Controlled Leak Against US Supreme Court. Eight Main Points
1. Politico.com, owned by the German oligarch empire Axel Springer published on May 2 a 98-page draft [which it likely received from the Secret Services] of the Supreme Court's decision in the Mississippi …More
1. Politico.com, owned by the German oligarch empire Axel Springer published on May 2 a 98-page draft [which it likely received from the Secret Services] of the Supreme Court's decision in the Mississippi abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organisation.
2. The February 10 text (“1st draft”) by Judge Samuel Alito calls Roe “egregiously wrong from the start” and based on “exceptionally weak” reasoning. Roe versus Wade (1973) introduced abortion in the US.
3. Bombshell news: A five-justice majority (Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett) supports the draft thus considers overturning Roe.
4. The decision would not make abortion illegal but empower US states to ban it.
5. Barricades are up around the Supreme Court building and child haters have started demonstrations. Below is a video of Catholic University students praying the rosary while the haters chant “Keep your rosaries off my ovaries.”
6. Deliberations of the US Supreme Court are a secret. In modern history …More
2. The February 10 text (“1st draft”) by Judge Samuel Alito calls Roe “egregiously wrong from the start” and based on “exceptionally weak” reasoning. Roe versus Wade (1973) introduced abortion in the US.
3. Bombshell news: A five-justice majority (Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett) supports the draft thus considers overturning Roe.
4. The decision would not make abortion illegal but empower US states to ban it.
5. Barricades are up around the Supreme Court building and child haters have started demonstrations. Below is a video of Catholic University students praying the rosary while the haters chant “Keep your rosaries off my ovaries.”
6. Deliberations of the US Supreme Court are a secret. In modern history …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@John Laurer Your source shows the drone strike was NOT what Mr. Biden ordered/ intended. Your example is irrelevant.
Also there is no "antipope" and you repeating this same old drivel will get your latest sock-puppet account banned like all the ones before it, Jimmy. You heard it here first.
"there are requirements for what a real pope should be."
Cool story, Jimbo. That's why you can't and won't…More
@John Laurer Your source shows the drone strike was NOT what Mr. Biden ordered/ intended. Your example is irrelevant.
Also there is no "antipope" and you repeating this same old drivel will get your latest sock-puppet account banned like all the ones before it, Jimmy. You heard it here first.
"there are requirements for what a real pope should be."
Cool story, Jimbo. That's why you can't and won't link such a Church source listing those requirements.
Also there is no "antipope" and you repeating this same old drivel will get your latest sock-puppet account banned like all the ones before it, Jimmy. You heard it here first.
"there are requirements for what a real pope should be."
Cool story, Jimbo. That's why you can't and won't link such a Church source listing those requirements.
Ultraviolet
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@mccallansteve "A real pope would..." pic related. Also, show proof Joe Biden has murdered children.
mccallansteve
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
This picture says much. A real pope would appear with a face of stone when meeting a baby killer.
DefendTruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The Court should issue its opinion right away. Otherwise the leak wins. Then USA loses the integrity of the Court's process and thus the Court. Ciao Supreme Court. We won't miss you.
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
If Roe were not to be overturned at this point, everyone would know that it just takes a stupid leak to successfully intimidate the court. The best thing that could come from this would be for Roberts to join the majority. I think we should pray for him. He’s been an awful chief justice, but he can have some redemption.
Joséphine Cyr
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Was the Supreme Court “Roe leak” timed to take attention off of the horrific Pfizer damage data reveal?
chris griffin
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
2,500 babies aborted in the USA everyday is horrific. Aborted babies are denied life and denied Baptism. People dying from the Pfizer shots were not denied their life or Baptism.
laurelmarycecilia
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Josephine, also 2000 Mules, a documentary showing how the 2020 election was stolen, is just coming out......... this will distract from it.
chris griffin
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Another point made by other sites is the Catholic Supreme court Justice John Roberts would likely vote to retain Roe v Wade. If this turns out to be true it would be a monumental breath-taking sin against God and against innocent babies. He would have the blood of millions of babies on his hands and should be excommunicated immediately.
Joséphine Cyr
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Good point.
occasnltrvlr
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
As Supreme Court Justices, they have no lawful right to overturn any law based on any moral obligations, but rather only on legal bases. So, whether fulfilling one's sworn obligation to the best of one's ability can be sinful, I personally would leave for God to judge.
Jungerheld
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
After watching this video I'm thinking...No wonder the new phrase of the day is, "toxic 'femininity'".
Wilma Lopez
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The only reason to leak that SCOTUS opinion is to bully justices into submission
Jungerheld
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
...or eliminate one or two of them. I don't think anything is off the table when it comes to pro-aborts losing their grip on the quite lucrative industry.
DefendTruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I wonder who leaked the news ?
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Most likely a clerk of one of the liberal “justices.” I’m not sure of its legality, or lack thereof, but it should see the offender banned for life from practicing law, I would think, as it’s so gravely unethical.
Joséphine Cyr
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
"Our abortion precedents are grievously wrong and should be overruled." - Justice Clarence Thomas
