed to have purified any “virus” themselves, and instead falsely stated that: “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated in Vero cells … (8)” [oxymoron]. [CDC’s reference #8 is the infamous Harcourt et al. study.] fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ontent/uploads/2021/09/Sept-8-2021-CDC-package.pdf
[Note that someone kindly forwarded another FOI response from the CDC dated December 30, 2020 re the alleged 2003 “SARS-COV-1” and all “common cold coronaviruses” – the CDC has no record of any having been isolated. Here is a temporary pdf of the redacted letter…. a better pdf one will follow: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…020/12/CDC-isolation-FOI-reply-any-coronavirus.pdf
September 3, 2021: Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) / National Institutes of Health, in response to a request for records that demonstrate that NIAID or NIH has a physical sample of purified “SARS-CoV-2”: – conflates isolation/purification with growth of the imaginary virus in cell culture, – provides irrelevant, distracting comments re Koch’s Postulates, – cites useless, irrelevant studies and webpages, and fabricated computer “genomes”, and -confirms that virology isn’t a science. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-content/uploads/2021/09/NIAID-NIH-Sept-3-2021.pdf
August 19, 2021: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services cited useless, irrelevant studies and webpages, and fabricated computer “genomes” in response to an FOIA request for “Records that demonstrates the US Department of Health and Human Services has a physical sample of the isolated and purified SARS-CoV-2 virus…” fluoridefreepeel.ca/…US-Health-and-Human-Services-response-redacted.pdf
June 24, 2021 FOIA response: Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) failed to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample by anyone, anywhere. NIAID referred me to the anti-science CDC study by Harcourt et al., even after I’d advised them of CDC’s June 7, 2021 ‘no records’ response. I have appealed to NIAID’s FOIA Public Liaison. The communications between myself and NIAID are provided here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…nt/uploads/2021/06/NIAID-FOIA-package-redacted.pdf
The CDC study cited by NIAID did not purify anything from a patient sample. It is the same study that Dr. Thomas Cowan wrote about in 2020 (“Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’“) where he also addressed the fraudulent nature of the authors’ fabricated “SARS-COV-2 genome” (as shown in the screenshot below).
Previously, in 2020, Ron Bublitz had already asked the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) the question shown below. His correspondence is posted at the following link, along with the evasive response provided by the NIH/NIAID Section Chief for Controlled Correspondence and Public Inquiries, Legislative Affairs and Correspondence Management Branch. linkedin.com/pulse/has-causation-been-proven-ron-bublitz/ Here is a pdf showing the text and a photo of the actual emails: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…D-reply-to-Ron-Bublitz-re-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf
Ron kindly provided a screenshot of his communications with NIAID, shown below.
Note that NIH/NIAID failed to answer any of Ron Bublitz’s questions and merely cited the same CDC study by Harcourt et al. mentioned above that indulged in the typical fraudulent “monkey business” approach to so-called “isolation” – as shown in the screenshot below).
Peterborough Public Health and (outgoing) Medical Officer Dr. Rosana Salvaterra confirm they have no records describing purification of the alleged “SARS-COV-2”, “HIV” aka “human immunodeficiency virus”, “Hep B virus” or “Hep C virus” from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. Which means they have zero proof of their existence. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…h-PH-HIV-Hep-B-Hep-C-SARSCOV2-package-redacted.pdf
October 23, 2021: The Assistant General Counsel at Clemson University, South Carolina confirmed for the requester that the University does not have any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, despite their Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences recently receiving $900,000 to study the alleged “virus”: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…n-University-2021-10-23-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
September 24, 2021: Wisconsin Governor and Department of Health Services confirmed for Charles R. Haeuser that they have no record regarding isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” (or regarding safety and/or approval of so-called “vaccines”). (The DHS did provide attachments regarding Wisconsin’s “COVID-19 Community Outreach Grant”; click here to see or download them.) fluoridefreepeel.ca/…r-and-Dept-of-Health-Services-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 29, 2021: Metro Public Health Department, Nashville, Tennessee advised that “No such record(s) exists, or this office does not maintain record(s) responsive to” a request from Irucka Embry re purification of the alleged “SARS-COV-2” or the complete matching of “virus genomic sequences” from victims of the alleged virus in Metro Nashville and Wuhan, China. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…Metro-PHD-Nashville-Tennessee-redacted-PACKAGE.pdf
August 18, 2021: Arizona Department of Health Services confirmed for Timothy Martin that they have no record describing isolation/purification of any “SARS-COV-2” from any patient sample on the planet, and confuse such with private/protected/identifiable healthcare data:fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/10/Arizona-Dept-Health-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 20: Florida Department of Health provided irrelevant, fraud-based PCR documentation and a major run-around in response to Beatrice Biddle’s request for records describing purification of the theoretical “COVID-19 virus”… rather than simply admit “we have no records”. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…21/10/Florida-Dept-Health-etc-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 17, 2021: Lithuania’s National Public Health Care Laboratory provided Arturas Bartasius with useless PCR documents and confirmed that “isolation of SARS-CoV-2 virus in cell cultures [oxymoron!], electron microscopy and virus purification (filtration, ultracentrifugation, chromatography) NVSPL is not performed“. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…BLIC-HEALTH-CARE-LABORATORY-PACKAGE-unredacted.pdf
2021 (Jan. 9 or Sept. 1, I’m not sure which): Serbia’s Ministry of Health told the ASSOCIATION OF “PARENTS OF MISSING BABIES OF SERBIA” that they have no records re isolation of the alleged/imaginary COVID-19 virus, or any of the other requested info. English translation and signed affidavit included: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…istry-of-Health-WITH-AFFIDAVIT-AND-TRANSLATION.pdf
May & August 2021: Oregon Health & Science University failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing purification of the alleged COVID-19 virus (aka “SARS-COV-2”) from any patient sample, by anyone on the planet, for the requester. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…t/uploads/2021/09/Oregon-OHSU-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
June 21, 2021. Via Dr. Fabio Franchi, author of “COVID-19. The catastrophe caused by the virus that is not there“, Dr. Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Director of Virology, Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani (National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani), Italy failed to provide or cite even 1 record re purification of the alleged COVID-19 virus aka “SARS-COV-2”.
