Schneider Teaches His Former Archbishop: A Heretical Pope Doesn't Lose His Office

"He believes that Christ allows ..." Thors Catholic Hammer gets an "F".

False assumption, at least two false premises, and false conclusion derived. Nowhere has Bishop Schneider stated he believes Christ allows anything of the sort. You're making things up again, Thor.

Your conclusion is readily disproven. It is entirely possible to recognize a Pope is evil and then, having done so, not be deceived by him.

...and then you sneer that Bishop Schneider's "lacks intelligence". I don't know how to tell you this, Crackers... you ain't the sharpest pencil in the box yourself. :D

Apply your standards evenly, Gesù è con noi , or defer from doing so. You're either a hard-core sedevacantist who doesn't recognize the last two Papacies or a flaming hypocrite with double standards for determining the effects of supposed "heresy" and "idolatry"

"You want to make us believe that Bergoglio became a pope by magic when in Argentina he was a public heretic, a schismatic and an apostate."

By your reasoning, Cardinal Ratzinger could not become Pope either. He penned "Domine Jesus" which critics argue is heretical. If so, he too is a public heretic and could not become Pope, either.

www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php

"denies the dogma of Papal Infallibility, which states that a pope cannot teach heresy in his infallible Magisterium in matters of faith and morals."

If Bergoglio is automatically excommunicated for heresy, then so is Saint John Paul II who approved "Domine Jesus" as official Catholic teaching.

"A stubborn heretic who continues to commit heresy apostasy in front of the whole world and has violated the first Commandment with the sin of Idolatry to Pachamama."

...and if you want to use that standard, then apply it evenly to the previous papacies!

You should also condemn Saint John Paul II for repeated instances of idolatry as well.
www.traditioninaction.org/…/A114rcZapotecBl…

www.traditioninaction.org/…/A070rcAssisi_Cu…

Here is JP II kissing the Quran which denies the divinity of Jesus.
akacatholic.com/…/JPII-Koran.jpg

"Remember Monsignor Athanasius Schneider that the Magisterium of the Church has dictated the automatic excommunication for those who collaborate with heretics."

Remember it yourself, Gesù è con noi Then-Pope Benedict XVI attended BOTH Jewish AND Muslim religious services and prayed with the blasphemers as well.

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/anti-pope-bened…

It's time you start applying your big black tar-brush with a fair hand or else leave it in the bucket.

Now that Bergoglio's heresy is manifest and formal, Monsignor Athanasius Schneider denies the dogma of Papal Infallibility, which states that a pope cannot teach heresy in his infallible Magisterium in matters of faith and morals. Since they can no longer deny that Bergoglio is a heretic then now he seeks to impose a well-known heretic on the Church, since Bergoglio already has two heretical documents that contradict the Magisterium of the Church: Amoris Laetitia and Querida Amazonian .
Remember Monsignor Athanasius Schneider that the Magisterium of the Church has dictated the automatic excommunication for those who collaborate with heretics.

Let's start from the beginning Monsignor Athanasius Schneider a non-Catholic cannot be a pope. You want to make us believe that Bergoglio became a pope by magic when in Argentina he was a public heretic, a schismatic and an apostate. And you want to make us believe that Bergoglio was a 'super man' who was exempt from being automatically excommunicated, to commit with impunity heresy, apostasy and schism, promote sacrilege, be a freemason, a Marxist and a gay activist and nothing happened to him.
If you believe that this kind of 'catholics immune to Ipso Facto excommunication' exists, then with what arguments do you persecute us the faithful Catholics? You have placed above the Magisterium and the Law of God a well-known heretic to impose a heretic on the Church. A stubborn heretic who continues to commit heresy apostasy in front of the whole world and has violated the first Commandment with the sin of Idolatry to Pachamama.

Bishop Schneider is quite quite wrong.
A pope who promulgates formal heresy is excommunicated from the church.
This happened with the alleged pope Francis and his Amoris Laetitia publication.
It defies all logic and rationality for an excommunicated formal heretic to remain as a pope in the Roman Catholic Church.

Bishop Schneider really ought to know better.

Heretical Pope may not loose his office, however he lose his teaching authority if he teach contrary to Christ's teaching and Apostolic Traditions, therefore should not be obeyed because if we obey him, we will automatically disobey God and sin against 1st commandment.
We can continue to respect him for the reason of his office but not to obey him as he has no authority.
We don't need competent institution to know he is a heretic, as we are given intellect, beside the Lord also told us to know by the fruit.

It is ‘dubious’ opinion, but it is a possible opinion because it has never been magisterially condemned. Catholics are free to follow this or any of the five opinions St Bellarmine lists until Church defines which is the right one. As to heretical Francis, everyone would agree that Catholics are not conscience bound to follow him in idol worship, immoral teachings of Amoris Laetitia, Querida Amazonia and his treatment of traditional Catholics. Thus, although he sits in Vatican, he de facto lost his authority.

Bishop Schneider is a saintly, wise man. But his argumentation is faulty: he doesn't consider the possibility if an anticatholic infiltrator achieving their biggest prize: becoming a Pope (according to the Alta Bendita documentos). And he takes Benedicts words as the words of a free man, not a kidnaped prisoner. Third, he says that believing otherwise is to be a pelagian, that only trusts in natural causes: excuse me, monsignor, read Saint Thomas (CG, III, 77): God governs everything through second causes... What you propose is quietism... I'm not going to say anything on the matter of Bergoglio being a pope or not, I'm not the proper authority and I don't have elements to judge adequately, even when he himself says he is a commie, I can't say. What I say is that his arguments are faulty and the Church has taken points of Faith from dubious sources (the descent to the hades, for example), the truth is the truth, no matter where you take it from