France: Moslem Call Catholics During Procession “Gang of Whores”

That's your new "bigot-bark" isn't it? :P I repeat: This is not your post. This post is not about Jews. I'm not hijacking it to push an anti-Semitic agenda you are.

"projecting your own foul deeds onto me and many others."

See my last point. I don't do what you do. And your fellow Jew-hater V.R.S. isn't "many others." Don't forget to accuse me of being a "crypto-Jew"... oh wait, you already did that. :D So, no, even here your claim fails on the facts.

You aren't doing that. Leftists are responsible, not Jews. Not all leftists are Jews. Most are not. Leftists don't bother you. Jews bother you. because you're a bigot. That's why they're the only group you ever blame.

"Funny how crypto-Jews and other useful idiots always want to shut down any criticisms of Jews."

...and bigots always mention this when their criticism is shown to be irrelevant.

"While many Catholics who speak out against her have been banned by youtube?"

That's easy. How you say something is as important as what you say, dummy. When there are active moderators, people like you don't last very long. Any idiot can call themselves "Catholic". You do it all the time.

I'm not the one posting it here, you are. Dummy. :D This post isn't about Jews or who gets banned from YouTube. Perfect example of my point. People like you are the reason "free speech" sites always turn into anarchy. Then you blame "da jooz" when administrators get tired of your post-hijacking and agenda-peddling in the comments. YouTube tried the "free speech" model for years. You're the reason why that changed. Well done. ;-)

Not for me it isn't. Fact is, many protestants are still reachable through reason, especially when they try defending Sola Scriptura. I'm not surpriesed you consistently failed. Reason plays no part in your beliefs, little wonder you can't change anyone else's

You're just another stupid post-hijacking agenda-peddler. If your pet hate was Black Southern Baptists you'd be non-stop topic-shifting onto them instead. It's what you people do and it will go on until GTV finally scrapes you off their shoes.

You've raised this before again. You just don't learn because you refuse to learn. St. Paul was a Jew himself. Further, the Jews "who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets" have been dead for over two thousand years.

Paul was writing for a contemporary audience about specific critics, not all Jews because even then not all prophets were killed by their own people.

That isn't only my view, official Catholic interpretation of Scripture contradicts you.

--Paul is speaking of historical opposition on the part of Palestinian Jews in particular and does so only some twenty years after Jesus’ crucifixion. Even so, he quickly proceeds to depict the persecutors typologically, in apocalyptic terms. His remarks give no grounds for anti-Semitism to those willing to understand him, especially in view of Paul’s pride in his own ethnic and religious background (Rom 9:1–5; 10:1; 11:1–3; Phil 3:4–6).--

So does an exhaustive, nearly word-by-word examination of the passage.

--It must be categorically stated that Paul is not advocating anti-Semitism for there is no place in the Christian faith for this sinful attitude. --

Let's see if you start whining how the USSCB is run by "da Jooz" along with every Biblical scholar who contradicts your fail. INB4 "gas-lighting". :P

"The Germanic tribes were not chosen by God to bring about the Messiah."

Yet they also rebelled against Rome, which proves there's nothing uniquely "Jewish" about a "revolutionary spirit" or that having one has anything to do with rejecting Christ, which many Germanic tribes also did when missionaries first reached them. Saint Boniface, for one.

The Jews who were chosen by God, chose Barabbas instead, and screamed crucify Him!"

Only those Jews who were a.) there b.) in the pay of the Jewish leaders. There were undoubtedly many other Jews even on that fateful day who weren't there because they had crops to tend, chores to do, flocks to care for, etc. Like always, you blame all Jews for a very small and specific group of people in one place at one time. Which is why I call you a bigot and a Jew-hater.

"They also said "His blood be upon us and our children."

Those Jewish leader don't speak for all Jews (including all ever to exist) any more than Mr. Biden speaks for all Americans right now. Failed logic on your part and every other bigot's who raises this.

"You don't even know the basics of your faith."

This is a matter of history, not faith and I'm the one correcting you even on this. ;-)

Dropping the word "sophistry" isn't a magic "get out of being wrong" card, Steve-O. Misusing it just makes you moar wrong. :D

"You can't have Jewish leaders without followers."

In that era, leadership was hereditary. Also, then as now, a small power-base controlled the majority whether they wanted it or not.

"Read the Book of Acts sometime, it's full of Jews persecuting Christians."

...which is a bad reflection on those Jews, not all Jews. You simply refuse to accept a basic fact because it contradicts your anti-Semitic world-view.

"What's their excuse?"

What's yours? Essentially the same. Stupidity born of ignorance. Some Jewish leader says "all Christians are bad" and the morons buy into it. Some Luthran says "all Catholics are bad" and the morons enthusiastically agree. E. Michael Jones says "all Jews are bad" and the morons do the same.

It shows that morons have been around for thousands of years and still are.

"By the way, those Germanic tribes did eventually convert, thanks to the Benedictine Monks who came down from Ireland."

Irrelevant to them A.) rejecting Christ at that time B.) rebelling against Roman rule at that time.

"The Jews? Nope, the majority are still revolutionaries against the moral order - Jesus Christ, the Logos"

That moment when you realize most of the early Christians were Jewish converts. So much for "the Jews" as a single group the way you always present them.

By the way, "the moral order" was originally found in the 10 Commandments and Christ Himself said, "Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." - Matthew 5:17 A Catholic would know this. ;-)

So clearly moral order predates Christ and Christ acknowledges this. Yes, this is me curb-stomping you all over GTV. :D Yes, this is me slapping you silly with history and making you eat the Gospel page by page. Now go cry off the police (which I'm certain you didn't contact) and the moderators (which I'm certain you did) and make sad-puppy whines how I'm "threatening" you again.

Heaven forbid I should be accused of "softening my tone", eh? ;-)

"So the USCCB now represents the official Catholic interpretation of the Bible..."

That's the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and yeah, that's an official Catholic institution advancing official Catholic teachings that say you're wrong. Boo hoo for you. :D

"and a PROTESTANT website is a legit exhaustive word for word examination."

when it agrees with Catholic teachings, yeah, it does. Again, you're attacking the source rather than the material. "Typical Texas Trash reasoning... them Catholics iz modernists. Dat guy's a protestant..." Except they both read the same Scripture and reach the same conclusion: your Jew-hating is wrong and not Christian.

"LMAOOO..."

The noise you make when someone writes something you're too stupid to think of yourself. :D

V.R.S teaches you a new phrase, you make the noise. I prove you wrong and you can't think of a reply, you make the noise. Proof positive. ;-)