FOI response and Dr. Franchi’s reply (including attachments) is here, with English translations:
October 29, 2021? Italy’s Ministry of Health failed to provide or cite any study or report (evidence) (or webpage citing such) re the isolation/purification of the alleged Sars-Cov-2 virus or any alleged variant, for the requester: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…1/11/Italy-Ministry-of-Health-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 31, 2021: The Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Department of Health, Phillipines. Article and FOI response: CCH FOI Bombshell: DOH Admits No Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Isolated. Yet Government Locked Down Nation Due to Virus No Country Has Yet Proven to Exist. covidcalltohumanity.org/…n-due-to-virus-no-country-has-yet-proven-to-exist/ FOI response backed up here:
August 2021: Massachusetts Department of Health Reports “No Responsive Documents” to FOIA Request for Information on Purified Isolate of Professed SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 Virus & Delta Variant Forming Basis for all State COVID Restrictions — by Ramola Dharmaraj:everydayconcerned.net/…ovid-19-virus-delta-variant-forming-basis-for-all/
The Massachusetts responses in the above article are also backed-up at the following links: August 11, 2021 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the Governor told Ramola Dharmaraj “we have no records” re isolation of (the alleged) SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 virus:
September 2, 2021: The Commonwealth of Virginia Department of General Services provided allegedly responsive records that contained zero descriptions of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. The allegedly (but not really) responsive records are 1): the CDC’s 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, and 2) ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 Combo Kit Procedure for the Detection of 2019-nCoV RNA by RTPCR. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…inia-Dept-of-General-Services-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 13, 2021: The General Counsel and FOI Officer for the Washington DC Department of Health confirmed for the requester that the Department has no record describing the purification of any “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”, including any alleged “variants” i.e. “B.1.1.7”, “B.1.351”, “P.1”) directly from a patient sample. Full communication: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…H_DC_-FOIA_001_RFI_08_11_2021-redacted-package.pdf
August 2021: Michigan Department of Health and Human Services confirmed for Andrew Nihem that they have no record describing purification of “the virus” (including any alleged “variants”) from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…igan-Dept-of-Health-and-Human-Services-package.pdf
August 18, 2021: California’s Department of Public Health confirmed for Kim Leonoudakis that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) having been purified from any patient sample on the planet and no analysis whatsoever re the alleged “Delta variant”:
August 24, 2021: California’s Department of Public Health confirmed for Robin that they have no record of “the virus” (including any “variants”) having been purified from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…nia-Dept-Public-Health-P013542-081421-redacted.pdf
August 9, 2021: The Arkansas Department of Health‘s Deputy General Counsel advised Dr. James W. Smith that the Department has no record describing the purification of any “SARS-COV-2” (including any scariants) from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, ever, via filtration and ultra-centrifugation. He did however provide 2 emails re “looking for COVID 19 in wastewater” – lol. Dr. Smith will be following up to request that the response be provided in a formal, signed and dated letter with a file number. Full correspondence: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ealth-no-records-email-response-Aug-9-redacted.pdf
After a series of Freedom of Information requests beginning in April 2020 failed to yield any satisfactory response, Ricardo Maarman (working alongside Dr. Faiez Kirsten) challenged the South African government in the Western Cape High Court in May 2021 to provide proof of “the virus” that allegedly justifies that government’s devastating lockdown measures.
(More specifically, Ricardo challenged the President, the National Department of Health, the Governmental COVID-19 Advisory Committee and the Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs. And the responding affidavit was authored primarily by the Acting Executive Director of South Africa’s National Institute for Communicable Diseases.)
The government failed to provide proof or even compelling evidence, and on pages 29+ of their responding affidavit (starting on page 31 of the pdf) revealed that they have relied on a “well established” but unscientific approach to “virus isolation”.
