I was once deceived by this satanic fraud but thank God that in His mercy, he opened my eyes. I pray that many others will have their eyes opened , too.
The Francisan priest confessor of so called seers was layisized due to sexual improprieties and misconduct. This can not be from God.
Why have Tucho Fernandez & Jorge Bergoglio declared Medjugorje to be "Nihil Obstat" or "Nothing hinders / Nothing obstructs / Nothing stands in the way" and "Nulla Osta" or "No Objection"?
Because the wolves in sheep's clothing want the rah-rah pro-Vatican II false apparition advocated & promoted in order to draw our attention away from God's Solution delivered by Our Lady of Fatima.
Contrary to what you may have heard by its proponents... Medjugorje is NOT the fulfillment of Fatima! The 5 First Saturdays of Reparation to the IHM, The Consecration of Russia to the IHM by the Pope together with all the Catholic Bishops and The release of the Great Secret of Fatima ARE God's Solution. Fr. Malachi Martin (reader of the Third Secret of Fatima in February 1960) during an interview with Bernard Janzen in the 90's declared, "Medjugorje is a Satanic Hoax."
Bergoglio approves of the very thing which Our Lady of Fatima would have rejected. |
"I reacted (recoiled) because I thought the Blessed Mother was going to drop the Baby Jesus." - Vicka Ivanković, Medjugorje
Medjugorje: True or False? - Father Shannon Collins, 31 August 2022 |
The Truth About Medjugorje. |
Traditionally, and in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, the judgement of the ordinary of the diocese (the local bishop) has always been the standard for approbation or condemnation of an apparition. In the case of Medjugorje, the Bishop of Mostar did something unique and significant.
In his letter to Mr. Thierry Boutet (the editor / secretary general of Famille Chrétienne), the ordinary of the Diocese of Mostar (Bishop Ratko Perić), in which Medjugorje is located, says he judges the alleged apparitions to be False and Not Supernatural.
———————————————————————
Mostar 2 October 1997
Protocol Number: 1267/97
Honorable Mr. Boutet,
I am answering your letter of September 29, 1997 received by fax from the Nunciature of Sarajevo […]
On the basis of the serious study of the case by 30 of our ‘studiosi’ [academics] (well three Commissions), on my episcopal experience of five years in the Diocese, on the scandalous disobedience that surrounds the phenomenon, on the lies that are at times put into the mouth of the “Madonna”, on the unusual repetition of “messages” of over 16 years, on the strange way that the “spiritual directors” of the so-called “visionaries” accompany them through the world making propaganda of them, on the practice that the “Madonna” appears at the “fiat” (let her come!) of the “visionaries”,
my conviction and position is not only non constat de supernaturalitate [the supernaturality is not established / is not certain] but also the other formula constat de non supernaturalitate [the non-supernaturality is proven] of the apparitions or revelations of Medjugorje [...]
(Signed and affixed with the Episcopal Seal)
———————————————————————
Editor's note: "constat de non supernaturalitate" means
– the non-supernaturality is proven
– it is evident to be of non-supernatural origin
– it is established not supernatural
– it is certain to be not supernatural