en.news

Tucho’s New Document: Poetic-Affective Meditation Quoting Homosexual and Erotic Poets

Tucho Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, released on November 25 the document on monogamy, titled ‘Una caro. Elogio della monogamia’.
This 156-paragraph, 40-page text essentially compiles what has been said throughout history about matrimony, from the Book of Genesis and the Church Fathers to Popes, philosophers, pagan cultures, and poets. For example, Fernández quotes Hindu sources such as the Manusmṛti, the Bhagavata Purana and the Thirukkural to affirm the value of monogamy.
The document was written after discussions with African Bishops on polygamy and also on polyamorous relations, growing in the West.
During the press conference, Tucho couldn’t help himself but make a pro-homosexual “joke”. He said that about how 40 years ago, people used to say that Romans had a wife, but they also had another woman and another man.
In the document itself, Tucho does not appear to have committed one of his usual doctrinal errors, nor does he seem to have granted …More

181.7K

Pope Leo XIII: "There can be nothing more dangerous than those heretics who admit nearly the whole cycle of doctrine, and yet by one word, as with a drop of poison, infect the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition." -Auctor Tract, de Fide Orthodoxa contra Arianos.

salliperson

Death has a lavender scent, in reference to the Catholic Church. In the end they will lose, as was promised by our Mother, the Blessed Virgin Mary.

By not revoking Fiducia Supplicans=Sodomy and Amoris Laetitia=adultery and sodomy, Tucho and Prevost attack the Sacrament of Matrimony

Orthocat

A pro-sodomite decries polygamy? What's the end game? 🤔 Oh, tell those African bishops to zip it and fall in line! 🤫 🥴

Did he quote LaVey's "The Satanic Bible"? If not, why not?

After all - 'Pope Leo XIV: "I think we have to work together to look for greater unity, respect for all people and all religions." Wouldn't want to be labeled as 'sataniphobic', would we?!

He's Prefect for , Doctrine of the Anti-Faith.

or for the Destruction of the Faith.

Coenobium

Considering the author (I don’t mean the Holy Spirit), it’s all about footnotes, awkward imprecise language, and oh yes, the use of the “note” as a cudgel to beat orthodoxy over the head.

Some quotes from the document - read them as if it were claims from homosexuals
E.g. 86: “Already in these classical definitions we see that the unity of the two spouses … is called to a constant expression and development as a ‘communion of life’, that is, as conjugal friendship, mutual help, total sharing…”

Tucho is implying that monogamy is the universal essence of human sexuality and erotica love, that is also available to homosexual couples now blessed by the Church. Its clear what he's doing. The next CDF will have a lot of slop to clean up.

Exactly - this is from the presser
Because the topic under discussion is marriage according to Catholic doctrine, the document deals exclusively with partnerships between a woman and a man, Fernández said. However, this does not mean that there are no values in other contexts and that the content of the document cannot also apply to other forms of relationships, the cardinal said. Virtues such as patience and respect also apply to relationships between friends and other forms of relationships. What is said about men's respect for women also applies to unmarried people.

Coenobium

...coming from the kissing cardinal.

This is the psychological horizon: A central theme is mutual belonging—a freely chosen, respectful bond that excludes domination or control.

The document teaches that only two persons can make a complete, reciprocal self-gift; anything less compromises human dignity. Monogamous marriage is presented not as a restriction but as a path to enduring, faithful love that mirrors Christ’s union with the Church and reflects the inner life of the Trinity.

V.R.S.

Seems it attacks also celibate/virginity then.

Wilma Lopez shares this

Puzzled about why a quote from a Hindu "sacred" text?

2140

He even looks diabolical.

The (rhetorical) question needs to be posed: is the Catholic Church now erotic-fixated or does it remain Christocentric? Our Lord constantly represented the Judaic scriptures, fulfilling them with His exemplification of them in Word and deed. He never quoted any other texts although, given the cultural pool His land was at the time, He likely would have heard about at least some of them. Nor did He spend any time obsessed by 'human sexuality'. Tucho should resign or be forced to do so if we have a pontiff worthy of the name.