The SA government’s affidavit artfully implies that Koch’s Postulates (or a variation therefore) have been fulfilled for the alleged “virus” when in fact none of them have been. It contains no mention of purification of the particles that have been shown in EM images (within cell cultures, never purified or in patient samples!) alleged to be “the virus”, or the characterization or sequencing of purified particles, or any controlled experiment involving purified particles.
And the SA government’s discussion of the Bradford-Hill criteria glosses over the fact that these criteria presuppose the existence and valid measurement of the potentially causative factor under investigation, when the reality is that no test ever has been or could have been validated for the never-purified, never-characterized, never-sequenced particles alleged to be “the virus”.
The judge ruled that the matter is not urgent and struck the matter from her roll. Ricardo will be pursuing this further. The notice of motion, hearing transcript, court ruling, other documentation and interviews about this case are posted on a dedicated website: showusthevirus.info.
A Lisbon court document dated May 19, 2021 is posted on the website of Andre Dias, PhD (as reported by Celia Farber at “The Truth Barrier,” celiafarber.substack.com).
According to Ms. Farber’s published June 28, 2021 email interview with Dias, who is an expert in lung disease modeling, the court ruling is in regards to a citizen’s petition to the Ministry of Health, “equivalent to a Freedom of Information Request…that ended up in court – with epidemiological and statistical queries“, and “the court also formalized that the ministry has no data or references about the existence of the virus…”
Ms. Farber advises that an English translation of the court ruling is in the works and will be shared on her website once it’s prepared. Below is a screenshot from the original document showing some of the questions that had been posed to Portugal’s Ministry of Health, for which they apparently had no answers.
July 2021: Brazil’s Ministry of Health provided/cited zero records of “SARS-COV-2” purification for the FOI submitter, Marcella Picone. The Ministry initially claimed that the request (that the rest of world understood just fine) was unclear, but also admitted “information non-existent”. In their 2nd response to Ms. Picone they explained that they have been following research conducted by other countries. See ps 2, 13, 14. Full responses: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…oads/2021/07/Brazil-Ministry-of-Health-package.pdf
The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) is an FDA-like quackcine-approver. In their FOI response to Marcella Picone, they explained that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and are not required to by law, thus it is (in their minds) not their obligation to make sure that “the virus” actually exists. Full communication: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-content/uploads/2021/07/Brazil-ANVISA-package.pdf
At the next link (from the website of award-winning investigate journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and co-author of the book Virus Mania) is an email from Dr. Michael Laue, Head of the Consultant Laboratory for Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Infectious Pathogens at Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (RKI), an institute “within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health” and responsible for disease control and prevention: torstenengelbrecht.com/…p-content/uploads/RKI_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf
The starting point for this paper is a so-called SARS-COV-2 isolate named “MUC-IMB1” (referred to simply as “MUC-1” in the paper’s supporting materials). Turonova et al. credit G. Dobler of the Bundeswehr Institute for Microbiology for providing them this “isolate”.
I contacted Dr. Gerhard Dobler to confirm details about “MUC-1” (which goes by several different names including Germany/BavPat1/2020), and it turns out that MUC-1 is another result of the monkey-business methodology cited at the top of this page. (The emails and more details are posted here: MUC-1 aka MUC-IMB1: just more Corman/Drosten monkey business fraud.) MUC-1 is not isolated/purified “virus” nor was it ever shown to contain any “virus”.
Also on Torsten Engelbrecht’s website are links to email responses from authors of “SARS-COV-2” studies, starting with the Zhu et al paper cited above by Dr. Michael Laue. None provided any evidence or assurance re purification of “the virus”. The following is copied and pasted from Torsten’s homepage:
“Na Zhu et al. (NEJM): “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones” (see Email).
Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris (Nature Medicine): “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus” (see Email).
Sharon R. Lewin et al. (The Medical Journal of Australia): ““The nucleic acid extraction was performed on isolate material recovered from infected cells. This material was not centrifuged, so was not purified through sucrose gradient to have a density band as such. The EM images were obtained directly from cell culture material” (see Email).
Myung-Guk Han et al. (Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives): “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells” (see Email).
Wan Beom Park et al. (Journal of Korean Medical Science): “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see Email).”
