James Martin SJ Recommends Book Claiming Joseph Was Jesus’ Biological Father
Homosexual activist James Martin SJ, who was received and endorsed by Pope Leo XIV earlier in September, recommends a book which claims that Joseph was the biological father of Jesus Christ.
In an article on AmericaMagazine.org on 11 September, he discusses the book Boy Jesus by Joan Taylor. He says he read it "with great anticipation — and I am happy to say I was not let down".
He describes the book as "a model of careful scholarship that relies on old sources but breaks new ground".
James Martin continues his laude: “Taylor also advances a fascinating if unorthodox reading of the virgin birth. She suggests that people of the time who called Jesus ‘Son of David’ might have read the story of the Annunciation very differently from the standard interpretation today—while still leaving room for the miraculous. It was Joseph’s ‘seed’ that was implanted in Mary, so that Jesus could rightfully be called David’s heir.”
Taylor thinks "that Joseph is the actual father of Jesus, whose seed (of David) was miraculously implanted in Mary’s womb". James Martin adds that he "still" holds Catholic beliefs.
Father Martin’s résumé: "Boy Jesus is a significant contribution to the study of the historical Jesus. As a Bible nerd, I will say it was an engrossing, even fun read. Finally, as a believer, I will say that it was in many places consoling and moved me to prayer, as I came to know the Son of David even more deeply."
Daniel O'Connor: Any Catholic who praises and promotes this (anti-Christian, heretical and blasphemous) book “Boy Jesus,” (which describes gay artificial insemination) should be banned from teaching and preaching.
"Tell me who flatters you, and I'll tell you what kind of person you are." The Heretical Joan Taylor identifies herself as a Quaker. The Quakers have been known for their social activism and have campaigned in support of "LGBTQ+ rights".
Review: What was Jesus' childhood like? And the blasphemous James Martin, perhaps realizing that his writing makes him an accomplice to (blasphemous) heresy and an apostate, updated his article to add: "I still believe in the traditionalapproachto the virgin birth". However, it's worth noting that the blasphemous James Martin doesn't call them "dogmas" of faith, but rather an "approach." But if we read the article carefully, we will see how James praises this heretical book, which constitutes a rejection of the Catholic faith he claims to believe in. I don't understand why he uses the word "traditional" since the Church has traditionally prohibited the reading of heretical books.
The Heretical Joan Taylor identifies herself as a Quaker. One of the most distinctive beliefs of the Quaker sect is the conviction that every person possesses a spark of divinity within themselves; every person can have direct contact with God, without the need for priests or sacraments. They reject the sacrament of baptism by water and the Eucharist. They often adopt a non-propositional approach to biblical hermeneutics, such as the belief that the Bible is an anthology of the human authors' beliefs and feelings about God, rather than being the Holy Scripture, and that multiple interpretations of the Scriptures are acceptable.
Heretics are murderers of souls. Saint Thomas Aquinas stated in his Summa Theologica that the obstinate heretic, for the good of other souls, deserves not only excommunication but also capital punishment. These homosexual activists, who openly rebel against God and Catholic morality, have maliciously received the support of the reprobate Bergoglio, and now they rely on Prevost to destroy countless souls. Both Bergoglio and Prevost have not only usurped the papacy, but by claiming to have the power to overturn God's natural law, they have usurped God himself.
Titus 3:10-11 Warn a heretic once or twice, but afterward reject him. You may be sure that such a person is perverted and sinful and stands self-condemned.
2 John 10-11New Catholic Bible 10 If anyone comes to you and does not impart this teaching, do not receive him into your house or welcome him.[a] 11 For anyone who welcomes him has a share in his evil deeds. Footnotes 2 John 1:10 The author warns against feeding and housing the false teachers, for that would be sharing in their evil deeds and tantamount to public approval.
2 John 7 Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition For many seducers are gone out into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh: this is a seducer and an antichrist.
Anti-Catholic, homosexual activist, apostate, and blasphemer James Martin denies Catholic Marian dogma, which implies denying the mystery of the Incarnation and Redemption, which is the work of the Antichrist. In other words, James Martin renounces the Catholic Faith. THAT IS TO SAY THAT THE BLASPHEMER JAMES MARTIN DENIES ALL MARIAN DOGMAS: He denies the Divine Motherhood (Mary Mother of God "Theotokos"). This dogma was defined at the Council of Ephesus, held on June 22, 431, under the pontificate of Pope Celestine I. Perpetual Virginity This dogma was defined at the Lateran Council, held in 649, under the pontificate of Pope Saint Martin I. And with them, the other two dogmas are denied: the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption.