January 13, 2021: Norway’s Ministry of Health and Care Services failed to provide or cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation from a sample from a symptomatic patient, where the sample was not adulterated with additional genetic material, by anyone anywhere, for the requester Martiens Bekker. Request and response with English translation: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/06/Norway-Ministry-of-Health-cites-no-records.pdf
April 25, 2021: the Norwegian Directorate of Health (which is under the Ministry of Health and Care Services) failed to provide or cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, and provided a silly excuse instead: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ploads/2021/06/Norwegian-Directorate-of-Health.pdf
May, 2021 Uruguay’s Clemente Stable Biological Research Institute (under the Ministry of Education and Culture) and the Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Republic provided/cited no records of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone anywhere, for requester María Bettina Galo. Both responses: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-Culture-Faculty-of-Chem-U-of-Repub-no-records.pdf
June 7 2021: Uruguay Ministry of Public Health failed to provide or cite for requester María Bettina Galo any record of “SARS-COV-2” purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, ever and claimed they can’t understand the request: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…guay-Ministry-of-Public-Health-of-Res-377-2021.pdf
Once again, Uruguay Ministry of Public Health was queried by María Bettina Galo re “SARS-COV-2” purification. The answer: “We are not aware that SARS COV 2 has been cultivated“… even though Bettina hadn’t asked about “cultivation”, which is the opposite of purifying anything. See page 20: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…FECTOS-ADVERSOS-DOCUMENTO_Maria-Bettina-Galo-1.pdf
May 3, 2021: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR, “the apex body in India for formulation, coordination & promotion of biomedical research”) has failed to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification for the requester (who asked to keep both their name and file # private); instead they cited a typical example of “monkey-business” fraud – exactly what the requester had asked not to receive.
Note that ICRM has fraudulently claimed to have isolated “the virus” and the imaginary UK scariant, to have been tracking “the virus” across India, has developed a COVID-19 quackcine, shares ownership rights on the quackcine and is a member of guess WHO’s Global Health Workforce Network.
The 1 record cited by ICMR is a correspondence entitled “First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India” published in the Indian Journal of Medical Research which is a journal published for the ICRM. According to the correspondence “The designated COVID-19 testing laboratories …referred the specimens …to the Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology (ICMR-NIV), Pune, after screening for envelope (E) gene by realtime RT-PCR was done.” Three of of co-the authors are affiliated with ICRM.
Yash, the requester for the above FOI to ICMR, then appealed the ICMR’s response, pointing out that the study cited by ICMR was exactly what he had specified he was not requesting (because it has nothing to do with isolating/purifying an alleged “virus”). The July 12, 2021 response to his appeal: “The reply provided to the applicant is in order and satisfactory.” Yash’s appeal and response: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…tent/uploads/2021/08/ICMR-first-APPEAL-package.pdf
June 28, 2021, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) once again fails to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and cites more “monkey-business” fraud, this time through their National Institute of Virology. Note the World Health Organization logo and reference in the footer of the letter. Here is the URL for the image: fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/India-ICMR.jpeg
Next is a 2nd FOI response of June 28 2021 from the Indian Council of Medical Research failing again to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and citing the same anti-science papers, this time in response to requester Trinayan Das. ICMR was also asked additional questions re PCR, and responded that it is the “gold standard” for detection (“very accurately”! “confirms the presence”!!). Full response: fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ICMR-June-28-2.pdf
September 14, 2021: Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Ústav organické chemie a biochemie AV ČR, v. v. i. (Prague) advised that they have never purified the alleged COVID-19 virus from any patient sample, but convinced themselves they had a sample of “it” by fabricating a “genome” from RNA sequences found in their monkey cell culture.fluoridefreepeel.ca/…loads/2021/10/Czech-UOCHB-FOI-ANSWER-14.9.2021.pdf
I personally cannot read these Czech documents, but was told: Univerzita Karlova:“This from the No.1 university in Czech R. As answer, they inform us, that “there is broad consensus in the international scientific community” about precise RNA sequence of SARS-Cov2, about its chemical and protein structure and it causing COVID19.” Thus Univerzita Karlova failed to provide any record proving the purification or existence of “the virus”: fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Czech-university.pdf
Czech Ministry of Health:“This is the response of Czech ministry of health. When a proof of existence of the SARS-Cov2 virus was requested…” The references cited by the Ministry are in English and do not describe purification of an alleged virus, let alone scientific study of such. Full letter: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ntent/uploads/2021/05/Czech-ministry-of-health.pdf
I personally cannot read this next document from the Ukraine’s Ministry of Health dated March 15, 2021, but am told that the Ministry stated here that they do not have any “SARS-COV-2” isolate, nor do they intend to obtain any.
The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (the Netherlands) provided/cited for the requester no records of actual purification and control experiments to show “SARS-CoV-2” exists: fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FOI-RIVM2.pdf
August 24, 2021: Sweden’s Public Health Authority also can’t find “the virus”. John Blaid submitted a formal FOI request to for records describing purification of “the virus” from any patient sample (not adulterated with genetic material, i.e. monkey cells, fetal bovine serum) on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. The response: “No, no such documents exist.” Full correspondence: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/Sweden-Public-Health-Authority-FHM-2021-08-24.pdf
October 18, 2021: Sweden’s Karolinska Institute was unable to provide or cite any record of SARS-CoV-2 isolation/purification for John Blaid. According to John: “This is the answer they gave me translated from Swedish:
“Hello John! The registrar and the communications department at Karolinska Institute have now replied that they do not have access to this information.At present, the university library does not have the opportunity to perform search assignments for external customers. One suggestion is to do a search in the freely available database PubMed. If you have the opportunity to visit us, you can also use other databases. ki.se/om-kib/kontakt-oppettider PubMed contains the MeSH term SARS-CoV-2 / isolation and purification, which currently provides 5251 references.nih.gov/?term="SARS-CoV-2/isolation+and+purification"&sort.””
April 26, 2021: Once again the Dutch Minister for Health, Well-being & Sport (the Netherlands) replied to an FOI sent to its agency RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) re purification of “the virus”; the Minister provided/cited zero such records for Gabriëlle Rutten, and cited cell culture anti-science instead. Full correspondence: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…uploads/2021/07/Wob-verzoek-no-records-package.pdf
Feb 18, 2021: The Isle of Man’s Department of Health and Social Care admitted in a FOI response to Mr. Steven Gardner that: – “the virus” is not isolated/purified; – 45 PCR cycles! and gave false info re sequences used in PCR “tests”. Full unredacted pdf: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ntent/uploads/2021/07/Isle-of-Man-FOI-response.pdf
August 23, 2021: Once again New Zealand‘s Ministry of Health confirmed for Michael S. that neither they nor New Zealand’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), have any record of the phantom “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) purified from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…iants-Purification-Request-Response-Redacted-1.pdf
August 26, 2021: Once again New Zealand‘s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), confirms they have no record of the phantom “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) purified from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere:
Here are 5 pages of pure gold, evidencing masterful evasion plus stunning incompetence and/or fraud from New Zealand’s Ministry of Health. Instead of providing the requests records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification and proof of accurate diagnostic tests, they blathered about genomes and cultures of the never-isolated imaginary virus; stated that PCR tests have been validated around the world and are the gold standard; and cited a February 2020 preliminary report (“The Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 Transgenic Mice”) that used the so-called “SARS-COV-2” strain that had been concocted by Zhu et al. and claimed that Koch’s Postulates had been fulfilled. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…loads/2021/01/NZ-Min-Health-2nd-FOI-no-records.pdf
March 22, 2021, New Zealand’s Ministry of Heath confirms they still have no record describing purification of “the virus” and hence zero proof of its existence, and they choose to cite fraudulent studies instead (the infamous Harcourt et al. study mentioned above and the Australian paper cited at the top of this page). Full pdf response: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-03-22-NZ-MOH-Purification-SARS-COV-2-redacted.pdf
April 19, 2021, responding to a request that had been forwarded to them by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern‘s Office, the New Zealand Ministry of Heath confirms that no record describing purification of “SARS-COV-2” is held by the Ministry or by any “agency subject to the Act”. Full pdf response: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…Purification-SARS-COV-2-Final-Request-Redacted.pdf
New Zealand’s University of Auckland was disappointingly non-cooperative, the only institution as of October 8th failing to simply admit that they have no such records, opting instead for a sketchy “refusal” of my colleague’s request. Let’s face it, if the University actually had any such records (that no one else on the planet appears have) and they are publicly available, the University of Auckland would have proudly provided links/citations. But they didn’t. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…t/uploads/2020/10/Auckland-redacted-FOI-emails.pdf
September 22, 2021: New Zealand’s University of Otago, where researchers claimed last year ago to have “isolated the virus”, confirmed once again they actually have no record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification, by anyone, anywhere: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-30-University-of-Otago-SARS-COV-2-v3-Redacted.pdf
October 13, 2021: New Zealand’s University of Waikato confirmed for the requester that they have no record describing purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” (or “variants”) from any patient sample on the planet: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…y-of-Waikato-2021-10-13-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
June 16, 2021: University of Western Australia – home of Gates-funded researcher Christine Carson, who has spent countless hours on social media this past year insisting “yes the COVID-19 virus has been isolated” – provided/cited zero records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification from a patient sample, by anyone anywhere ever:
September 27, 2021: Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”), which is involved in “COVID-19” vaccine trials using the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” from Doherty Institute, confirmed that they still have no record of “SARS-COV-2” (including “variants”) purification, by anyone, anywhere: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…021/09/2021-09-27-CSIRO-SARS-COV-2-v3-Redacted.pdf
The next FOI letter shown in the screenshot below is in response to a request that was submitted on the advice of Australia’s Department of Health, and has come to us via John Blaid. Addressed to Mary-Jane Liddicoat, the formal but undated letter was authored sometime after March 9, 2021 by Dr. Nick Coatsworth, Executive Director of Medical Services, Canberra Health Services (CHS), ACT Government (Government of the Australian Capital Territory).
[When reviewing Coatsworth’s response, bear in mind the following facts provided us by Darren Christison, a journalist in Sydney, Australia: “This is the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who is the ‘poster boy’ for the Australian government’s push to vaccinate everyone until they urinate the poison, and has been a permanent fixture on TV and online in recent months (youtube.com/watch?v=Aep_RKawTWc). He’s also the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who recently, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, ‘admonished a “hardcore rump of activist doctors” spreading misinformation and undermining vaccine confidence” (smh.com.au/…re-for-the-return-of-covid-19-20210514-p57s1u.html).]