Let James Martin be anathema!!! At the Lateran Council held in 649, the solemn dogmatic definition of the PERPETUAL VIRGINITY OF THE MOTHER OF GOD was made. The Council Fathers, inspired by the Holy Spirit, composed the third canon, which declared this dogma: l “If anyone does not properly and truly confess in accord with the holy Fathers, that the holy Mother of God and ever Virgin and immaculate Mary in the earliest of the ages conceived of the Holy Spirit without seed, namely, God the Word Himself specifically and truly, who was born of God the Father before all ages, and that she incorruptibly bore [Him], her virginity remaining indestructible even after His birth, let him be condemned”. Perpetual Virginity of Mary: Binding Catholic Dogma. Is de fide dogma (the highest level) The Trinity and the Incarnation (against the Unitarians) * [From the ordinance of Paul IV, "Cum quorundam,"* Aug. 7, 1555] 1880 Dz 993 Since the depravity and iniquity of certain men have reached such a point in our time that, of those who wander and deviate from the Catholic faith, very many indeed not only presume to profess different heresies but also to deny the foundations of the faith itself, and by their example lead many away to the destruction of their souls, we, in accord with our pastoral office and charity, desiring, in so far as we are able with God, to call such men away from so grave and destructive an error, and with paternal severity to warn the rest, lest they fall into such impiety, all and each who have hitherto asserted, claimed or believed that Almighty God was not three in persons and of an entirely uncomposed and undivided unity of substance and one single simple essence of divinity; or that our Lord is not true God of the same substance in every way with the Father and the Holy Spirit, or that He was not conceived of the Holy Spirit according to the flesh in the womb of the most blessed and ever Virgin Mary, but from the seed of Joseph just as the rest of men; or that the same Lord and our God, Jesus Christ, did not submit to the most cruel death of the Cross to redeem us from sins and from eternal death, and to reunite us with the Father unto eternal life; or that the same most blessed Virgin Mary was not the true mother of God, and did not always persist in the integrity of virginity, namely, before bringing forth, at bringing forth, and always after bringing forth, on the part of the omnipotent God the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, with apostolic authority we demand and advise, etc. We as Catholics firmly believe that Mary is “ever virgin.” The Catechism asserts, “The deepening of faith in the virginal motherhood led the Church to confess Mary’s real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made man” (#499).
The apostate homosexual activist. Anti-Catholic, James Martin is a servant of the Antichrist. In his hatred of God and the Church, he replaced Christ with Bergoglio and now with Prevost. Poor wretch, the Beast has sealed his intellect, and he only works for the devil. He surpasses all the apostate and schismatic heretics of the past who didn't even dare to blaspheme against God, Christ, the Virgin Mary, Saint Joseph, or any saint who inhabits Heaven. In Scripture, we see that the Antichrist and the generation of the Serpent are the ones who persecute the Church and open their mouths of blasphemy to blaspheme against Christ and His saints. Such is his hatred for God and the Church because of his obsession with defending the vice of sodomy.
Blasphemous apostate James Martin shares the same heresy as blasphemous apostate nun Lucia Caram. Both are homosexual activists. And Saint Paul asserts that homosexual activists are themselves sodomites and idolaters. Prevost Received Notorious Pro-Homosexual apostate nun Lucía Caram – Gloria.tv The anti-Catholic Marxist homosexual activists James Martin and apostate ARGENTINE nun Lucia Caram deny Catholic dogma, and with it the mystery of the Incarnation and Redemption. In other words, they are not just heretics, they are schismatics, apostates, and idolaters. With their perverse actions, their blasphemies, and heresies, they have publicly renounced the Catholic faith under the protection of the reprobate Bergoglio and his offspring, Prevost. La apóstata y blasfema Lucía Caram negó el dogma … In a video, a Catholic YouTuber called the apostate Jorge Mario Bergoglio and his apostate accomplices Tucho and Caram the Argentine Satanic Triduum. "The Argentine Devilish Trio: Bergoglio, Tucho, and Sister Lucia Caram" The biblical curse falls upon all of them. Let them be Anathema Tucho Manipulates the Words of Christ "Tucho" Fernández is against Catholic doctrine, and the Pope (Bergoglio) is with him. By Sandro Magister
In the Middle Ages, scholars held that succubi would take the seed of their male victims (or willing servants) to be implanted into witches to give birth to the evil spirits "child." The idea that our Lord had His sacred Humanity created in such a way is the highest blasphemy.
'Father issues', it's always 'father issues'.... Why else would someone be so obsessed with 'biological' fatherhood, and in this case clearly in heretical opposition to Church teaching and the Gospels, when it merely underlines the scientifically proven lack of any biological evidence for his 'bridge to nowhere' crowd.?!!
It's well documented that homosexual men were often psychological estranged from their fathers in childhood. That's why if a priest starts talking about his "father wound" in a homily I get suspicious.