March 19, 2021: Australian Capital Territory / Canberra Health Services once again failed to provide / cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (thus demonstrating that they still have zero proof that “the virus” actually exists). Full communications: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…CT-Canberra-Health-Services-no-records-package.pdf
Mar 16 2021: Western Australia Minister & Department of Health confirm they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (and thus zero proof that “the virus” exists), and that PathWest Laboratory Medicine only does the quackery version of “virus isolation”. Full communications: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/07/Western-Australia-no-records-package.pdf
April 28, 2021: South Australia Minister for Health and Wellbeing confirmed they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (and thus zero proof that “the virus” actually exists). Full communications: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ads/2021/07/South-Australia-package-no-records.pdf
May 25, 2021: New South Wales Ministry of Health, Australia, confirmed they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (and thus zero proof that “the virus” actually exists). Full communications: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ent/uploads/2021/07/NSW-no-records-May-25-2021.pdf
October 27, 2021: The UK’s new euphemistically-named Health Security Agency confirmed that they have no records re isolation/purification of the alleged COVID-19 virus. The requester wrote back with a lovely response: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…oads/2021/11/UKHSA-2021-10-27-Replies-redacted.pdf
[Note The U.K. Department of Health and Social Care has kept us waiting for 2 months already on an FOI request for (at most) 3 days worth of analysis on their alleged “new variant” announced by Matt Hancock on December 14 2020: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…DHSC-handling-of-Dec14-FOI-re-socalled-variant.pdf]
September 20, 2021: UK’s Government Office for Science confirmed once again “we do not hold the information you have requested”, re “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) isolation/purification, by anyone, anywhere:
Here is a sketchy FOI reply from the U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (obtained by Mr. Athanasios Kandias). The agency provided/cited no records re “SARS-COV-2” isolation. Their response includes an (apparently fraudulent) claim that such records are available in the public domain, but they provided zero links/citations despite having been asked for the location of any such records. Excerpts are shown below. Full response: whatdotheyknow.com/request/documents_held_showing_sars_cov2_2 Pdf: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…roducts-Regulatory-Agency-no-isolation-records.pdf
Regarding “BNT162b2”, the mRNA ingredient in the Pfizer-BioNTech “Covid-19 vaccine”, that is allegedly transcribed from the the alleged corresponding genetic template that allegedly encodes the alleged viral spike (S) protein of the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus”, U.K. Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency admitted to investigative journalist Frances Leader that: the genetic template on which it (“BNT162b2”) is based “does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person“, rather it “was generated via a combination of gene synthesis and recombinant DNA technology“. The email exchange is available here:
October 30, 2021: Suffolk County Council in England confirmed for Yvonne Hobbs that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone on the planet, and no records proving a causal link between the imaginary virus and (PCR results packaged as) “covid-19”. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…021/11/Suffolk-County-Council-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 20, 2021: Public Health London Hammersmith and Fulham in the UK confirmed for the requester that they have no record of any “COVID-19 virus/variant” purified from any patient sample by anyone, anywhere on the planet, and no record proving a causal link between the alleged virus and “COVID-19” – and thus zero evidence of “its” existence: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…London-Hammersmith-and-Fulham-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 10, 2021: Public Health Scotland confirmed once again, this time for Richard Anthony, that they have no purified sample of the alleged “COVID=19 virus/variants” and know of no one in Scotland who does, and they equated isolation/purification with meaningless, unscientific monkey cell culturing. Pdf: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…/uploads/2021/10/Scotland-PH-FOI-2021-000848-2.pdf
Here is a 2nd & more recent dodgy response from Public Health Wales yielding no record, or citation of any record, of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification done by anyone, anywhere, ever. fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/PHWales.pdf
Statens Serum Institut, Denmark told Alex Holmsted that (translation): “The Statens Serum Institut can state that we have now carried out a journal search for documentation that has convinced the Statens Serum Institut about the real existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged cause of COVID19 and moreover, we have in some other way tried to locate relevant documents. Statens Serum Institut can note that we are not in possession of the requested documents...”fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ply-Afgoerelse_Alex_Holmstedt_SAG_20-08162__1_.pdf
Related video: Denmark health officials became indignant and defensive during a press conference when asked by journalist Kristofer Krarup about the FOI responses from their own institutions indicating they have zero proof of “the virus”: bitchute.com/video/AiwB5h4VCnTH/
Months ago, the StandUpX Science Committee published an open letter dated June 22, 2020 to the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Below is a screenshot from their letter, demanding scientific proof of the alleged “COVID-19 virus”. (Their entire letter can be viewed and/or downloaded here: kevinpcorbett.com/onewebmedia/Signed StandUpX definitive.pdf)
StandUpX Committee member Piers Corbyn also made the demand verbally outside the headquarters of the UK government; video footage of the demand is available at this url (not the embedded video below – that is a different video featuring Peirs Corbyn; WordPress would not embed the footage of the demand for some reason, so please click on this url to see the demand, not on the image below):youtube.com/null
Below is footage of Piers Corbyn calling out the UK government for the non-isolation of their theoretical “SARS-COV-2 virus”. bitchute.com/video/1eDDh3eqFPAJ/ ERRATUM: In the description underneath the video (on the bitchute page) the authors of the publication on the Drosten PCR test are referred to has ‘Drosten et al’ when it should read ‘Croman et al’.
StandUpX has a petition entitled “If there’s no proof the virus exists end all Lockdowns/Masks/Trax/Vax actions“. If you can tell the difference between isolation and fraudulent monkey business, please consider signing it, here:gopetition.com/…xists-end-all-lockdownsmaskstraxvax-actions-2.html
In April StandUpX committee member Dr. Kevin Corbett MSc PhD (@KPCResearch on Twitter) published a paper describing issues around the non-isolation of the theoretical SARS-COV-2 virus. Below is a screenshot from his paper entitled “WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE ‘NOVEL CORONAVIRUS’, ‘SARS-CoV-2’, AND THE ACCURACY OF THE TESTS?”, which you may access here: kevinpcorbett.com/…CE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE CORONAVIRUS FINAL2.pdf
Guess “WHO” advised Public Health England (and the rest of the world) not to isolate “the virus” as a routine diagnostic procedure, and “WHO” encourages the conflation of isolation with culturing? See the screenshots below from page 4 of the Interim Guidance document dated March 2, 2020 “Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases” kindly provided by Dr. Corbett of StandUpX: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ads/2020/11/WHO-COVID-19-laboratory-2020.4-eng.pdf and page 8 of the Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 Interim guidance 11 September 2020canucklaw.ca/…9-nCoV-laboratory-September-11-2020-Guidelines.pdf
Update, October 1, 2020: My colleague in New Zealand recently received a “no records” response from Public Health England – identical to the “no records” response above that was already provided to Andrew Johnson. You may access this 2nd response from PHE here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…uploads/2020/10/Public-Health-England-scrubbed.pdf
No records supporting the claim that the alleged “SARS-COV-2 virus” causes “COVID-19” symptoms says Public Health England, in response to a query from Marc Horn. Note that PHE cited 3 publicly available studies, none involving isolation of “SARS-COV-2” from a sample not unadulterated with additional genetic material. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…SARS-COV-2-isolation-and-causation-of-COVID-19.pdf
July 27, 2021: In England, the Pennine Acute National Health Service Trust and the Salford Royal National Health Service Foundation Trust disclosed in FOI responses: • that they have in total zero records re “SARSCov2” satisfying Koch’s Postulates (and yes, we know that a strict application of Koch’s would not be possible, even if the imaginary “virus” actually existed; note that these institutions provided plenty of unrequested data but no records whatsoever re “virus” isolation/purification); • PCR tests have been run with up to 42 cycles; • <10 children died within 28 days of a positive convid test; • “cause of death is not recorded in our clinical systems”. Full response: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-content/uploads/2021/07/NCA-FOI-11135-package.pdf
Here is an exasperating email exchange between myself and Imperial College London, home of the disgraced “COVID-19” modeller Professor Neil Ferguson and Public Health England’s Deputy Director of National Infection Service and Director of Reference Microbiology Services, British virologist, Professor Maria Zambon FMedSci FRCPath. The College clearly has no records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification but is unwilling to admit such: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…llege-London-FOI-exchange-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf
Kepa Ormazabal submitted a Freedom of Information request to Spain’s Ministry of Health for bibliographic records of studies describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification (“the term “isolation” is used in the sense given by the Real Academia Espanola Dictionary”); the Ministry’s response yielded no records: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…f-Health-isolation-request-reply-w-translation.pdf
September 8, 2021: Spain’s Ministry of Health provided an uber-evasive response to an organization called Liberum, re isolation/purification, characterization, culturing etc. of the alleged COVID-19 virus. Here are the actual questions posed by Liberum (provided by a member), with an (automated) English translation, and the responses also with an (automated) English translation. The Ministry’s total evasion re purification, and their admission that they don’t even bother with bogus monkey cell cultures, speaks volumes: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ain-Ministry-of-Health-Liberum-request-PACKAGE.pdf
September 15, 2021: here is a report from Spain discussing an apparent class action lawsuit demanding proof of “the virus, in the form of a sample to be subjected to independent verification:digitalwarriors.uk/great-news-out-of-spain/
The Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Andrea Ammon, has admitted to having no documentation, even for the ECDC’s methodology to prove that a virus exists, let alone proof of SARS-COV-2: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ads/2020/11/DOCUMENT-REQUEST-ECDC-AND-RESPONSE.pdf
According to the website of Slovenia’s University of Ljubljana, their Faculty of Medicine has been involved in “…implementation of the latest molecular diagnostic procedures; an attempt to isolate the virus in cell cultures [oxymoron], which is a precondition for testing anti-viral agents and vaccines…“. The Faculty formally admitted on November 30, 2020 to having no record (even obtained from others) of “SARS-COV-2” isolation or proving a causal link to “COVID-19”; also that 40 PCR cycles have been used across Slovenia since the beginning of testing. The Faculty’s original response and an English translation are available here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…-Slovenia-University-of-Ljubljana-re-isolation.pdf
More recently, Slovenia’s Ministry of Health stated that they had no records re “SARS-COV-2” purification, PCR tests, etc. and transferred an FOI request to the Institute of Microbiology and Immunology (IMI) at the Univerisy of Ljubljana. The IMI eventually admitted in February 2021 that they have no records re “virus” purification and that PCR tests have been conducted using up to 40 cycles. Bother letters are here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…o-IMI-at-U-of-Ljubljana-no-isolation-40-PCR-CT.pdf
And more recently still, Slovenia’s National Laboratory for Health, Environment & Food (Nacionalnega laboratorija za zdravje, okolje in hrano,NLZOH – “the central and largest Slovenian public health laboratory that handles environmental protection, diagnostic and public health microbiological activities, chemical and microbiological analyses of different types of samples, and also performs research activities“) failed to provide or cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification or proof of existence, despite an intervention by the Information Commissioner. NLZOH also cited a “business secret” in responses re queries re PCR testing. fluoridefreepeel.ca/…ds/2021/06/Slovenia-Lab-package-w-translations.pdf
July 9, 2021: Slovenia’s main medical centre – Univerzitetni klinični center Ljubljana, UKCLJ (University Medical Centre Ljubljana) – provides/cites zero records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification but nevertheless claims Koch’s Postulates are fulfilled, and cites typical “monkey business” papers: fluoridefreepeel.ca/…21/07/Slovenia-UKCLJ-request-response-redacted.pdf
June 18, 2021: Argentina’s Ministry of Health strongly suggested in an FOI response to Ana Maria Daverede (re the meaningless “COVID-19” PCR tests) that they too have no record of “the virus” having been purified. In point 4 they mention “by not having viral isolates available …” (Also in point 9: “does not serve to discriminate carriage, infection, disease, contagiousness, transmissibility …”) fluoridefreepeel.ca/…s/2021/07/Argentina-no-aislamiento-del-sarscov.pdf VIDEO: Admiten que no existe el coronavirus: Develan la gran farsa canal7salta.com/…ue-no-existe-el-coronavirus-develan-la-gran-farsa/
Hall of Shame
On February 15, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted an FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the Basque Country (Spain) Office of the President and Department of Health and all dependent institutions. Months later Kepa wrote: “According to the law, they have 30 days to respond; 60 if the question is especially complex. Today is May 2nd and I have not heard from them.”
On March 30, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted another FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the flagship of Spanish research, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas /Higher Council of Scientific Research (the image below indicates the reception of the request by the institution). Months later Kepa writes: “Again, they have not responded and, therefore, their silence is refusing access to the information they may hold in regards to my question.“
“The CSIC and the Basque government are public institutions and, therefore, must comply with the Ley de transparencia, buen gobierno y acceso a la información pública/Law of transparency, good governance and access to public information. Article 20.4 of this law states that, if after 30 days there has been no response from the public administration, this silence is to be understood as meaning that the request to access the public information solicited has been refused.”
And someone kindly made this easy-to-remember tiny URL for the FOI collection – it re-directs to the page you are currently on: http://tinyurl.com/norecordfound
Would you like to help? FOI Template
If you would like to submit your own FOI request to another institution, or obtain an updated response from an institution that has already been FOI’d, here is a suggested template and some tips: fluoridefreepeel.ca/template-for-foi-requests/. Please share with me any responses that you receive!)
At this point you might be scratching your head and wonder what on Earth is going on. If so, the collection of resources on the page linked below will reveal the fraud behind the fake pandemic known as “COVID-19”, as explained by various experts. The focus here is on the isolation/purification issue, the fake “genomes” and meaningless PCR tests that are at the heart of it all.
And finally, some interviews and speeches of my own…
On November 26, 2020 at a protest in Toronto, I was given a spur-of-the-moment opportunity to deliver a message to the Canadian government re their handing of “COVID-19”, via the mainstream media. Enjoy: facebook.com/667080161/posts/10164414770715162/
On November 28, 2020 I gave a speech at The Line Canada‘s anti-lockdown protest; it begins at the 19 minute mark in this video:
In early December 2020, Kevin J. Johnston invited me to discuss the FOI documents on his weekly podcast: bitchute.com/video/ruvRPMZtSCTI//
In April 2021 I did a short impromptu interview with Lockdown Radio, at a protest in my new hometown of Peterborough Ontario (7 minutes, audio only): youtube.com/watch?v=FHi1pofmCkQ
August 10, 2021: DOES THE ‘VIRUS’ EXIST? HAS SARS-COV-2 BEEN ISOLATED?
Audio: October 1, 2021: The Worldwide Hunt for SARS-CoV-2: Christine Massey Interview about her Freedom of Information Law responses — Eric F. Coppolino of Planet Waves FM: planetwaves.fm/worldwide-hunt-for-sars-cov-2/
If you would like to receive email updates re new FOI responses, let me know at christinem@fluoridefreepeel.ca. (Proton has banned me from sending any more emails, permanently, without any warning whatsoever.)
